Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-protection in the blast disease ofPanicum repens L.

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The occurrence and nature of cross-protection in the ‘blast’ disease ofPanicum repens L. were studied using detached leaves of the host, two incompatible (P 1,M 1) isolates and a compatible (PR) isolate. Protection was evident when leaf tissues were inoculated with a mixture ofP 1 andPR conidia but not with a mixture ofM 1 andPR conidia. However, prior inoculation of the leaves with eitherP 1 orM 1 protected the leaves against blast caused by the compatiblePR isolate but the protection was highly localized. The nature of protection is discussed in terms of competition between the isolates for infection sites and interactions between the host and the preinoculant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chester, K. S.,Q. Rev. Biol. 8 119 and 275 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheung, D. S. M. and Barber, H. N.,Trans. Br. Mycol Soc. 58 333 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deverall, B. J., Smith, I. M. and Makris, S.,Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 74 (Suppl.) 1, 137 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. McLean, D. M.,Plant Dis. Rep. 51 885 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matta, A.,Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 9 387 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahe, J, E., Kuc, J., Chuang Chien Mei and Williams, E. B.,Phytopathology 59 1641 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sinha, A. K. and Trivedi, N.,Nature (London) 223 963 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siradhana, B. S., Schmitthenner, A. F. and Ellett, C. W.,Phytopathology 59 405 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yarwood, C. E.,Phytopathology 46 540 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Borlaug, N. E.,Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 168 40 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ohata, K. and Kozaka, T.,Bull. Nat. Inst. Agric. Sci. Tokyo 21 C 111 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kiyosawa, S. and Fujimaki, H.,Bull. Natn. Inst. Agric. Sci. Tokyo 17 D 1 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arnon, D. I. and Hoagland, D. R.,Soil Sci. 50 463 (1940).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Giatgong, P.,Madras Agric. J. 48 (Suppl.) 334 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Veeraraghavan, J. and Padmanabhan, S. Y.,Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B 61 109 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Manibhushan Rao, K.,Il Riso 20 283 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martin, J. T. and Batt, R. F.,Ann. Appl. Biol. 46 375 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hilda, A., Studies on the blast disease-host specificity ofPyricularia. Ph.D. Thesis (1973).

  19. Maheswari, R., Allen, P. J. and Hildebrandt, A. C.,Phytopathology 57 855 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Boedijn, K. B.,Stain Technol. 31 115 (1956).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Memoir No. 217 from Centre for Advanced Study in Botany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hilda, A., Suryanarayanan, S. Cross-protection in the blast disease ofPanicum repens L.. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 84, 215–225 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03045544

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03045544

Keywords

Navigation