Advertisement

Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 83, Supplement 1, pp 411–416 | Cite as

Influence of MBC on some physiological processes in the leaves of gherkin

  • E. van Wambeke
  • P. à Campo
  • A. Vanachter
Miscellaneous Topics on Systemic Fungicides

Abstract

The effects of MBC, applied as carbendazim (Bavistin) or thiophanate-methyl (Tops in-M), on several physiological processes in gherkin leaves were examined. In the experiments the following variables were introduced: a. the cultivars used were cv. ‘Levo’, which is susceptible to Sphaerotheca fuliginea, and cv. ‘Milkus’, which is resistant to this fungus, b. the plants were either left uninoculated or inoculated with Erysiphe cichoracearum or Sphaerotheca fuliginea, c. the fungicides were either applied as a soil drench or mixed through the soil, d. the time of treatment was either 15 or 36 days before inoculation. Using various combinations of these variables, the effects of MBC on chlorophyll content, oxygen evolution from isolated chloroplasts, monosaccharide (that means fructose, α- and β-galactose and α- and β-glucose) content and fresh weight of leaves were estimated; in addition, in inoculated plants the disease was recorded. In the analyses, older and younger leaves were studied as two separate groups. On the basis of the results, the hypothesis is put forward that MBC might act as a plant growth regulator.

Keywords

Chlorophyll Content Powdery Mildew Benomyl Carbendazim Stem Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baijot, E., 1975. Contribution à l’étude de la détermination des effects phytotoxiques induits par le bénomyl. Thesis, U.C.-Louvain-la-Neuve.Google Scholar
  2. Fuchs, A., Berg, G.A. van den & Davidse, L.C., 1972. A comparison of benomyl and thiophanates with respect to some chemical and systemic fungitoxic characteristics. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2: 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fuchs, A., Fernandes, D.L. & Vries, F.W. de, 1974. The function of an MBC-releasing deposit of benomyl and thiophanates in plant roots and soil. Neth. J. Pl. Path. 80: 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harborne, J.B., 1973. Phytochemical Methods. Chapman and Hall, London, 278 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Mestres, R., Tourte, J. & Campo, M., 1971. Dosage des résidus de bénomyl dans les fruits et les légumes. Trav. Soc. Pharm. Montpellier 31: 49–55.Google Scholar
  6. Schroeder, W.T. & Provvidenti, R., 1969. Resistance to benomyl in powdery mildew of cucurbits. Pl. Dis. Reptr 53: 271–275.Google Scholar
  7. Schruft, G., 1971. Untersuchungen über einen möglichen cytokinin-artigen Effekt systemischer Fungizide auf Benzimidazol-Basis. Z. PflKrankh. Pfl Schutz 78: 280–285.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. van Wambeke
    • 1
  • P. à Campo
    • 1
  • A. Vanachter
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Phytopathology and Plant ProtectionKatholieke UniversiteitLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations