Skip to main content
Log in

Some measurements of achievement orientation

  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of interrelated studies of achievement orientation, stemming from theoretical work by Kluckhohn and Parsons, are compared. It is found that this orientation consists of at least four separate components: (1) “activism” or “mastery”; (2) “trust”; (3) “independence of family”; and (4) “occupational primacy” or “accomplishment.” The first three are positively correlated with one another and with socioeconomic status; the fourth is negatively correlated with the others and with status. The findings are interpreted in the light of theoretical problems about achievement orientation, social mobility, and economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. See, e.g., the recent book by Everett E. Hagen,On the Theory of Social Change. (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  2. David C. McClelland,The Achieving Society (New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  3. With reference to class values, see Talcott Parsons, “An Analytical Approach to the Theory of Social Stratification,”American Journal of Sociology, XLV (May, 1940), 841–62; Florence Rockwood Kluckhohn, “Dominant and Substitute Profiles of Cultural Orientations: Their Significance for Social Stratification,”Social Forces, XXVIII (May, 1950), 376–93; and Joseph A. Kahl,The American Class Structure (New York: Rinehart & Co., 1957), chap. vii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Florence Rockwood Kluckhohn and Fred L. Strodtbeck,Variations in Value Orientations (Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson, 1961). Kluckhohn and her associates have evolved and ingenious series

    Google Scholar 

  5. Talcott Parsons,The Social System (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1951), chap. ii.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joseph A. Kahl and James A. Davis, “A Comparison of Indexes of Socio-economic Status,”American Sociological Review, XX (June, 1955), 317–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Joseph A. Kahl and Robert L. Hamblin, “Socioeconomic Status and Ideological Attitudes: A Nonlinear Pattern” (unpublished manuscript, 1961).

  8. Ibid. Joseph A. Kahl and Robert L. Hamblin, “Socioeconomic Status and Ideological Attitudes: A Nonlinear Pattern” (unpublished manuscript, 1961)., p. 8.

  9. See Charles McArthur, “Personality Differences between Middle and Upper Classes,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, L (March, 1955), 247–55.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fred L. Strodtbeck, «Family Interaction, Values and Achievement,” in David C. McClellandet al., Talent and Society (New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bernard C. Rosen, “The Achievement Syndrome: A Psychocultural Dimension of Social Stratification,”American Sociological Review, XXI (April, 1956), 203–11 (also see his “Race, Ethnicity and the Achievement Syndrome,”ibid. American Sociological Review, XXIV [February, 1959], 47–61).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Joseph A. Kahl, “Urbanização e Mudanças Ocupacionias no Brasil,”América Latina, V (Outdez de 1962), 21–30;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henrietta Cox, “Study of Social Class Variations in Value Orientations in Selected Areas of Mother-Child Behavior” (unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  14. For studies of acquiesence set as a personality variable, see Arthur Couch and Kenneth Kenniston, “Yeasayers and Naysayers,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LX (March, 1960), 151–74.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alex Inkeles, “Industrial Man,”American Journal of Sociology, LXVI (July, 1960), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ephraim Harold Mizruchi,Success and Opportunity (New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1964), chap. iv.

    Google Scholar 

  17. For a study of achievement motivation that follows this approach see Harry J. Crockett, Jr., “The Achievement Motive and Differential Occupational Mobility,”American Sociological Review, XXVII (April, 1962), 191–204. For a study of intelligence see C. Arnold Andersonet al., “Intelligence and Occupational Mobility,”Journal of Political Economy, Lx (June, 1952), 218–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The preparation of this paper was aided by NSF grant G24222 to Joseph A. Kahl via the Social Science Institute, and NSF grant G22296 to the Computer Center, both at Washington University. A critical reading by Professor Robert L. Hamblin was most helpful; John E. Lyman provided efficient statistical assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kahl, J.A. Some measurements of achievement orientation. St Comp Int Dev 1, 199–211 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03041079

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03041079

Keywords

Navigation