Skip to main content
Log in

Additive two-mode clustering: The error-variance approach revisited

  • Published:
Journal of Classification Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The additive clustering approach is applied to the problem of two-mode clustering and compared with the recent error-variance approach of Eckes and Orlik (1993). Although the schemes of the computational algorithms look very similar in both of the approaches, the additive clustering has been shown to have several advantages. Specifically, two technical limitations of the error-variance approach (see Eckes and Orlik 1993, p. 71) have been overcome in the framework of the additive clustering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARABIE, P., and HUBERT, L. (1992), “Combinatorial Data Analysis,”Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 169–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARABIE, P., SCHLEUTERMANN, S., DAWS, J., and HUBERT, L. J. (1988), “Marketing Applications of Sequencing and Partitioning of Nonsymmetric and/or Two-mode Matrices”, inData, Expert Knowledge and Decision, Eds., W. Gaul, and M. Schader, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • BASS, F. M., PESSEMIER, E. A., and LEHMANN, D. R. (1972), “An Experimental Study of Relationships between Attitudes, Brand Preference, and Choice,”Behavioral Science, 17, 532–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRAVERMAN, E.M., KISELEVA, N.E., MUCHNIK, I.B., and NOVIKOV, S.G. (1974), “Linguistic Approach to the Problem of Processing Large Bodies of Data”,Automation and Remote Control, 35, (11, part 1), 1768–1788.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • CARLIER, A., and KROONENBERG, P. M. (1993), “Biplots and Decompositions in Twoway and Three-way Correspondence Analysis,” inPublications du Laboratoire de Statistique et Probabilités, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse (France), 01-93, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLOMBO, R. A., and MORRISON, D. G. (1989), “A Brand Switching Model with Implications for Marketing Strategies”,Marketing Science, 8, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DESARBO, W. S. (1982), ‘GENNCLUS: New Models for General Nonhierarchical Clustering Analysis,”Psychometrika, 47, 446–449.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • DESARBO, W. S., and DE SOETE, G. (1984), “On the Use of Hierarchical Clustering for the Analysis of Nonsymmetric Proximities,”Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 601–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECKES, T., (1993), “A Two-mode Clustering Study of Situations and Their Features”, inInformation and Classification, Eds., O. Opitz, B. Lausen, and R. Klar, New York: Springer-Verlag, 510–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECKES, T., and ORLIK, P. (1991), “An Agglomerative Method for Two-mode Hierarchical Clustering,” inClassification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, Eds., H.-H. Bock and P. Ihm, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECKES, T., and ORLIK, P. (1993), “An Error Variance Approach to Two-mode Hierarchical Clustering,”Journal of Classification, 10, 51–74.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • GREENACRE, M. J. (1984),Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, London: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • GREENACRE, M., and BLASIUS, J. (Eds.) (1994),Correspondence Analysis: Recent Developments and Applications, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARTIGAN, J.A. (1972), “Direct Clustering of a Data Matrix”,Journal of American Statistical Association, 67, 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HARTIGAN, J. A. (1976), “Modal Blocks in Dentition of West Coast Mammals”,Systematic Zoology, 25, 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEBART, L., and MIRKIN, B. (1993), “Correspondence Analysis and Classification”, inMultivariate Analysis: Future Directions 2., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEBART, L., MORINEAU, A., and WARWICK, K. M. (1984),Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis: Correspondence Analysis and Related Techniques for Large Matrices (E. M. Berry, Trans.), New York: Wiley. (Original work published 1977).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • MIRKIN, B. (1987), “Additive Clustering and Qualitative Factor Analysis Methods for Similarity Matrices,”Journal of Classification, 4, 7–31; (1989) Erratum,6, 271–272.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • MIRKIN, B., “Clustering for Contingency Tables: Boxes and Partitions”,Statistics and Computing, in press.

  • MIRKIN, B., and ROSTOVTSEV, P. S. (1978), “Method to Reveal Associated Subsets of the Variables”, inModels for Socioeconomic Data Aggregation, Ed., B. Mirkin, Novosibirsk, Institute of Economics Press, 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • NISHISATO, S. (1980),Analysis of Categorical Data: Dual Scaling and Its Applications, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • NISHISATO, S. (1994),Elements of Dual Scaling, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACKER, C.V. (1989), “Applying Row-Column Permutation to Matrix Representations of Large Citation Networks”,Information Processing & Management, 25, 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRICE, R. H. (1974), “The Taxonomic Classification of Behaviors and Situations and the Problem of Behavior-Environment Congruence,”Human Relations, 27, 567–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRICE, R. H., and BOUFFARD, D. L. (1974), “Behavioral Appropriateness and Situational Constraint as Dimensions of Social Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 579–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHEPARD, R. N., and ARABIE, P. (1979), “Additive Clustering: Representation of Similarities as Combinations of Discrete Overlapping Properties,”Psychological Review, 86, 87–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research was supported by the Office of Naval Research under grant number N0014-93-1-0222 to Rutgers University. The authors are indebted both to Fionn Murtagh, who served as Acting Editor, and to anonymous Referees for thoughtful and constructive reviews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirkin, B., Arabie, P. & Hubert, L.J. Additive two-mode clustering: The error-variance approach revisited. Journal of Classification 12, 243–263 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03040857

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03040857

Keywords

Navigation