Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 109–118 | Cite as

Trivialization of Critique in Ecology

  • Yrjö Haila


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Gould S.J. and Lewontin R.C. (1979). ‘The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme’. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 205: 581–598 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Haila Y. and Kouki J. (1994). ‘The phenomenon of biodiversity in conservation biology’. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31: 5–18 Google Scholar
  3. Haila Y. and Levins R. (1992). Humanity and Nature, Ecology, Science and Society. Pluto Press, London Google Scholar
  4. Haila Y., Saunders D.A. and Hobbs R.J. (1993). ‘What do we presently understand about ecosystem fragmentation?’. In: Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J., and Ehrlich, P. (eds) Nature Conservation 3: Reconstruction of Fragmented Ecosystems, Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, pp 45–55Google Scholar
  5. Hobbs, R. J. and D. A. Saunders (eds.): 1993, Reintegrating Fragmented Landscapes. Towards Sustainable Production and Nature Conservarion, Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Hurlbert S.H. (1971). ‘The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters’. Ecology 52: 577–586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levins R. (1966). ‘The strategy of model building in population biology’. American Scientist 52: 421–431 Google Scholar
  8. Levins R. and Lewontin R.C. (1980). ‘Dialectics and reductionism in ecology’. Synthese 43: 47–78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Main A.R. (1993). ‘Landscape reintegration: problem definition’. In: Hobbs, R.J. and Saunders, D.A. (eds) Reintegrating Fragmented Landscapes, Towards Sustainable Production and Nature Conservation, Springer Verlag, New York, pp l 89–208 Google Scholar
  10. McIntosh R.P. (1985). The Background of Ecology, Concept and Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  11. Peters R.H. (1976). ‘Tautology in evolution and ecology’. American Naturalist 110: 1–12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peters R.H. and Wasenberg K. (1983). ‘The effect of body size on animal abundance’. Oecologia (Berl.) 60: 89–96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Simberloff D.S. (1976). ‘The significance of species turnover and the status of equilibrium island biogeography’. Science 194: 572–578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Suppe, F. (ed.): 1977, The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd edition. University of Illinois Press. Urbana.Google Scholar
  15. Van Valen L. and Pitelka F (1974). ‘Commentary: intellectual censorship in ecology’. Ecology 55: 925–926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Watt A.S. (1947). ‘Pattern and process in the plant community’. Journal of Ecology 35: 1–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wiens J.A. (1983). ‘Avian community ecology: An iconoclastic view’. In: Brush, A.H. and Clark G.A. Jr. (eds) Perspectives in Ornithology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 355–403Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yrjö Haila
    • 1
  1. 1.Satakunta Environmental Research CentreUniversity of TurkuPoriFinland

Personalised recommendations