Advertisement

New Generation Computing

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 377–402 | Cite as

Determination of user interfaces in adaptive systems using a rough classification-based method

  • Ngoc Thanh Nguyen
  • Janusz Sobecki
Regular Papers

Abstract

This paper presents a novel method for user classification in adaptive systems based on rough classification. Adaptive systems could be used in many areas, for example in a user interface construction or e-Learning environments for learning strategy selection. In this paper the adaptation of web-based system user interface is presented. The goal of rough user classification is to select the most essential attributes and their values that group together users who are very much alike concerning the system logic. In order to group users we exploit their usage data taken from the user model of the adaptive web-based system user interface. We presented three basic problems for attribute selection that generates the following partitions: that is included, that includes and that is the closest to the given partition.

Keywords

Intelligent User Interfaces User Model Interface Design User Classification Rough Classification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    Arafa, Y. and Mamdani, A., “Virtual Personal Service Assistants: Towards Real-time Characters with Artificial Hearts,”Proc. Intelligent User Interfaces, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 9–12, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    Basili R., Pazienza M.T. and Zanzotto, F.M., “Exploiting the Feature Vector Model for Learning Linguistic Representations of Relational Concepts,”Proc. of the International Workshop, Tutorial on Adaptive Text Extraction and Mining held in conjunction with the 14th European Conference on Machine Learning and the 7th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 22 September, 2003, Cavtat-Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 2–10, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    Boudjeloud, L. and Poulet, F., “Attribute Selection for High Dimensional Data Clustering,”Proc. of the Conference on Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis (ASMDA 2005), pp. 387–394, 2005. http://asmda2005.enst-bretagne.fr/IMG/pdf/proceedings/387.pdfGoogle Scholar
  4. 4).
    Dattola, R.T.,A Fast Algorithm for Automatic Classification, Report ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation, Section V, Cornell University, Department of Computer Science, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    Hernandez, F., Gaudioso, E. and Boticario, J.G., “A Multi-agent Approach to Obtain Open and Flexible User Models in Adaptive Learning Communities,”LNAI, 2702, pp. 203–207, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    International Standard ISO 9241-11, “Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDT’s) — Part 11: Guidance on Usability,” 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7).
    Kanungo, T., Mount, D.M., Netanyahu, N.S., Piatko, C., Silverman, R. and Wu, A.Y., “An Efficient K-means Clustering Algorithm: Analysis and Implementation,”IEEE Transactions On Pattern Analysis And Machine Intelligence, 24, 7, pp. 881–892, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8).
    Kobsa, A., Koenemann, J. and Pohl, W., “Personalized Hypermedia Presentation Techniques for Improving Online Customer Relationships,”The Knowledge Engineering Review, 16, 2, pp. 111–155, 2001.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9).
    Kobsa, A., “Personalized Hypermedia and International Privacy,”Communications of the ACM, 45, 5, pp. 64–67, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10).
    Lieberman, H., “Autonomous Interface Agents,”Proc. CHI, 97, ACM, pp. 67–74, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. 11).
    Montaner, M., Lopez, B., De La Rosa, J.L., “A Taxonomy of Recommender Agents on the Internet,”Artificial Intelligence Review, 19, pp. 285–330, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12).
    Musial, K. and Nguyen, N.T., “On the Nearest Product of Partitions,”Bull. of Polish Academy of Sci., 36, 5–6, pp. 333–338, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. 13).
    Nguyen, N.T., “Consensus System for Solving Conflicts in Distributed Systems,”Information Sciences — An International Journal, 147, pp. 91–122, 2002.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14).
    Nguyen, N.T. and Sobecki, J., “Using Consensus Methods to Construct Adaptive Interfaces in Multimodal Web-based Systems,”Universal Access in Information Society, 2, 4, pp. 342–358, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15).
    Pantel, P and Lin, D., “Document Clustering with Committees,”Proc. of ACM SIGIR 2002, Tampere, Finland, pp. 199–206, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. 16).
    Papatheodorou, C., “Machine Learning in User Modeling,”Machine Learning and Its Applications, pp. 286–294, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17).
    Pawlak Z., “Information Systems — Theoretical foundations,”Information Systems, 6, pp. 205–218, 1981.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18).
    Pawlak, Z., “Rough Classification,”Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 51, pp. 369–383, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19).
    Schneiderman, B. and Maes, P., “Debate: Direct Manipulation vs. Interface Agents,”Interactions, 4, 6, pp. 42–61, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20).
    Shneiderman, B., “Universal Usability,”Communication of the ACM, 43, 5, pp. 85–91, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21).
    Sobecki, J. and Nguyen, N.T., “Using Consensus Methods to User Classification in Interactive Systems,”Advances in Soft Computing, Soft Methods in Probability, Statistics and Data Analysis (Grzegorzewski, P., Hryniewicz, O. and Gil, M.A. Eds.), Physica-Verlag (Springer Group), Heidelberg; New York, pp. 346–354, 2002.Google Scholar
  22. 22).
    Sobecki J., “XML-based Interface Model Socially Adaptive Web-Based Systems User Interfaces,”LNCS, 2660, pp. 592–598, 2003.Google Scholar
  23. 23).
    Sobecki J. and Weihberg M., “Consensus-based Adaptive User Interface Implementation in Product Promotion,”Designing a More Inclusive World (Keates S. et al.), pp. 111–121, Springer 2004.Google Scholar
  24. 24).
    Stephanidis, C. and Savidis, A., “Universal Access in the Information Society: Methods, Tools, and Interaction Technologies,”Universal Access in Information Society, 1, pp. 40–55, 2001.Google Scholar
  25. 25).
    http://rss.acs.unt.edu/Rdoc/library/arules/html/Adult.htmlGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ohmsha, Ltd. and Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ngoc Thanh Nguyen
    • 1
  • Janusz Sobecki
    • 1
  1. 1.Wroclaw University of TechnologyWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations