Skip to main content
Log in

Piloting a peer literacy program: Implications for teacher education

  • Article and Report
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To pilot a peer literacy program, a pretest-posttest study was conducted involving seventy (70) students from Arellano High School as tutees and 12 De La Salle University-Manila College of Education students as reading tutors. Though the results suggest the lack of impact of the Program on the Reading Grades of the tutees, the tutors’ journals reveal that the tutors benefited more from the program. The problems in using the National Service Training Program or NSTP as the vehicle in piloting the program were identified and based on this, the study suggests ways to improve the content and delivery of future NSTP Peer Literacy Programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, S., Gersten, R. and Keating, T. (2000). When less may be more: A 2-year longitudinal evaluation of a volunteer tutoring program requiring minimal training,Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 4, pp. 494–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigge, M. and Shermis, S. (1999).Learning theories for teachers. New York: Longman, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boise State University. Peer tutoring. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http://www.educ.uidaho.edu/bestpractices/peer_train.html

  • Boudouris, C. (2005). Peer tutoring: Positive peer interactions.Ohio Reading Teacher. University Heights, 37, 1, 11–19. Retrieved June 8, 2006 ProQuest document ID 996945111

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee, K. (1999).Collaborative Learning. Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge (2 nd ed.). Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burks, M. (2004). Effects of classwide peer tutoring on the number of words spelled correctly by students with LD.Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 5, pp. 301–304. Retrieved June 8, 2006 ERIC Number EJ693675. Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice. Classwide peer tutoring. Information for families. Retrieved June 1, 2006 from http://cecp.air.org/familybriefs/docs/PeerTutoring. pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, S., Arnold, M., and Lassmann, M. (2004). The impact of cross-age tutoring on reading attitudes and reading achievement,Reading Improvement, 41, 1, pp. 3–12. Retrieved June 8, 2006 ProQuest document ID: 622245961

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (2001). Can minimally trained college student volunteer help young at-risk children to read better?Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 1, pp. 28–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, A. and Riessman, F. (1993). Peer tutoring: Toward a new model. ERIC Digest. Retrieved June 1, 2006 ERIC Id ED362506.

  • Kalkowski, M. (2001). Peer and cross-age tutoring.School Improvement Research Series. Retrieved February 7, 2005 from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd /sirs/9/c018.html. The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation. (Jan. 23, 2002). Republic Act No. 9163. An Act establishing the National Service Training Program (NSTP). Retrieved June 7, 2006 from http://www.lawphil.net/statues/ repacts/ra2002/ra_9163_2002.html

  • Lippitt, P. (1976). Learning through cross-age helping: Why and how. In V. Allen (Ed.).Children as teachers. Theory and research on tutoring. New York: Academic Press, pp. 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medcalf, J., Glynn, T., Moore, D. (2004). Peer tutoring in writing: A school systems approach.Educational Psychology in Practice, 20, 2, pp. 157–178. Retrieved June 8, 2006 ERIC No. EJ680730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrick, R. & Bowman, R. (1981).Children helping children: Teaching students to become friendly helpers. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Educational Media Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F. (1994). Why understanding the theoretical basis of cooperative learning enhances teaching success. In J.S. Thousand, R. A. Villa and A.I. Nevin. (Eds.).Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omrod, J. E. (1995).Educational psychology. Principles and applications. New Jersey and Ohio: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt, G. (2002). Cross-school mentoring: Training and implementing a peer mentoring strategy.Mentoring & Tutoring, 10, 2, 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, R. (n.d.).Peer-tutoring programs for the academically deficient student in higher education. Berkeley, California: University of California Berkeley Center for Research and Development in Higher Education.

  • Schmuck, R. A. and Schmuck, P. A. (1997).Group processes in the classroom (7 th ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowman, J. and Biehler, R. (2000).Psychology applied to teaching (9 th ed.). Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. (1993). Cross-age and peer tutoring. ERIC Digest. Retrieved June 1, 2006 ERIC Clearinghouse in Reading, English, and Communication Digest # 78.

  • Topping, K. (1996). Section 1. The effectiveness of peer tutoring in higher and further education: A typology and review of the literature. From: Effective peer tutoring in further and higher education, SEDA Paper 95. Retrieved June 7, 2006 from http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/ deliberations/seda-publications/topping.cfm

  • Topping, K. and Bryce, A. (2004). Cross-age peer tutoring of reading and thinking: An influence on thinking skills.Educational Psychology, 24, 5, pp. 595–621.n Retrieved June 8, 2006 ERIC No. EJ680614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. and Bamford, J. (1998).The paired maths handbook. Parental involvement and peer tutoring in mathematics. London: David Fulton Pubs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B. (1998). Volunteer tutoring programs in reading: A review.Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 266–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, N. (1988).Peer teaching: To teach is to learn twice. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington, D.C: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remedios Z. Miciano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miciano, R.Z. Piloting a peer literacy program: Implications for teacher education. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 7, 76–84 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03036786

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03036786

Key Words

Navigation