Advertisement

Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 37–52 | Cite as

The interaction of some phytopathogenic fungi with plant tissue

  • G. van den Ende
Article

Abstract

The phytoalexin test of Müller was applied to various host/parasite combinations. The highest production was obtained when spores ofSclerotinia fructicola were on slices of potato tuber, and spores ofColletotrichum lindemuthianum in contact with bean pod tissue. During the period of incubation of the fungus on the host plant tissue substances were formed or excreted by the plant tissue. Several amino acids and carbohydrates (saccharose, glucose and fructose) could be demonstrated by paper chromatography. Most of these substances were found at much higher concentrations in the controls (i.e. drops of double distilled water incubated upon host tissue), than in the supernatant of the spore suspension after the incubation period. Drops of spore suspension and drops of double distilled water on glass cavity slides never contained these substances, or they were in such low concentrations as to be undetectable by paper chromatography. Inhibition of spore germination by a phenolic compound was not confirmed in the used test objects and host/parasite combinations.

Keywords

Phenolic Compound Double Distil Water Spore Suspension Spore Germination Phytophthora Infestans 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, P. J., - 1959. Physiology and biochemistry of defense. In:Horsfall, J. G. &A.E. Dimond, Plant Pathology 1, Academic Press, New York and London: 435–467.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, N., - 1909. L’évolution dans la symbiose des orchidées et leurs champignons commensaux. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. (9) 9: 1–196.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, N., - 1911. Sur la fonction fungicide des bulbes d’ophrydées. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. (9) 14: 221–234.Google Scholar
  4. Chester, K. S., - 1933. The problem of acquired physiological immunity in plants. Quart. Rev. Biol. 8: 119–154, 275–324.Google Scholar
  5. Cruickshank, I. A. M., - 1962. Studies on phytoalexins 4. The antimicrobial spectrum of pisatin. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 15: 147–159.Google Scholar
  6. Cruickshank, I. A. M. &D. R. Perrin, - 1960. Isolation of a phytoalexin from Pisum sativum L. Nature, Lond. 187: 799–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cruickshank, I. A. M. &D. R. Perrin, - 1961. Studies on phytoalexins 3. The isolation, assay and general properties of a phytoalexin from Pisum sativum L. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 14: 336–348.Google Scholar
  8. Cruickshank, I. A. M. &D. R. Perrin, - 1963. Studies on phytoalexins 6. Pisatin: the effect of some factors on its formation in Pisum sativum L., and the significance of pisatin in disease resistance. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 16: 111–128.Google Scholar
  9. Gäumann, E., - 1951. Pflanzliche Infektionslehre, 2. Aufl., Birkhäuser, Basel. Gaumann, E. & H. Kern, - 1959. Über die Isolierung und den chemischen Nachweis des Orchinols. Phytopath. Z. 35: 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hais, I. M. &K. Macek, - 1958. Handbuch der Papierchromatographie 1: 744. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.Google Scholar
  11. Jerome, S. M. R. &K. O. Müller, - 1958. Studies on phytoalexins 2. Influence of temperature on resistance of Phaseolus vulgaris towards Sclerotinia fructicola with reference to phytoalexin output. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 11: 301–314.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, G. &L. A. Schaal, - 1952. Relation of chlorogenic acid to scab resistance in potatoes. Science, Lancaster Pa. 115: 627–628.Google Scholar
  13. Linskens, H. F., - 1955. Physiologische Untersuchungen der Pollenschlauch-Hemmung selbststeriler Petunien. Z. Bot. 43: 1–44.Google Scholar
  14. Linskens, H. F., - 1959. Papierchromatographie in der Botanik. Springer Verlag Berlin, Göttingen und Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  15. Menon, R. &L. Schachinger, - 1957. Die Rolle des Phenols bei der Widerstandsfähigkeit von Tomatenpflanzen gegen Infektionen. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 70: 11–21.Google Scholar
  16. Meyer, G., - 1940. Zellphysiologische und anatomische Untersuchungen über die Reaktion der Kartoffelknolle auf den Angriff der Phytophthora infestans bei Sorten verschiedener Resistenz. Arb. biol. Abt. (Anst.-Reichsanst.), Berl. 23: 97–132.Google Scholar
  17. Müller, K. O., - 1953. The nature of resistance of the potato plant to blight-Phytophthora infestans. J. nat. Inst. agric. Bot. 6: 346–360.Google Scholar
  18. Müller, K. O., - 1956. Einige einfache Versuche zum Nachweis von Phytoalexinen. Phytopath. Z. 27: 237–254.Google Scholar
  19. Müller, K. O., - 1958. Studies in phytoalexins 1. The formation and the immunologica significance of phytoalexin produced by Phaseolus vulgaris in response to infections with Sclerotinia fructicola and Phytophthora infestans. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 11: 275–300.Google Scholar
  20. Müller, K. O., - 1959. Hypersensitivity. In:Horsfall, J. G. &A. E. Dimond, Plant Pathology 1, Academic Press, New York and London: 469–519.Google Scholar
  21. Müller, K. O. &L. Behr, - 1949. Mechanism of Phytophthora-resistance of potatoes. Nature, Lond. 163: 498–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Müller, K. O. &H. Börger, - 1940. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Phytophthora-Resistenz der Kartoffel. Arb. biol. Abt. (Anst.-Reichsanst.), Berl. 23: 189–231.Google Scholar
  23. Müller, K. O., G. Meyer &M. Klinkowski, - 1939. Physiologisch-genetische Untersuchungen über die Resistenz der Kartoffel gegenüber Phytophthora infestans. Naturwissenschaften 27: 765–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nobécourt, P., - 1925. Contribution à l’étude de l’immunité chez les végétaux. Bull. Soc. bot. Fr. (5e série) 1: 1094–1098.Google Scholar
  25. Perrin, D. R. &W. Bottomley, - 1962. Studies on phytoalexins 5. The structure of pisatin from Pisum sativum L. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 84: 1919–1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prochàzka, Z., - 1958. Phenole und Aromatische Säuren. In:Hais, I. M. &K. Macek, Handbuch der Papierchromatographie 1, VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena: 315.Google Scholar
  27. Tupý, J., - 1961. Changes in glucose and fructose level in Nicotiana alata styles and ovaries accompanying compatible and incompatible pollen tube growth. Biol. Plant., Praha 3: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Walker, J. C. &M. A. Stakmann, - 1955. Chemical nature of disease resistance in plants. Ann. Rev. P1. Physiol. 6: 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. van den Ende
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany, UniversityNijmegen

Personalised recommendations