Skip to main content
Log in

A new variant of dual-record population estimation with an application in remote indigenous communities

  • Published:
Journal of Population Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dual-record system methods are commonly used as a basis for population estimation. A basic assumption is that the units sampled are drawn only from the population to be estimated. This assumption cannot be met for remote Indigenous communities in Australia. A new variant of dual-record population estimation is presented, which relies on the availability of specific additional information to relax the assumption of perfect frame specification. This variant is applied to two remote Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory of Australia, using locally available data sources. Further theoretical exploration of this method is presented along with possible applications in estimating area-enumerated populations and census coverage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2002.2001 Census First Release Indigenous Profiles. <http://www.abs.gov.au/>. Canberra: Date accessed: 31 July 2004.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2003.Information Paper: Census of Population and Housing: Data Quality — Undercount, Australia 2001. Canberra.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2004,Regional Population Growth: Australian and New Zealand 2002–3. Canberra.

  • Brenner, H. 1996. Effects of misdiagnoses on disease monitoring with capture-recapture methods.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 49(11): 1303–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekar, C. and W.E. Deming. 1949. On a method of estimating birth and death rates and the extent of registration.Journal of the American Statistical Association 44: 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Lands, Planning and the Environment. 2000.Serviced Land Availability Plans. Darwin.

  • Kerr, D. 1998.A Review of Procedures for Estimating the Net Undercount of Censuses in Canada, the United States, Britain and Australia. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerry, S.M. and J.M. Bland. 1998. The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomisation.British Medical Journal 316: 1455–1460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerry, S.M. and J.M. Bland. 2001. Unequal cluster sizes for trials in English and Welsh general practice: implications for sample size calculations.Statistics in Medicine 20: 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J.R. and G.G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics 33(1): 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson A., A. Stevens and G. Wardlaw. 1994. Indirect estimates of hidden populations: capture-recapture methods to estimate the numbers of heroin users in the Australian Capital Territory.Social Science and Medicine 39(6): 823–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Cren, E.D. 1965. A note on the history of mark-recapture population estimates.Journal of Animal Ecology 34: 453–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D.F., F. Morphy, W.G. Sanders and J. Taylor. 2003.Making Sense of the Census: Observations of the 2001 Enumeration in Remote Aboriginal Australia. Research Monograph 22. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • NTGrants Commission. 2000.Annual Report 1999/2000. <http://www.dcdsca.nt.gov.au/dcdsca/intranet.nsf/pages/NTGC_Publications>. Darwin: Northern Territory Government. Date accessed: 31 July 2004.

  • Shapiro, S. 1949. Estimating birth registration completeness.Journal of the American Statistical Association 45: 261–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. 2002.2001 Census Technical Report. Census Reference Series. Catalogue No. 92-394-XIE. Ottawa.

  • Taylor, J. 1998. Measuring short-term population mobility among indigenous Australians: options and implications.Australian Geographer 29(1): 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. and M. Bell. 1996. Population mobility and Indigenous peoples: the view from Australia.International Journal of Population Geography 2(2): 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. and M. Bell (eds.). 2004.Population Mobility and Indigenous Peoples in Australasia and North America. Routledge Research in Population and Migration. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, S.W. and A.M. Zaslavsky. 1994. Using ethnographic data to evaluate dual system estimates.Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section. American Statistical Association: 254–259. <http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/>. Date accessed: 4 January 2006.

  • Warchivker, I., T. Tjapangati and J. Wakerman. 2000. The turmoil of Aboriginal enumeration: mobility and service population analysis in a Central Australian community.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 24(4): 444–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukiko E. 1995. Examination of census omission and erroneous enumeration based on 1990 ethnographic studies of census coverage.Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section. American Statistical Association: 515–520. <http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/>. Date accessed: 4 January 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Barnes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paradies, Y., Barnes, T. A new variant of dual-record population estimation with an application in remote indigenous communities. Journal of Population Research 22, 119–139 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031825

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031825

Key words

Navigation