Summary
This communication illustrates certain limitations of demand ventricular-inhibited generators in preventing stimulation in the vulnerable period. Long rhythm strips consistently demonstrated inadequate sensing of ventricular premature beats occuring within 520 msec interval after paced beats. An explanation for this finding is given.
The diagnostic value of Holter monitoring in the investigation of this problem is stressed.
References
Barold, S. S. 1971. Clinical significance of pacemaker refractory periods. Amer. J. Cardiol. 28, 237.
Barold, S. S., Gaidula, J. J. 1971. Pacemaker refractory periods (letter to the editor). New Eng. J. Med. 284, 220.
Barold, S. S., Gaidula, J. J., Banner, R. L., Litman, G. I., Goldstein, S. 1972. Interpretation of complex demand pacemaker arrhythmias. Brit. Heart J. 34, 312.
Chatterjee, K., Harris, A., Leatham, A. 1969. The risks of pacing after infaretion, and current recommendation. Lancet ii, 1061.
Vera, Z., Mason, D., Awan, N., Hilliard, G., Massumi, R. 1975. Lack of sensing by demand pacemakers due to intraventricular conduction defects. Circulation 51, 815.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abinader, E.G. Stimulation in the vulnerable period with a demand pacemaker. Ir J Med Sci 146, 263–265 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030970
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030970