Journal of Plant Biology

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 85–95 | Cite as

Low expression profiles of heat stress-related genes inCapsicum annuum



A cDNA library was constructed for hot pepper plants that had been heat-shock-treated. We used a modified differential screening method, double negative screening, to isolate 500 cDNA clones that represented genes with low expression levels under conditions of high-temperature stress. Of those 500 clones, 200 were randomly selected for single-read sequencing from the 5′ ends. After annotation with Blastx, the sequence was applied to InterProScan to scan for functional motifs of proteins. Among the cDNA clones analyzed, about 41% of the ESTs could not be functionally classified. However, of those that could be, the largest portion of the ESTs (15%) were assigned to the category of cell rescue and defense; genes involved in cell cycle/DNA processing constituted the smallest group, comprising 1% of the ESTs. Genes related to energy and protein fates constituted the second (10%) and third (9%) largest groups, respectively. Finally, 3% of the ESTs were assigned to transcription, and 2% to signal transduction. The high portion of unclassified ESTs probably resulted from the screening method, which was designed for low-expression messages. Likewise, the high number of ESTs for cell rescue and defense suggests that many genes with low levels of expression are associated with the stress response.


cDNA library double negative screening high-temperature stress hot pepper (Capsicum annuum


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 25: 3389–3402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asamizu E, Nakamura Y, Sato S, Tabata S (2000) A large scale analysis of cDNA inArabidopsis thaliana: Generation of 12,028 non-redundant expressed sequence tags from normalized and size-selected cDNA libraries. DNARes 7: 175–180Google Scholar
  3. Azevedo C, Sadanandom A, Kitagawa K, Freialdenhoven A, Shirasu K, Schulze-Lefert P (2002) The RAR1 inter-actor SGT1, an essential component of R gene-triggered disease resistance. Science 295: 2073–2076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basha E, Lee GJ, Breci LA, Hausrath AC, Buan NR, Giese KC, Vierling E (2004) The identity of proteins associated with a small heat shock potein during heat stressin vivo indicates that these chaperones protect a wide range of cellular functions. J Biol Chem 279: 7566–7575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohnert HJ, Ayoubi P, Borchert C, Bressan RA, Burnap RL, Cushman JC, Cushman MA, Deyholos M, Fischer R, Galbraith DW (2001) A genomics approach towards salt stress tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem 39: 295–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonaldo MF, Lennon G, Soares MB (1996) Normalization and subtraction: Two approaches to facilitate gene discovery. Genome Res 6: 791–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borovskii GB, Stupnikova IV, Antipina Al, Vladimirova SV, Voinikov VK (2002) Accumulation of dehydrin-like proteins in the mitochondria of cereals in response to cold, freezing, drought and ABA treatment. BMC Plant Biol 2: 5–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carninci P, Shibata Y, Hayatsu N, Sugahara Y, Shibata K, Itoh M, Konno H, Okazaki Y, Muramatsu M, Hayash-izaki Y (2000) Normalization and subtraction of cap-trapper-selected cDNAs to prepare full-length cDNA libraries for rapid discovery of new genes. Genome Res 10: 1617–1630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carson DL, Botha FC (2000) Preliminary analysis of expressed sequence tags for sugarcane. Crop Sci 40: 1769–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen W, Provart NJ, Glazebrook J, Katagiri F, Chang HS, Eulgem T, Mauch F, Luan SH, Zou G, Whitham SA, Budworth PR, Tao Y, Xie Z, Chen X, Lam S, Kreps JA, Harper JF, Si-Ammour A, Mauch-Mani B, Heinlein M, Kobayashi K, Hohn T, Dangl JL, Wang X, Zhu T (2002) Expression profile matrix ofArabidopsis transcription factor genes suggests their putative functions in response to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 14: 559–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chinnusamy V, Schumaker K, Zhu JK (2004) Molecular genetic perspectives on cross-talk and specificity in abiotic stress signaling in plants. J Exp Bot 55: 225–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cho YB, Jeon HJ, Hong CB (2003) Cloning and functional annotation of rare mRNA species from drought-stressed hot pepper (Capsicum annuum). J Plant Biol 46: 83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark MD, Hennig S, Herwig R, Clifton SW, Marra MA, Lehrach H, Johnson SL, Group tW, WU-GSCnEST Group (2001) An oligonucleotide fingerprint normalized and expressed sequence tag characterized zebrafish cDNA library. Genome Res 11: 1594–1602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook T, Gebelein B, Belal M, Mesa K, Urrutia R (1999) Three conserved transcriptional repressor domains are a defining feature of the TIEG subfamily of Sp1-like zinc finger proteins. J Biol Chem 274: 29500–29504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. del Pozo JC, Estelle M (1999) Function of the ubiquitinproteasome pathway in auxin response. Trends Plant Sci 4: 107–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falk S, Maxwell DP, Laudenbach DE, Huner NPA (1996) Photosynthetic adjustment to temperature.In NR Baker, ed, Photosynthesis and the Environment. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 367–385Google Scholar
  17. Fernandez P, Paniego N, Lew S, Hopp HE, Heinz RA (2003) Differential representation of sunflower ESTs in enriched organ-specific cDNA libraries in a small scale sequencing project. BMC Genomics 4: 40–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fowler S, Thomashow MF (2002)Arabidopsis transcrip-tome profiling indicates that multiple regulatory pathways are activated during cold acclimation in addition to the CBF cold response pathway. Plant Cell 14: 1675–1690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gubler F, Chandler PM, White RG, Llewellyn DJ, Jacobsen JV (2002) Gibberellin signaling in barley aleurone cells. Control of SLN1 and GAMYB expression. Plant Physiol 129: 191–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huckelhoven R (2004) Bax inhibitor-1, an ancient cell death suppressor in animals and plants with prokaryotic relatives. Apoptosis 9: 299–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jin H, Martin C (1999) Multifunctionality and diversity within the plant MYB-gene family. Plant Mol Biol 41: 577–585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kawasaki S, Borchert C, Deyholos M, Wang H, Brazille S, Kawai K, Galbraith D, Bohnert HJ (2001) Gene expression profiles during the initial phase of salt stress in rice. Plant Cell 13: 889–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kore-eda S, Cushman MA, Akselrod I, Bufford D, Fre-drickson M, Clark E, Cushman JC (2004) Transcript profiling of salinity stress responses by arge-scale expressed sequence tag analysis inMesembryanthe-mum crystallinum. Gene 341: 83–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kreps JA, Wu Y, Chang HS, Zhu T, Wang X, Harper JF (2002) Transcriptome changes forArabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiol 130: 2129–2141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu Y, Schiff M, Serino G, Deng XW, Dinesh-Kumar SP (2002) Role of SCF ubiquitin-ligase and the COP9 sig-nalosome in the N gene-mediated resistance response to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Cell 14: 1483–1496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Margolin JF, Friedman JR, Meyer WK, Vissing H, Thiesen HJ, Rauscher FJR (1994) Kruppel-associated boxes are potent transcriptional activation system for regulated gene expression in transgenic plants. Proc Nail Acad Sci USA 91: 4509–451 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ohlrogge J, Benning C (2000) Unraveling plant metabolism by EST analysis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 224–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Park SM, Hong CB (2001) Class I small heat-shock protein gives thermotolerance in tobacco. J Plant Physiol 159: 25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pellegrineschi A, Reynolds M, Pacheco M, Brito RM, Alm-eraya R, Yamaguchi-Peng Z, Staub JM, Serino G, Kwok SF, Kurepa J, Bruce BD, Vierstra RD, Wei N, Deng XW (2001) The cellular level of PR500, a proteir complex related to the 19S regulatory particle of the protea-some, is regulated in response to stresses in plants. Mol Biol Cell 12: 383–392Google Scholar
  30. Rabbani MA, Maruyama K, Abe H, Khan MA, Katsura K, Ito Y, Yoshiwara K, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2003) Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA gel-blot analyses. Plant Physiol 133: 1755–1767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reddy AR, Ramakrishna AC, Sekhar AC, Nagablushana I, Ravindra Babu P, Bonaldo MF, Soares MB, Etennetzen JL (2002) Novel genes are enriched in normalized cDNA libraries from drought-stressed seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa L. subsp.indica cv. Nagina 22). Genome 45: 204–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salmeron JM, Oldroyd GED, Rommens CMT, Scofield SR, Kim H-S, Lavelle DT, Dahlbeck D, Staskawicz BJ (1996) TomatoPrf is a member of the leucine-rich-repeat class of plant disease resistance genes and lies embedded within thePto kinase gene cluster. Cell 86: 123–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Ed 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Schaller A (2004) A cut above the rest: The regulatory function of plant proteases. Planta 220: 183–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seki M, Namsaka M, Abe H, Kasuga M, Yamaguchi-Shi-nozaki K, Caminci P, Hayashizaki Y, Shinozaki K (2001) Monitoring the expression pattern of 1,300Arabidopsis genes under drought and cold stresses by using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant Cell 13: 61–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seki M, Namsaka M, Ishida J, Nanjo T, Fujita M, Oono Y, Kamiya A, Nakajima M, Enju A, Sakurai T, Satou M, Akiyama K, Taji T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Caminci P, Kawai J, Hayashizaki Y, Shinozaki K (2002) Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J 31: 279–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (1999) Molecular responses to drought stress.In K Shinozaki, K Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, eds, Molecular Responses to Cold, Drought, Heat and Salt Stress in Higher Plants. RC Lan-des, Austin, pp 11–28Google Scholar
  38. Sun W, van Montagu M, Verbruggen N (2002) Small heat shock proteins and stress tolerance in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1577: 1–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tezara W, Mitchell VJ, Driscoll SD, Lawlor DW (1999) Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP. Nature 401: 914–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van der Hoeven RV, Ronning C, Giovannoni JJ, Martin G, Tanksley SD (2002) Deductions about the number, organization and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based analysis of a large EST collection and selective genomic sequencing. Plant Cell 14: 1441–1456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A (2003) Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218: 1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang W, Vinocur B, Shoseyov Ol, Altman A (2004) Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci 9: 244–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wei Y, Waltz DA, Rao N, Drummond RJ, Rosenberg S, Chapman HA (1994) Identification of the urokinase receptor as an adhesion receptor for vitronectin. J Biol Chem 269: 32380–32388PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Korea 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Ashrafuzzaman
    • 1
  • S. June Oh
    • 2
  • Choo Bong Hong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences and Institute of Molecular Biology and GeneticsSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacogenomics Research Center, College of MedicineInje UniversityBusanKorea

Personalised recommendations