, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 353–365 | Cite as

Nonlinear structural analysis using integrated force method

  • N R B Krishnam Raju
  • J Nagabhushanam


Though the use of the integrated force method for linear investigations is well-recognised, no efforts were made to extend this method to nonlinear structural analysis. This paper presents the attempts to use this method for analysing nonlinear structures. General formulation of nonlinear structural analysis is given. Typically highly nonlinear bench-mark problems are considered. The characteristic matrices of the elements used in these problems are developed and later these structures are analysed. The results of the analysis are compared with the results of the displacement method. It has been demonstrated that the integrated force method is equally viable and efficient as compared to the displacement method.


Finite element analysis nonlinear analysis force method 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Kaljevic I, Patnaik S N, Hopkins D A 1996a Development of finite elements for two-dimensional structural analysis using integrated force method.Comput. Struct. 59: 691–706MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kaljevic I, Patnaik S N, Hopkins D A 1996b Three-dimensional structural analysis by the integrated force method.Comput. Struct. 58: 869–886MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kaneko I, Lawo H, Thierauf G 1983 On computational procedures for the force method.Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 18: 1469–1495CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Nagabhushanam J, Patnaik S N 1989 General purpose program to generate compatibility matrix for the integrated force method.AIAA J. 28: 1838–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Nagabhushanam J, Srinivas C J 1991 Automatic generation of sparse and banded compatibility matrix for the integrated force method.Comput. Mechanics ’91, International Conference on Computing in Engineering Science, Patras, Greece, pp. 20–25Google Scholar
  6. Nayak G C 1980 Finite deformations by finite elements.Proceedings of the Symposium on Large Deformations in memory of Prof B Karunes, pp. 413–429Google Scholar
  7. Oden J T, Neighbors A 1976 Network-topological formulation of analysis of geometrically and materially non-linear space frames.Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Space Structures (ed.) R M Davis (London: Blackwell Scientific)Google Scholar
  8. Patnaik S N 1973 An integrated force method for discrete analysis.Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 16: 236–251MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Patnaik S N 1986 The variational energy formulation for the integrated force method.AIAA J. 24: 129–137MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Patnaik S N, Yadagiri S 1976 Frequency analysis of structures.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 9: 245–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Patnaik S N, Hopkins D A, Coroneos, R 1996 Structural optimization with approximate sensitivities.Comput. Struct. 58: 407–418MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Robinson J, Haggenmacher G W 1971 Some new developments in matrix force analysis. InRecent advances in matrix methods of structural analysis and design (Univ. Alabama) pp. 183–228Google Scholar
  13. Surana K S 1983 Geometrically non-linear formulation for two dimensional curved beam elements.Comput. Struct. 17: 105–114MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Topou A 1979A contribution to the systematic analysis of finite element structures using the force method (in German). Doctoral dissertation, Essen University, Essen, GermanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations