Advertisement

Fertility of Australian birth cohorts: Components and differentials

  • S. K. Jain
  • P. F. McDonald
Article

Abstract

The paper examines the change in the level and pattern of fertility that took place in the post-1971 period, and the downward completed fertility of successive generations of Australian women born since 1933–37. The change in cohort fertility is assessed in terms of the cohort parity progression ratios, and the four components of cohort total fertility: the proportion of women who proceeded to have a birth, mean age at first birth, mean age at last birth, and average interbirth interval for women who had at least two births. The other aspects discussed are the cohort fertility differentials and the implications of the current trends for future fertility in Australia.

Keywords

Birth Cohort Total Fertility Rate Australian Bureau Australian Woman High Order Birth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, A.Y. 1991. Convergence of the two-child family norm in Australia.Journal of the Australian Population Association 8:77–91.Google Scholar
  2. Armitage, B. and P. Babb. 1996. Population review: (4). Trends in fertility. InPopulation Trends 84:7–13.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Various years.Births, Australia. Catalogue No. 3301.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Various years.Marriages and Divorces, Australia. Catalogue No. 3310.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Various years.Australian Social Trends. Catalogue No. 4102.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  6. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Various years.Projections of the Populations of Australia, States and Territories. Catalogue No. 3222.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  7. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Various years.Labour Force, Australia. Catalogue No. 6202.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  8. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1985.Family Formation and Dissolution 1982. Catalogue No. 4411.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  9. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1986.Australian Demographic Trends. Catalogue No. 3102.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  10. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1992a.Australia’s Families, Selected Findings from the Survey of Families in Australia. Catalogue No. 4418.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  11. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1992b.Families in Australia: A Guide to Content and Procedures. Catalogue No. 4415.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  12. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1992c.Fertility in Australia. Catalogue No. 2514.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  13. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1993.Women in Australia. Catalogue No. 4113.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
  14. Kiernan, K. 1993. The future of partnership and fertility. In R. Cliquet (ed.),The Future of Europe’s Population: A Scenario Approach. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kravdal, O. 1996. How the local supply of day-care centers influences fertility in Norway: a parity-specific approach.Population Research and Policy Review 15:201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McDonald, P. 1988. How fertility changed during the baby boom.Demoz 24.Google Scholar
  17. Monnier, A. and C. de Guibert-lantoine. 1996. La conjoncture demographique: L’Europe et les pays developpes d’outre-mer.Population 4/5:1020–1021.Google Scholar
  18. National Center for Health Statistics. 1996.Advance Report on Final Natality Statistics, 1994.Google Scholar
  19. Monthly vital statistics report 44(11), supplement. Washington D.C. Ruzicka, Lado T. and John C. Caldwell. 1977.The End of Demographic Transition in Australia, Australian Family Formation Project, Monograph No. 5. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
  20. Statistics Canada. 1994.Canada Yearbook. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  21. Statistics New Zealand. 1996.New Zealand Official Yearbook. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
  22. United Nations. 1995.World Population Prospects, The 1994 Revision. St/ESA/Ser.A/145. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  23. United Nations Statistical Office. Various years.Demographic Yearbook. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Jain
    • 1
  • P. F. McDonald
    • 2
  1. 1.National Centre for Epidemiology and Population HealthThe Australian National UniversityCanberra
  2. 2.Demography ProgramThe Australian National UniversityCanberra

Personalised recommendations