Advertisement

Prevalence of and attitudes to abortion among migrant women in Sydney

  • Farhat Yusuf
  • Stefania Siedlecky
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

This study, based on a socio-demographic survey, conducted in 1988, of 980 ever-married women of Lebanese, Turkish or Vietnamese origin, shows that Turkish women had the most liberal attitudes and reported the highest incidence of abortion. More than half of the Turkish women and only 10–15 per cent of Lebanese and Vietnamese women thought that a woman should have the right to make the abortion decision herself. In spite of religious and moral objections there were many women who were prepared to consider having an abortion in a variety of common situations such as contraceptive failure, rape, extra-marital pregnancy and medical conditions.

Keywords

Migrant Woman Liberal Attitude Medical Ground Turkish Woman Contraceptive Failure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Association for the Legal Right to Abortion (ALRA), WA Inc. 1993. Abortion: summary of opinion polls.ALRA News 21.1 (lift-out sheet).Google Scholar
  2. Bureau of Immigration Research. 1992.Immigration Update, June Quarter 1992. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  3. Committee Appointed to Examine and Report on Abortions Notified in South Australia. 1970-1993.Report of the Committee Appointed to Examine and Report on Abortions Notified in South Australia. Adelaide: South Australian Government Printer.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, E.A., T.G. Jelen and C. Willcox. 1993. Measuring public attitudes on abortion: methodological and substantive considerations.Family Planning Perspectives 25:118–121, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Henshaw, S.K. 1990. Induced abortion: a world review.Family Planning Perspectives 22:76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pullella, P. 1994. Pope adamant on abortion.Adelaide Advertiser September 1, 1994. Roy Morgan Research Centre. 1994.Australian Values Study Survey. Melbourne: Roy Morgan Research Centre Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Siedlecky S. 1986. Current usage of and attitudes towards contraception in Australia.Healthright 6:7–16.Google Scholar
  8. Tietze, C. and S.K. Henshaw. 1986.Induced Abortion. A World Review 1986. Sixth edition. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Yusuf, F. and D.K. Briggs. 1991. Abortion in South Australia, 1971–86: an update.Journal of Biosocial Science 23:285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yusuf, F., S. Siedlecky and M. Byrnes. 1993. Family planning practices among Lebanese, Turkish and Vietnamese women in Sydney.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 33:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Yusuf, F. and S. Siedlecky. 1996. Family formation patterns among migrant women in Sydney.Journal of Biosocial Science 28:89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farhat Yusuf
    • 1
  • Stefania Siedlecky
    • 1
  1. 1.Demographic Research Group, School of Economic and Financial StudiesMacquarie UniversitySydney

Personalised recommendations