The strengths and limitations of demography, and the works of W.D. Borrie

  • John C. Caldwell


This lecture examines the nature of demography and how the work of W.D. Borrie relates to it. The principal topics are: the meaning of ‘demography’, changes in the discipline, the uniqueness of demography, population theories and ideologies, and the writings of W.D. Borrie.


Ford Foundation Sociology Department Social Science Discipline Optimum Population Grand Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borrie, W.D. 1948.Population Trends and Policies: A Study in Australian and World Demography. Sydney: Australasian Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Borrie, W.D. 1970.The Growth and Control of World Population. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  3. Borrie, W.D. 1975.Population and Australia: A Demographic Analysis and Projection. First Report of the National Population Inquiry. 2 vols. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  4. Borrie, W.D., L.R. Smith and O.B. Di Iulio. 1978.Population and Australia: Recent Demographic Trends and Their Implications. Supplementary Report of the National Population Inquiry. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  5. Borrie, W.D. and Geraldine Spencer. 1965.Australia’s Population Structure and Growth (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Committee for Economic Development of Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Boserup, Ester. 1965.The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change under Population Pressure. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  7. Broom, Leonard and P. Selznick. 1955.Sociology (5th ed.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Caldwell, John C. Forthcoming. Demography and Social Science.Population Studies 51(1).Google Scholar
  9. Caldwell, John C. and Pat Caldwell. 1986.Limiting Population Growth, and the Ford Foundation Contribution. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  10. Caldwell, John C., Peter F. McDonald and Lado T. Ruzicka. 1981. Nuptiality and fertility in Australia, 1921–1976. Pp.211–241 in L.T. Ruzicka (ed.),Nuptiality and Fertility: Proceedings of a Seminar Held in Bruges (Belgium), 8–11 January 1979. Liège: Ordina.Google Scholar
  11. Carr-Saunders, A.M. 1922.The Population Problem: A Study in Human Evolution. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  12. Carr-Saunders, A.M. 1936.World Population: Past Growth and Present Trends. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  13. Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1985. Social sciences. In Kuper and Kuper, 1985. Davis, Kingsley. 1948.Human Society. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Labour and Immigration. 1975.Index to Population and Australia: A Demographic Analysis and Projection. Canberra.Google Scholar
  15. Ehrlich, Paul. 1968.The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  16. Feeney, Griffith. 1994. Recent estimates of Chinese fertility. Seminar paper presented at Contemporary China Centra, The Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, H. and L. Taylor. 1975. Conceptions and commissions: parallels in the development of demography and criminology.Sociological Review 23:629–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham, H. and L. Taylor. 1977. Typifying demography: reply to C. Shannon Stokes.Sociological Review 25:153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hardin, Garrett. 1974. Living in a lifeboat.Bioscience 24:561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardin, Garrett. 1993.Living within Limits: Ecology, Economics, and Population Taboos. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, Stuart. 1993. Environment and sustainable development: an Australian social science perspective. Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia Occasional Paper. Canberra.Google Scholar
  22. Hauser, P.M. and O.D. Duncan. 1959a. The nature of demography. In Hauser and Duncan 1959b.Google Scholar
  23. Hauser, P.M. and O.D. Duncan (eds). 1959b.The Study of Population: An Inventory and Appraisal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Higgins, al. 1982.Potential Population Capacities of Land in the Developing World. Rome: FAO/IIASA/UNFPA.Google Scholar
  25. Institut National d’Etudes Ddmographiques (INED). 1993.Bulletin Mensuel d’Information 282. Paris.Google Scholar
  26. Keyfitz, Nathan. 1993. Thirty years of demography and Demography.Demography 30:533–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keynes, J. Maynard. 1971a.The Economic Consequences of the Peace. London: Macmillan (first published 1920).Google Scholar
  28. Keynes, J. Maynard. 1971b.A Tract on Monetary Reform. London: Macmillan (first published 1923).Google Scholar
  29. Kirk, Dudley. 1968. The field of demography. In Sills, 1968.Google Scholar
  30. Knibbs, George H. 1917.The Mathematical Theory of Population, of Its Character and Fluctuations, and the Factors Which Influence Them. Appendix A to the 1911 Census of Australia, Vol. 1. Melbourne: McCarron, Bird and Co.Google Scholar
  31. Knibbs, George H. 1928.The Shadow of the World’s Future or the Earth’s Population Possibilities and the Consequences of the Present Rate of Increase of the Earth’s Inhabitants. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
  32. Kuczynski, R.R. 1948-1953.Demographic Survey of the British Colonial Empire. 3 Vols. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kuper, A. and J. Kuper (eds). 1985.The Social Science Encyclopaedia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  34. Meadows, Donella al. 1972.The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  35. Moore, W.E. 1959. Sociology and demography. In Hauser and Duncan, 1959b. National Academy of Sciences. 1971.Rapid Population Growth: Consequences and Policy Implications. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  36. National Research Council. 1986.Report of the Working Group on Population Growth and Economic Development. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  37. Paddock, William and Paul Paddock. 1967.Famine 1975: America’s Decision: Who Will Survive? Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  38. Preston, Samuel H. 1993. The contours of demography: estimates and projections.Demography 30:593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robinson, W.S. 1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals.American Sociological Review 15:351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seligman, E.R.A. 1948. What are the social sciences? In Seligman and Johnson, 1948. Seligman, E.R.A. and A. Johnson (eds). 1930–1936.Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Seligman, E.R.A. and A. Johnson (eds). 1948.Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Sills, D.L. (ed.). 1968.International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Spengler, Oswald. 1926-1928.The Decline of the West. London: G. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  44. Stycos, J.M. 1987. Demography as an interdiscipline.Sociological Forum 2.Google Scholar
  45. Wilson, E.O. 1975.Sociology. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
  46. Wolfe, A.B. 1948. Demography. In Seligman and Johnson, 1948.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Caldwell
    • 1
  1. 1.Health Transition Centre National Centre for Epidemiology and Population HealthThe Australian National UniversityCanberra

Personalised recommendations