Advertisement

Asia Pacific Education Review

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 178–193 | Cite as

Teachers’ cultural differences: case studies of geography teachers in Brisbane, Changchun and Hong Kong

  • Chi Chung Lam
  • John Lidstone
Article and Report

Abstract

The primary purpose of this exploratory study is to identify variations in the ways in which individual teachers in different educational contexts interpret their curriculum and plan their lessons and in particular to explore the possibility that cultural differences as identified by Hofstede (1991) may be a contributing factor to understanding how teachers understand their work. “Educational reform” has become a catchphrase in the Anglo-American world, including the United States, Canada, Australia, and England and Wales, as well as in the Confucian Heritage Areas such as Mainland China, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Across the world, the educational reform measures being implemented are surprisingly similar. This paper describes a study of how geography teachers in Queensland, Australia, Hong Kong, and Changchun, China, plan their lessons and curriculum. From classroom observations and interviews with the teachers involved, we confirmed marked differences in each location regarding their cultural traits of power distance, individualist and collectivist preference and uncertainty tolerance, and that these traits appear to be highly influential in their curriculum planning. Despite the small scale of this study, we contend that there are good reasons for caution before national education systems import policies and curriculum reform initiatives from other countries for unthinking adoption.

Key words

cultural differences teacher decision making geography teaching 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bohannan, P. (1995).How culture works. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brady, L., & Kennedy, K. (1999).Curriculum construction. Sydney: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. (1996).The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, K. M., & Wong, K. C. (1996). School effectiveness in East Asia: Concepts, origins and implications,Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cuban, L. (2001).Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cuban, L. (2004).The blackboard and the bottom line. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dimmock, C., & Lee, J. C. K. (2000). Redesigning school-based curriculum leadership: A cross-cultural perspective,Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 15(4), 332–358.Google Scholar
  8. Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (1998). Comparative educational administration: Developing a cross-cultural conceptual framework,Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(4), 558–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisner, E. W. (2002).The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Elmore, R. F. (1996). Commentary: School reform, teaching and learning,Journal of Education Policy, 11(4), 499–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fullan, M. (2007).The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fung, Y. W., & Lee, J. C. K. (1987). The development of geographical education in Hong Kong since 1945,Education Journal, 15(2), 60–67.Google Scholar
  13. Goodman, I. (1983).School subjects and curriculum change. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  14. Hallinger, P., & Kantamara, P. (2000). Leading at the confluence of tradition and globalization: The challenge of change in Thai schools,Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 20(2), 46–57.Google Scholar
  15. Hallinger, P., & Leithwood, K. (1996). Culture and educational administration: A case of finding out what you don’t know you don’t know,Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 98–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hannerz, U. (1992).Cultural complexity: Studies in the social organization of meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hargreaves, A. (2003).Teaching in the knowledge society. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hofstede, G. (1994). Cultural constraints in management theories,International Review of Strategic Management, 5, 27–48.Google Scholar
  19. Hofstede, G. (1995). The business of international business is culture. In T. Jackson (Ed.),Cross-cultural management (pp.150–165). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  20. Joseph, P. B. (2000). Curriculum as culture. In P. B. Joseph, S. L. Bravmann, M. A. Windschitl, E. R. Mikel, & N. S. Green (Eds.),Cultures of curriculum (pp. 15–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly, A. (2004).The curriculum: Theory and practice (5th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Lam, C. C. (2001). The proposed curriculum reform of Hong Kong: Full of contradictions, short of professionalism,Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 131–157.Google Scholar
  23. Lam, C. C., Ho, E., & Wong, N. Y. (2002). Parents’ beliefs and practices in education in Confucian Heritage Culture,Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 3(1), 99–114.Google Scholar
  24. Lankshear, C., & Snyder, I. (2000).Teachers and techno-literacy: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  25. Lawton, D. (1996).Beyond the national curriculum. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  26. Leung, J. Y. M. (1991). Modernising the geography curriculum in post-1976 China. In K. M. Lewin & J. S. Stuart (Eds.),Educational innovation in developing countries: Case studies of changemakers (pp.23–60). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Little, J. W., & McLaughlin, M. W. (Eds.). (1993).Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues and contexts. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Liu, B. (1997). Strengthening leadership and carrying forward quality education in a down-to-earth way,Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 11, 1–5.Google Scholar
  29. Moon, B. (2001).A guide to national curriculum (4th ed.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. O’Donoghue, T. A., & Dimmock, C. (1998).School restructuring: International perspectives. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  31. Ou, Y. (2000).Curriculum reform. Taipei: Taiwan Normal University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rawling, E. M. (2001).Changing the subject: The impact of national policy on school geography 1980-2000. Sheffield: The Geographical Association.Google Scholar
  33. Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992).The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  34. Stoltman, J. P. (1992). Geographic education in the United States: The Renaissance of the 1980s. In M. Naish (Ed.),Geography and education: National and international perspectives (pp.262-275). London: University of London, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  35. Maiden, S. (2007, May 15). Howard promises return to basics in schools.The Australian newspaper. Retrieved May 24, 2007, from http://www.news.com.auGoogle Scholar
  36. Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (1996).The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong; Melbourne, Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  37. Zhang, T. K. (2001). School-based curriculum development in Mainland China: Problems and controversies. In Association for Research and Development of Teaching Materials (Eds.),Proceedings of conference on school-based curriculum development in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong (pp.21–30). Taipei: Association for Research and Development of Teaching Materials.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and InstructionThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin, Hong Kong
  2. 2.Queensland University of TechnologyAustralia

Personalised recommendations