Metals and Materials

, Volume 6, Issue 5, pp 429–433 | Cite as

Microstructure and rolling contact fatigue life of austenitic nitrocarburized STB 2 high carbon chromium bearing steel

  • Dong-Joo Yoon
  • Min-Ho Lee
  • Jai-Koan Jin
  • Sang-Ho Kang
  • Tae-Hyun Nam


Microstructures and rolling contact fatigue properties of STB 2 high carbon chromium bearing steel were investigated by means of electron microscopy, hardness tests and rolling contact fatigue tests. In order to examine the influence of the heat treatment process on microstructures and rolling contact fatigue, two kinds of heat treatment processes, quenching/tempering (QT) and austenitic nitrocarburizing were performed on STB 2 steel. Rolling contact fatigue life of the nitrocarburized steel was 3.7 times longer than that of the QT treated steel under a clean lubrication condition and was 1.5 times longer under a contaminated lubrication condition. The amount of retained austenite in the nitrocarburized steel was found to be larger than that in the QT treated steel. As the tempering temperature was increased from 150°C to 300°C, the decrease in hardness for the nitrocarburized steel was smaller than that of the QT treated steel. This means that the nitrocarburized steel is suitable as bearing material for high temperature applications. Very fine Fe4(Fe(CN)6)3 carbonitride of less than l00nm in diameter was found in the nitrocarburized steel. An improvement in rolling contact fatigue life in the nitrocarburized steel was attributed to the combination of the formation of very fine Fe4(Fe(CN)6)3 and retained austenite.


austenitic nitrocarburizing quenching/tempering rolling contact fatigue life carbonitride retained austenite 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Osterlund and O. Vingsbo,MetalL Trans. A 11, 701 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. A. Stickels and A. M. Janotik,Metall. Trans. A 11, 467 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. M. Keer, M. D. Bryant and G. K. Harotos,Trans. ASME J. Lubr. Tech. 104, 347 (1982).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Swahn, P. C. Becker and O. Vinsbo,Metall. Trans. A 7, 1099 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. K. Lee and B. Y. Choi,J. Kor. Inst. Met. & Mater. 30, 1369 (1992).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. M. Martin and A. D. Eberhardt,Trans. ASME 89, 932 (1967).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. P. Davies,Heat Treatments of Metals, 97 (1991).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. K. Kiessling,Heat Treatments of Metals, 97 (1979).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. K. Kiessling,Heat Treatmens of Metals, 97 (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. M. Tong, Y. Z. Zhou, T. Y. Shen and H. J. Deng,Wear 135, 217 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. M. Beswick,Metall. Trans. A 18, 1897 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Z. Nishyama,Martensitic Transformation, p. 304, Academic Press, NewYork (1978).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. J. Yoon, J. H. Shin and B. Y Choi,J. Kor. Inst. Met. & Mater. 32, 329 (1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong-Joo Yoon
    • 1
  • Min-Ho Lee
    • 2
  • Jai-Koan Jin
    • 3
  • Sang-Ho Kang
    • 4
  • Tae-Hyun Nam
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Advanced Material EngineeringHanlyo UniversityKwangyangKorea
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgical EngineeringKwangyang CollegeKwang yangKorea
  3. 3.EAG Hanwha Bearing Co.Chonju PlantDukjin-ku, ChonjuKorea
  4. 4.Division of Materials Science and Engineering and RECAPTGyeongsang National UniversityChinjuKorea

Personalised recommendations