Skip to main content
Log in

Implementing curriculum integration: The experiences of Korean elementary teachers

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines 1) how Korean elementary teachers implement curriculum integration in their teaching practice and 2) what Korean elementary teachers experience in implementing curriculum integration. Several issues evolved from the analysis of three teachers ’ experiences: firstly, the teachers ’ lack of theoretical frameworks for curriculum integration, secondly, the teachers ’ pragmatic approach to curriculum integration, and thirdly, the limitations on implementing curriculum integration. In order for curriculum integration to be properly implemented and sustained, teachers ’ roles in and understanding of the curricula are crucial. Thus, the implications of the findings are discussed in terms of teacher preparation and training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcavi, A., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Mathematics tutoring through a constructivist lens: The challenges of sense-making.Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11(4), 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, G. M. (1986) Constructivism: A theory of knowledge.Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y., & Kim, K. (1996). The construction of theme-based curriculum integration.The Korean Journal of Educational Research, 34(1), 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caine, R., & Caine, G. (1991). Reinventing schools through brain-based learning.Educational Leadership, 52(7), 43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982).Corporate cultures. MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1902).The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues.Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. M. (1998).Creating integrated curriculum: Proven ways to increase student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. K., & Fouts, J.F. (2001) Interdisciplinary curriculum: The research base.Music Educators Journal, 87(5), 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, R. (1991). Ten ways to integrate curriculum.Educational Leadership, 49(2), 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., & Boix-Mansilla, V. (1994). Teaching for understanding in the discipline and beyond.Teachers College Record, 96, 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrke, N. J. (1991). Exploration of teachers ’ development of integrative curriculum.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(6), 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. F., & Marsh, C. J. (1996).Studying school subjects: A guide. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, G. (2004).Philosophical and ideological voices in education. Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Ryan, J. (1996).Schooling for change: Reinventing education for early adolescents. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Moore, S. (2000). Curriculum integration and classroom relevance: A study of teachers ’ practice.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 15(2), 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. R., & Alexander, P. A. (1998). Integrated, constructivist education: Challenge and reality.Educational Psychology Review, 10(2), 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y. (2006). A case study on elementary teachers ’ curriculum integration.Anthropology of Education, 9(2), 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, M. A. (1999). Theoretical and empirical investigations of integrated mathematics and science education in the middle grades with implications for teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education, 50(1), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Y. (1998). A recent trend of educational research for curriculum integration.The Journal of Chunnam Education, 92, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, K. (2006). A narrative inquiry into implementation of integrated textbooks based on Korean elementary teachers.The Korean Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(3), 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D., & Brooks, J. (1996). Interdisciplinary collaboration in teacher education: A constructivist approach.TESOL Quarterly, 30, 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. (1996). A model for developing integrated curriculum at the school level.The Korean Journal of Curriculum Studies, 14(3), 18–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (1992). The necessity and validity of curriculum integration.The Journal of Education Development, 14, 92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996).Interview: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. (2001).Curriculum integration. Seoul, Korea: Hakjisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansilla, V. B., Miller, W. C., & Gardner, H. (2000). On disciplinary lenses and interdisciplinary work. In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman (Eds.),Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges to implementation (pp. 17–38). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994).Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1986).Research interviewing-Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken.Qualitative Health Research, 3(1), 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Na, J. (2004). Elementary school teachers ’ understandings on curriculum integration.The Korean Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(1), 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panaritis, P. (1995). Beyond brainstorming: Planning a successful interdisciplinary program.Phi Delta Kappan, 86(8), 623–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. (2007). A narrative inquiry into what school culture makes it difficult to implement curriculum integration: A beginning teacher ’s experience.Anthropology of Education, 10(1), 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C., & Shea, K. T. (2006). Moving from separate subject to interdisciplinary teaching: The complexity of change in a preservice teacher K-1 early field experience.The Qualitative Report, 11(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. G. Tobin (Ed.),The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3–21). Washington: AAAS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The grammar of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change?American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L., & Malone, J. (1999).Science, mathematics, and technology: Case studies of integrated teaching. Perth, WA: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minjeong Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, M. Implementing curriculum integration: The experiences of Korean elementary teachers. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 9, 308–319 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026719

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026719

Key words

Navigation