Advertisement

Asia Pacific Education Review

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 262–269 | Cite as

A study on the application of laozi ’s thoughts on educational leadership and management

  • Lian-shiung Wen
  • Kevin P. Hwang
Article

Abstract

This paper attempts to apply historical methods to help understand the relationship between the philosophy espoused in the works of Laozi or Tao De Ching and educational leadership. The objective is to study the thought of Laozi regarding leadership, to identify ideas and solutions that can be applied in modern educational management, as well as to provide a new definition and values to the ideas of Laozi. Laozi lived in ancient times, meaning that the works describing his thought are difficult to understand. The present study is primarily based on English sources written on Laozi by Ju-Chou Yang and on the commentary on Laozi by Bi Wang. Additionally, this article also refers to and compares other comments on the ideas of Laozi regarding management. This study finds that Laozi had varied ideas on management and philosophy. Laozi ’s views regarding organization are still relevant today. He stressed flexibility and the importance of adapting to the environment. As regards leadership, Laozi emphasized non-action, softness, humility, calmness and the elimination of desire. Furthermore, in his art of employment, Laozi insisted that leaders must overcome their personal likes and dislikes in relation to individuals to ensure the full utilization of their potential.

Key words

non-action softness humility calmness elimination of desire 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnard, C. I. (1968).The functions of the executive. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bass, B. M. (1990).Bass and Stogdill ’s handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B. (1985).Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. Burns, J. M. (1978).Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, G. Y. (1993).New comments on Laozi and Zhuangzi. Taipei: Wu-Nan Books.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, M. (1986).Talk on management experiences. Taipei: Zhi Wen Books.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, Y. D. (1957).The history of ancient chinese philosophy. Taipei: Zhong Hua Books.Google Scholar
  8. Geneen, H. S., & Moscow, A. (1984).Managing. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  9. Hollander, E. P. (1978).Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to successful relationships. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. McGregor, D. (1985)The human side of enterprise: 25th anniversary printing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Robbins, S. P. (2001).Organizational behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Tan, Y. Q. (1994).Comments on Xunzi ’s theories. Taipei: Wen Chin Books.Google Scholar
  13. Wang, B. X. (1993).The philosophy of Laozi. Taipei: Dong Da Books.Google Scholar
  14. Wang, B. X. (1995).The way of Laozi. Taipei: Han Yi Se Yan Culture Co.Google Scholar
  15. Wu, I. (1994).Annotation of new interpretation of Laozi. Taipei: SanMin Books.Google Scholar
  16. Xu, S. X. (1988).Managing: theory, process, and practice. Taipei: China Management Consultants Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Yang J. C. (1987).Laozi Tao De Ching. Taipei: Wen Chu.Google Scholar
  18. Zhang, T. Y. (1993).The interpretation of Zhuangzi. Taipei: Guang Wen Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Transportation & Communication Management ScienceGraduate School of Institute of Telecommunications Management, National Cheng Kung UniversityTaiwan
  2. 2.National Cheng KungUniversity TaiwanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations