Asia Pacific Education Review

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 393–408 | Cite as

When China opens to the world: A study of transnational higher education in Zhejiang, China

  • Ka Ho Mok
  • Xiaozhou Xu


The economic transition in China since the late 1970s has led to not only drastic social transformations but also rapid advancements in science and technology, as well as the revolution in information and communications technology. In order to enhance the global competence of the Chinese population in coping with the challenges of a knowledge-based economy, the higher education sector has been going through restructuring along the lines of marketization, privatization and decentralization. Responding to the the challenges of globalization, the Chinese government has opened up the education market by allowing overseas universities to offer programmes on the mainland. This article sets out in this wider policy context to examine the current developments of transnational higher education in China, with particular reference to how students in Zhejiang province enrolling in these overseas programmes, especially those offered by Australian providers, evaluate their learning experiences. This article will also discuss the major concerns raised by the respondents in our study regarding the newly emerging transnational higher education programmes, with particular reference to examining how far these new programmes would affect the regulatory framework in Chinese higher education.

Key words

China transnational higher education higher education regulatory framework student evaluation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. CCPCC. (1993).Outline for reform and development of education in China. Beijing: People’s Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chan, D. & Mok, K. H. (2001). Educational reforms and coping strategies under the tidal wave of marketization: a comparative study of Hong Kong and the Mainland China.Comparative Education, 37(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, Z. L. (2003). Historical accomplishments in education reform and development.China Education Daily, 1–3.Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, K. M. (1995). Education — decentralization and the market. In L. Wong and S. MacPherson (Eds.),Social Change and Social Policy in Contemporary China (pp.50–69). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  5. Fukuyama, F. (2005).State capacity: Governance and world order in the Twenty-First Century. Profile Books, Surrey.Google Scholar
  6. GATE. (1999).Trade in transnational education services. The global alliance for transnational education. Washington, DC: GATE.Google Scholar
  7. Huang, F. T. (2005). Qualitative enhancement and quantitative growth: changes and trends of China’s higher education.Higher Education Policy, 18, 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang, F. T. (2005a). The growth and development of transnational higher education in China. In K. H. Mok & R. James (Eds),Globalization and higher education in East Asia (pp. 170–184). New York & Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.Google Scholar
  9. Huang, F. T. (2006). Transnational higher education in mainland China: A focus on foreign degree-conferring programs.RIHE International Publication Series, 10, 21–34.Google Scholar
  10. Huang, F. T. (2006a). Internationalization of higher education in China.Paper presented at the Internationalization of Universities Conference, July 2006, Osaka University, Japan.Google Scholar
  11. Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2005). Preface: The making of as new regulatory order.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 1–6.Google Scholar
  12. Lin, J. (2004). China: private trends.International Higher ducation, 36, 17–18.Google Scholar
  13. Lin, J., Zhang, Y., Gao, L., & Liu, Y. (2005). Trust, ownership, and autonomy: Challenges facing private higher education in China.The China Review, 5(1), 61–82.Google Scholar
  14. Meek, L. (2006).The role of evaluation in Australian universities. Paper presented at the First Session of the International Academic Advisory Committee for University Evaluation, January 2006, Hangzhou Xihu State Guesthouse, China.Google Scholar
  15. Min, W. F. (2004). Chinese higher education: The legacy of the past and the context of the future. In P.G. Altbach & T. Umakoshi (Eds),Asian universities: Historical perspectives and contemporary challenges (pp. 53–84). Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ministry of Education. (2004). List of joint programmes Leading to degrees of foreign universities and universities of Hong Kong. Retrieved April, 12, 2006, from Scholar
  17. Mok, K. H. (2006).One country, diverse systems: Politics of educational decentralization in Post-Mao China. Paper presented at the Contemporary China Seminar Series, Institute of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Mok, K. H. (2006a). The quest for a regional hub of higher education: Transnational higher education and changing governance in Singapore.RIHE International Publication Series, 10, 127–150.Google Scholar
  19. Mok, K. H. (2009). The growing importance of the privateness in education: Challenges for higher education governance in China.Compare,39(1), (In Press).Google Scholar
  20. Mok, K. H., & Ngok, K. L. (2008). One country, diverse systems: Politics of educational decentralization and challenges for regulatory state in post-Mao China.China Review, 8(2), 169–200.Google Scholar
  21. Morshidi, S. (2006). Transnational higher education in Malaysia: Balancing benefits and concerns through regulations.RIHE International Publication Series, 10, 109–126.Google Scholar
  22. Ngok, K. L. (2006). Marketizing higher education in China: Critical reflections.Paper presented at the Ideas and Universities Seminar Series, March 2006, Institute of Advanced Studies, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  23. Ngok, K. L., & Kwong, J. (2003). Globalization and educational restructuring in China. In Mok, K. H., & Welch, A. (Eds),Globalization and educational restructuring in the Asia and Pacific Region (pp. 160–188). Palgrave Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  24. Painter, M., & Wong, S. F. (2005). Varieties of the regulatory state? Government-business relations and telecommunications reforms in Malaysia and Thailand.Policy and Society, 24(3), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. State Council, People’s Republic of China (2003). Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Chinese-Foreign cooperation in running schools. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from Scholar
  26. State Education Commission (SEC) (1995). Interim provisions for Chinese-Foreign cooperation in running schools. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from Scholar
  27. Wen, B. (2005).Blue book of Zhejiang 2005. Hangzhou: Hangzhou Publishing House.Google Scholar
  28. Wu, Y. Y. (2003). Reforming higher education finance.Education and Economy, 3, 2–6.Google Scholar
  29. Xiang, N. N. (2005). Questions and future of the Minban Second-tier Colleges,Taiyuan normal college newsletter, 4, 10–16.Google Scholar
  30. Yang, D. G. (2002).China’s entry into WTO: Some implications for Chinese educational reform and development. First assembly of the Global University Network for Innovation (GUNI-AP), March 2002, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.Google Scholar
  31. Yang, R. (2002).The third delight: Internationalization of higher education in China. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Yang, R. (2006). Transnational higher education in Hong Kong: An analysis.RIHE International Publication Series, 10, 35–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Hong KongChina
  2. 2.Dean of College of EducationZhejiang UniversityChina

Personalised recommendations