IT Entry knowledge and skills of university teachers vis-à-vis their interest levels: the case of the oldest university in Asia

  • Allan B. de Guzman
  • Camilla J. Vizconde


Technology, considered as the new language of teaching and learning, is an irrevocable reality. Any institution of higher learning is expected to look into the future without losing sight of its core capabilities-the malleability of its faculty members. Today, more than ever, teachers are expected to operate in an environment where “hiteach”, “hi-touch” and “hi-tech” govern their instructional behaviors. It is in this light that this study was conducted to situate teachers coming from a time-tested institution, such as the University of Santo Tomas, the oldest university in Asia, in terms of their IT knowledge, skills, and interests with a view to identifying implications on how faculty development programs may be made more responsive to the present-day educational structure.

Key Words

interest levels IT knowledge and skills professional development 


  1. Brow, M., Boyle, B., & Boyle, T. (2002). Professional development and management training needs for heads of department in UK secondary schools.The Journal of Educational Administration, 40(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bostingl, J. (1996).Schools of Quality. USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).Google Scholar
  3. Dede C. (1997). Rethinking How to Invest in Technology.Educational Leadership, 55(3), 12–19.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, J. L., Green, K. E., & Lyons, C. A. (2002). Personal Empowerment, Efficacy and Environmental Characteristics.The Journal of Educational Administration, 40(1), 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frenzel, C. W. (1996).Management of Information Technology (2nd ed.). Massachusetts: Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Godfrey, C. (2001a). Computers in Schools: Changing Pedagogies.Australian Educational Computing, 16(2), 14–17.Google Scholar
  7. Godfrey, C. (2001b). Computer Technologies: Scaffolding Tools for Teaching and Learning.Australian Educational Computing, 16(2), 27–29.Google Scholar
  8. Heller, J. F. (1982).Faculty and Administrative Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Hertzke, E. R., & Olson, W. E. (1994).TQE, Technology and Teaching. California: Corwin Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, A. (2002). School Reform and Professional Development.Phi Delta Kappan, 83(7), 488–489.Google Scholar
  11. Mann, J. (2002). IT Education’s Failure to Deliver Successful Information Systems: Not is the Time to Address the ITUser Gap.Journal of Information Technology Education, 1(4), 253–267.Google Scholar
  12. McKinnon, D. (1996). Professional Development in Context.Australian Educational Computing.11(1),12–16.Google Scholar
  13. Newhouse, P. (2001). Wireless Portable Technology Unlocks the Potential for Computers to Support Learning in Primary Schools.Australian Educational Computing, 16(2), 6–13.Google Scholar
  14. Ng, W., & Gunstone, R. (2003). Science and Computer-based Technologies: attitudes of secondary science teachers.Research in Science and Technological Education, 21(2), 243–263. Salisbury, D. F. (1996).Five Technologies for Educational Change. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Trinidad, S., MacNish, J., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2004).Integrating ICT into the Learning Environment at Sevenoaks Senior College: How Teachers and Students use Technology in Teaching and Learning. Retrieved October 15, 2004, from ald01027.htm.Google Scholar
  16. Vitolo, T., & Coulston, C. (2002). Taxonomy of Information Literacy Competencies.Journal of Information Technology Education, 1(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Whitaker, B., & Coste, T. G. (2002). Developing an Effective IT Integration and Support System.Journal of Information Technology Education, 1(1), 55–63.Google Scholar
  18. Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2000). Teachers and ICT: current use and future needs.British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Williams, D. (2002). Improving use of learning technologies in higher education through participant oriented evaluations.Educational Technology and Society, 5(3), 11–17.Google Scholar
  20. Wilson, B. (1995). Successful Technology Integration in an Elementary School: A Case Study.Practitioners write the book: What works in educational technology. Denton, Texas: Texas Center for Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  21. Yuen, A. (2003). Fostering Learning Communities in Classrooms: A Case Study of Hongkong Schools.Education Media International. Retrieved October 17, 2004, from Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Santo Tomas Center for Educational Research and Development and ProfessorCollege of Education and Graduate SchoolEspaña, ManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations