Operational Research

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 465–480 | Cite as

A critical examination of the advantages and disadvantages of the E — Insurance and how they explain its small penetration in the Greek Market

  • Despina C. Anargiridou
  • Savas C. Anargiridis
  • Demetrios L. Papadopoulos
Regular Papers


E-insurance covers the web-based enterprises from attacks; it offers data protection, coverage for loss of intellectual property and commercial property insurance programs. The terms and the conditions of the insurance packages are set out via the internet. Besides, the insured receives the contracts and the compensation online. The purpose of this paper is twofold:first, to provide a critical examination of the main advantages and disadvantages of the e-insurance. More specifically, we point the great facility it offers to customers as regards to its operational hours and the fact that the insurance became accessible to everyone. On the other hand, the greatest obstacles for the growth of the e-insurance systems are related with the absence of a single legal framework in a global level, with the required technology, the insufficient operational processes, the difficulty to determine the value of the confidential data, the fact that the users are cautious about the security that is offered and the difficulty in the communication between all participants.Second, to investigate the degree to which these advantages and disadvantages can explain the small penetration of the e-insurance in the Greek Market. To accomplish this, we have considered the evolution of insurance and e-insurance in Greece and the cases of Greek web sites which provide insurance services. This analysis enables us to explain the low penetration of the e-insurance in Greece and proposes the required actions that should be taken by the Greek insurance companies, which provide insurance services online, to be competitive.


E-insurance risks safety premium carrier 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anargiridou D., Anargiridis S. and Papadopoulos D. (2006). “A critical examination of the advantages and disadvantages of the e-insurance and the extend to which they pertain to its penetration worldwide and particularly in Greece”, in Proc. of the 18th National Conference on Operational Research, Kozani, Greece.Google Scholar
  2. Anargiridou D. and Papadopoulos D. (2004). “The advantages and disadvantages of the e-banking and the extend to which they pertain to the Greek Banks”, in Proc. of the 5th International Congress in Sheffield Enterprise Partnership in Europe, England.Google Scholar
  3. Anargiridou D. and Papadopoulos D. (2004). “The advantages and disadvantages of the e-stock exchange transactions and the extend to which they pertain to the Greek Banks”, in Proc. of the 3rd WSEAS International Conference on E-ACTIVITIES, Rethymno.Google Scholar
  4. Anargiridou D. and Papadopoulos D. (2005). “A critical examination of the advantages and disadvantages of the e-bond transactions and the extend to which they pertain to the issuing of bonds worldwide”, in Proc. of the IADIS International Conference, WWW/Internet 2005, Lisbon.Google Scholar
  5. Baur, E., Birkmaier, U. & Rüstmann M. (2001). “The economic importance of insurance in Central and Eastern Europe and the impact of globalisation and e-business”, Committee for trade, Industry and Enterprise Development, Fifth session, Item 4 of the provisional agenda.Google Scholar
  6. Bisker J. (2003). “Update on internet insurance”, TowerGroup, IBM Financial Services, Building an Edge, pp 123 -125.Google Scholar
  7. Boyle C. E. (2001). “New Capital Boosts Bermuda’s Reinsurance Industry”, Insurance Journal.Google Scholar
  8. Duffy D. (2000). “Cyberinsurance”, The professional Organization for CIOS.Google Scholar
  9. Jäntti, M. (2005). “The rationale for building a Business case in software development, a case study”, Proceedings of the 28th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia.Google Scholar
  10. Järvinen, R.., Eriksson, P., Saastamoinen, M., and Lystimäki, M. (2001). “Insurance in the Net — The offerings of insurance companies and the expectations of consumers”, Kuluttajatutkimuskeskus, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  11. Harvey M., (2001). “Of human bonding”, Financial Times, Scholar
  12. Kathy Ford, Economist Intelligence Unit & Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp (2001). “E-insurance: Creating a Competitive Advantage”, ISBN: 9780862181758.Google Scholar
  13. Kesan J., Majuca R. and Yurcik W. (2004). “The Economic Case for Cyberinsurance”, University of Illinois Legal Working Paper Series. University of Illinois Law and Economics Working Papers, Working Paper 2.Google Scholar
  14. Landberg S. (2005), “Taking Advantage of the Insurance E-Revolution”, Principal, Nextera Interactive.Google Scholar
  15. Malone C. E. and Hunt L. H (2000). “e-Insurance. The Convergence of Insurance, Technology and Capital”, Report by Friedman, Billings, Ramsey ⇐p; Co.Google Scholar
  16. Maurice, A. (1998). “Insurance frustrates online shoppers, National Underwriter/Life & Health Financial services”, Vol. 102, Issue 49.Google Scholar
  17. Meyer, S and Krohm, G (1999). “An Overview of Regulatory Developments of Insurance Transactions on the Internet”, Journal of Insurance Regulation, Vol 17(4).Google Scholar
  18. Mitchell, R. (2000). “Reputation Critical to Internet Success”, National Underwriter, Vol 104 (25), pp 19.Google Scholar
  19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002). “E-insurance”, Workshop on insurance and private pensions in the Baltic States, By OECD Secretariat.Google Scholar
  20. Reich-Hale, D. (1999). “Doubts Expressed on Online Insurance Sales”, National Underwriter, Vol 103 (3), pp 26.Google Scholar
  21. Rowen H. (2000), “E-Commerce and Insurance:A California Perspective”, E-insurance.Google Scholar
  22. SIGMA (2001). “The Impact Of E-Business on the Insurance Industry: Pressure to Adapt - Chance to Reinvent”, No. 5, Zurich.Google Scholar
  23. Sweeney K. A. (2001). “Don’t Tell Anyone, but E-Insurance is Alive and Well”, Insurance Journal.Google Scholar
  24. The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited and PricewaterhouseCoopers (2001). “E-insurance, Creating a competitive advantage”, Executive Briefing.Google Scholar
  25. Thieme R. (2001). “What Insurance Can — and Can’t — Do for Security Risks”, Secure Business Quarterly, Vol. One, Issue Two, pp.1–5, @stake publication. Trembly, A. C. (1998). “Insurers failing to meet consumer demand on internet selling. National Underwriter/Property ⇐p; Casualty Risk ⇐p; Benefits”, Vol. 102, Issue 5.Google Scholar
  26. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2002). “E-Commerce and development, E-Insurance”, Internet version REPORT 2002, UNCTAD secretariat.Google Scholar
  27. Williams, C. (2001). “Determining Your Net Worth”, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hellenic Operational Research Society 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Despina C. Anargiridou
    • 1
  • Savas C. Anargiridis
    • 1
  • Demetrios L. Papadopoulos
    • 2
  1. 1.Accounting and Finance DepartmentUniversity of MacedoniaThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Accounting and Finance DepartmentUniversity of MacedoniaThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations