Reporting research results: A moral obligation for all researchers


Présenter les résultats de recherche: Une obligation morale pour tous les chercheurs


  1. 1.
    Rennie D. CONSORT revised - improving the reporting of randomized trials. JAMA 2001; 285: 2006–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Enron. Available from URL; http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Enron (accessed, 31st January 2007).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sterling TD, Rosenbaum WL, Weinkam JJ. Publication decisions revisited: the effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice versa. Am Stat 1995; 49: 108–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hall R, de Antueno C, Webber A. Publication bias in the medical literature: a review by a Canadian Research Ethics Board. Can J Anesth 2007; 54: 380–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 272: 158–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dickersin K. Publication bias: recognizing the problem, understanding its origins and scope, and preventing harm.In: Rothstein H, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M (Eds). Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis — Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons; 2005: 11–33.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahoney MJ. Publication prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognit Ther Res 1977; 1: 161–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stern JM, Simes RJ. Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. BMJ 1997; 315: 640–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ 2003; 326: 1167–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simes RJ. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 1529–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan AW, Krleza-Jeric K, Schmid I, Altman DG. Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CMAJ 2004; 171: 735–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004; 291: 2457–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pildal J, Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Forfang E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study. BMJ 2005; 330: 1049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Easterbrook PJ. Directory of registries of clinical trials. Stat Med 1992; 11: 345–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whittington CJ, Kendall T, Fonagy P, Cottrell D, Cotgrove A, Boddington E. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data. Lancet 2004; 363: 1341–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    New York State. Press releases. Available from URL; aug26a_04.html (accessed, January 31st 2007).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deangelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al.;International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Is this clinical trial fully registered? A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 2005; 293: 2927–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    World Health Organization. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Available from URL; http:// (accessed 31st January 2007).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Drazen JM, Zarin DA. Salvation by registration. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 184–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology and Community MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Chalmers Research Group, Rm 210CHEO Research InstituteOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations