Advertisement

Contemporary Jewry

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 21–57 | Cite as

The implications of potential boundaries and definitions for understanding American Jewry: Can one size fit all?

  • Frank L. Mott
  • Diane B. Patel
Article
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

This paper utilizes data from the 2000–2001 National Jewish Population Survey to explore (1) the extent that alternate Jewish population boundaries and related concepts impact on interpretations of American Jewry and (2) tradeoffs between population size, population characteristics, and the potential dynamics of population change based on defining the population more or less broadly. The focus is on how alternative boundaries and definitions impact not only on population size, but intermarriage and Jewish child raising propensities for individuals passing through the childbearing years.

Keywords

Jewish Community Jewish Population Jewish Identity Contemporary JEWRY National Jewish Population Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alba, Richard. 2006. “On the Sociological Significance of the American Jewish Experience: Boundary Blurring, Assimilation, and Pluralism.”Sociology of Religion 67:347–358.Google Scholar
  2. BershtelSara and AllengnGraubard.1992.itSaving Remnants: Feeling Jewish in America. Berkeley, CA: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Breslauer, Daniel S. 2001.Creating a Judaism without Religion. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Chiswick, Barry R. 2002. “American Jewry: An Economic Perspective and Research Agenda.”Contemporary Jewry 23:156–182. Chiswick, Carmel. 1998. “The Economics of Contemporary American Jewish Family Life.”Studies in Contemporary Jewry 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, Steven. 2001. “Response to Charles Liebman’s ‘Some Research Proposals for the Study of American Jews’”.Contemporary Jewry 22:115–119.Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, Lynn. 1991.Tradition in a Rootless World: Women Turn to Orthodox Judaism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Della Pergola, Sergio. 2002. “World Jewish Population 2002. ” pp. 601–642 inAmerican Jewish Year Book 2002 vol. 102, edited by D. Singer and L. Grossman. New York: American Jewish Committee.Google Scholar
  8. Fishman, Sylvia Barack. 2004.Double or Nothing?: Jewish Families and Mixed Marriage. Lebanon, NH:Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goldscheider, Calvin. 2002. “Social Science and the Jews: A Research Agenda”Contemporary Jewry 23:196–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartman, Moshe,and Harriet Hartman. 1996.Gender Equality and American Jews. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hartman, Harriet, and Deborah Kaufman. 2006. “Decentering the Study of Jewish Identity: Opening the Dialogue with Other Religious Groups.”Sociology of Religion 67: 365–385.Google Scholar
  12. Heilman, Samuel C. 2003–2004. “American Jews and Community: A Spectrum of Possibilities.”Contemporary Jewry 24:51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hurst, Dawn S., and Frank L.Mott. 2006. “Secular Pay-Offs to Religious Origins: Gender Differences among American Jews.”Sociology of Religion 67:439–463.Google Scholar
  14. Kieval, Hillel. 2003–2004. “Introduction: Jewish Experiences of America.”Contemporary Jewry 24:ix-xiii.Google Scholar
  15. Klaff, Vivian. 2006. “Defining American Jewry from Religious and Ethnic Perspectives: The Transition to Greater Heterogeneity.”Sociology of Religion 67:415–438.Google Scholar
  16. Klaff, VivianZ. 1998. Broken Down by Age and Sex: Projecting the American Jewish Population.Contemporary Jewry 19:2–37.Google Scholar
  17. Klaff, Vivian, and Frank L. Mott. 2005. NJPS 2000/01: A Vehicle for Exploring Social Structure and Social Dynamics in the Jewish Population.Contemporary Jewry 25:226–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kotler-Berkowitz, Laurence. 2006. “An Introduction to the National Jew- ish Population Survey 2000-01.”Sociology of Religion 67:387–390.Google Scholar
  19. Kroll, Lynn Korda. 1994.Jewish Community Services to the Intermarried: Report of the Task Force on the Intermarried and Jewish Affiliation. New York, NY: Council of Jewish Federations.Google Scholar
  20. Liebman, Charles S., and Steven M. Cohen. 1990.Two Worlds of Judaism: The Israeli and American Experience. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Liebman, Charles S. 2001. “Some Research Proposals for the Study of American Jews.”Contemporary Jewry 22:99–114.Google Scholar
  22. Linzer, Norman, David Schnall, and Jerome Chanes, editors. 1998.A Portrait of the American Jewish Community. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  23. Phillips, Bruce. 2005. “Assimilation, Transformation, and the Long Range Impact of Intermarriage.”Contemporary Jewry 25:50–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillips, Bruce. 2006. “The Legacy of Egon Mayer in the Study of American Jewish Intermarriage.”Contemporary Jewry 26:169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarna, Jonathan D. 2004.American Judaism: A History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Semans, Maureen P., and Linda Stone Fish. 2000. “Dissecting Life with a Jewish Scalpel: A Qualitative Analysis of Jewish-Centered Family Life.”Family Process 39:121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. United JewishCommunities. 2003.The National Jewish Population Survey 2000-01: Strength, Challenge and Diversity in the American Jewish Population. New York, NY: The Mandell L. Berman Institute, North American Jewish Data Bank.Google Scholar
  28. Waite, Linda J. 2002. “The American Jewish Family: What We Know, What We Need to Know.”Contemporary Jewry 23:35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Waxman, Chaim I. 2002. “What We Don’t Know about the Judaism of America’s Jews.”Contemporary Jewry 23:72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer SBM B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbus

Personalised recommendations