Advertisement

Acta Endoscopica

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 39–43 | Cite as

Intérêt des produits de contraste en échoendoscopie

  • M. S. Bhutani
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Résumé

Les agents de contraste pour l'ultrasonographie constituent un domaine qui s'est rapidement développé avec l'apparition de multiples agents de contraste qui ont été testés et développés pour rehausser l'ultrasonographie extra-corporelle et les images échocardiographiques Quelques données apparaissent actuellement sur l'utilisation des agents de contraste au cours de l'ultrasonographie endoscopique. Cet article fera le survol des agents de contraste, discutera des données disponibles à ce jour sur l'emploi de ces agents au cours de l'endosonographie et fournira un aperçu des usages cliniques potentiels des agents de contraste rehaussant l'endosonographie.

Mots-clés

échoendoscopie produits de contraste 

Contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound

Summary

The field of contrast agents for ultrasound is rapidly evolving with multiple contrast agents being tested and developed for enhancement of extra-corporeal ultrasound and echocardiographic images. There is some emerging, data now on the use of contrast agents during endoscopic ultrasound. This paper provides an overview of ultrasound contrast agents, discusses the data available so far on the use of these agents during endosonography, and provides an insight into the potential clinical uses of contrast enhanced endosonography.

Key-words

contrast agents endoscopic ultrasound 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. 1.
    GRAMIAK R., SHAH P.M. — Echocardiography of the aortic root.Invest. Radial., 1968,3, 356–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    MELTZER R.S., TICKNER G., SAHINES T.P.et al. — The source of the ultrasound contrast effect.J. Clin. Ultrasound, 1980,8, 121–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    BARNHART J., LEVENE H., VILLAPANDO E.et al. — Characteristics of Albunex; Air filled albumin microspheres for echocardiography contrast enhancement.Invest. Radial., 1990,25, S162-S164.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    FEINSTEIN S.B., CHEIRIF J., FOLKERT J.T.et al. — Safety and efficacy of a new transpulmonary contrast agent. Initial multicenter clinical results.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 1990,16, 316–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    NEIDICH R.L., RECCHIA D., EDMUNDOWICZ S.A. — intravenous injection of sonicated albumin produces vascular enhancement during endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) (abstract).Gastrointest. Endosc., 1994,40, P68.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    HIROOKA Y., NAITOH Y., GOTO H.et al. — Usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography with intravenous injection of sonicated serum albumin.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1997,46, 166–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    HIROOKA Y., GOTO H., ITO A.et al. — Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in pancreatic diseases: a preliminary study.Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1998,93, 632–635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    HIROOKA Y., NAITOH Y., GOTO H.et al. — Contrastenhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in gall bladder diseases.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1998,48, 406–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    FRITZSCH T., HILMANN J., KÄMPFE M.et al. — SHU508, A transpulmonary echo-contrast agent: initial experience.Invest. Radiol., 1990,25, S160-S161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    BHUTANI M.S., HOFFMAN B.J., VAN VELSE A.et al. — Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography with galactose microparticles: SHU508A (Levovist).Endoscopy, 1997,29, 635–639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    BHUTANI M.S., HOFFMAN B.J., VAN VELSE A.et al. — SHU508A (galactose microparticles as a contrast-agent during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) (abstract).Gastrointest. Endosc., 1996,43, 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    BHUTANI M.S. — Contrast agents for endoscopic ultrasound (letter).Gastrointest. Endosc., 1998,47, 324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ERNST H., BALZER T., HAHN E.G.et al. — Ultrasound contrast agent SHU508A and color Doppler endosonography of esophageal varices (abstract).Gastroenterology, 1994,106, A888.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    MATSUDA Y., YABUUCHI I. — Hepatic tumors: US contrast enhancement with CO2 microbubbles.Radiology, 1991,179, 333–342.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    KUDO M., TOMITO S., TOCHIO H.et al. — Small hepatocellular carcacinoma: Diagnosis with US angiography with intraarterial CO2 microbubbles.Radiology, 1992,182, 155–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    KUDO M., TOMITA S., TOCHIO H.et al. — Sonography with intra-arterial infusion of carbon dioxide microbubbles (sonographic augiography): Value in differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors.Am. J. Roentgenol., 1992,158, 65–74.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    KATO T., TSUKAMOTO Y., NAITOH Y.et al. — Ultrasonographic angiography in gall bladder diseases.Acta Radiologica, 1994,35, 606–613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    KATO T., TSUKAMOTO Y., NAITOH Y.et al. — Ultrasonographic and endoscopic ultrasonographic angiography in pancreatic mass lesions.Acta Radiologica, 1995,36, 381–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    KOJIMA S., GOTO H., HIROOKA Y.et al. — Contrast echolymphography using EUS-guided puncture. 11th International Symposium on Endoscopic Ultrasonography. Program and Abstracts, Kyoto, Japan. 1998, P55.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    MIZUKAMI Y., SAITO H., ARISATO S.et al. — Dynamic contrast-enhanced intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS), for the diagnosis of extent of biliary malignancies 11th International symposium on Endoscopic Ultrasonography, Program and Abstracts, Kyoto, Japan. 1998, P-69.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    BHUTANI M.S., BARDE C.J. — Contrast-enhanced gastrointestinal trans-abdominal and endoscopic ultrasonography: An idea whose time has come.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1997,92, 1976–1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. S. Bhutani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MedicineUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations