Dextromethorphan attenuation of postoperative pain and primary and secondary thermal hyperalgesia

  • Avi A. Weinbroum
  • Alexander Gorodezky
  • David Niv
  • Ron Ben-Abraham
  • Valery Rudick
  • Amir Szold
Regional Anesthesia And Pain


Purpose: To determine the effect of 90 mg dextromethorphan (DM)po vs placebo 90 min preoperatively, on the immediate and delayed postoperative course.

Methods: Thirty patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy or inguinal hernioplasty under general anesthesia were studied. Half (DM) received 90 mg dextromethorphan and half received placebo 90 min before anesthesia. Intravenous Patient Controlled Aanalgesia with morphine was available for two hours within a six-hour observation period; 75 mg diclofenacim prn was given later in PACU and on-ward (24 hr). Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scales. Thermal thresholds for cold and hot sensation and for pain (by limit method) were evaluated at the site of skin incision (primary-) and distantly (secondary hyperalgesia). Von Frey filaments were applied testing touch sensation. Sedation level and morphine consumption were also assessed in PACU.

Results: Demographic, surgical and perioperative parameters were similar; no untoward effects were encountered. Pain intensity and sedation were lower, and the feeling of well-being was greater, in the DM patients: onevs five (median), twovs five, fivevs two, respectively,P<0.01 (90 min time-point). Thermal application revealed absence of primary and secondary hyperalgesia only in the DM patients; von Frey filaments induced similar pain sensation in both groups. Mean morphine/group, morphine/weight and diclofenac injection rates were ∼55% lower in the DM group: 2.1±1.2 (SD)vs 4.7±2.3, 0.03±0.02vs 0.07±0.03, 1.0±0.3vs 2.4±0.2, respectively,P<0.01.

Conclusions: Compared with placebo, DM enabled reduction of postoperative analgesics consumption, improved well-being, and reduced sedation, pain intensity and primary and secondary thermal hyperalgesia.


Morphine Pain Intensity Dextromethorphan Post Anesthesia Care Unit Morphine Consumption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Objectif: Déterminer l’effet de 90 mg de dextrométhorphane (DM)po vs un placebo, administrés 90 min avant l’opération, sur l’évolution postopératoire immédiate et tardive.

Méthode: L’étude a porté sur 30 patients devant subir une cholécystectomie laparoscopique ou un hernioplastie inguinale. La moitié a reçu 90 mg de dextrométhorphane et l’autre moitié, un placebo, 90 min avant le début de l’anesthésie générale. La morphine, en qualité d’analgésie intraveineuse autocontrôlée, a été disponible pendant deux heures sur une période d’observation de six heures; 75 mg de diclofénacim prn ont été administrés plus tard à la salle de réveil et à la chambre (24 h). La douleur a été évalué grâce à l’échelle visuelle analogique. Les seuils thermiques de sensation au froid et à la chaleur ainsi qu’à la douleur (selon une méthode du seuil différentiel) ont été évalués au site de l’incision cutanée (hyperalgésie primaire) et à distance (hyperalgésie secondaire). Des filaments von Frey ont été appliqués pour tester le toucher. On a aussi évalué, à la salle de réveil, le niveau de sédation et la consommation de morphine.

Résultats: Les paramètres démographiques, chirurgicaux et périopératoires ont été similaires: aucun effet indésirable n’a été noté. L’intensité de la douleur et de la sédation a été plus faible, et le confort meilleur, chez les patients du groupe DM: unvs cinq (médiane), deuxvs cinq, cinqvs deux, respectivement,P<0,01 (90 min après le début de l’analgésie). L’épreuve de sensibilité thermique a révélé l’absence d’hyperalgésie primaire et secondaire chez les patients du groupe DM seulement; les filaments von Frey ont induit une sensation de douleur similaire chez les patients des deux groupes. La consommation moyenne de morphine selon le groupe et selon le poids des patients ainsi que les taux d’injection de diclofénac ont été de ∼55% plus bas dans le groupe DM: 2,1±1,2 (écart type)vs 4,7±2,3; 0,03±0,02vs 0,07±0,03; 1,0±0,3vs 2,4±0,2, respectivement,P<0,01.

Conclusion: Comparé à un placebo, le DM a permis de réduire la consommation d’analgésiques postopératoires, a amélioré le confort et a réduit la sédation, l’intensité de la douleur et l’hyperalgésie thermique primaire et secondaire.


  1. 1.
    Woolf CJ, Thompson SWN. The induction and maintenance of central sensitization is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activation: implications for the treatment of post-injury pain hypersensitivity states. Pain 1991; 44: 293–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klepstad P, Maurset A, Moberg ER, Øye I. Evidence of a role for NMDA receptors in pain perception. Eur J Pharmacol 1990; 187: 513–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dikenson AH. A cure for wind up: NMDA receptors antagonists as potential analgesics. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1990; 11: 307–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Woolf CJ. Windup and central sensitization are not equivalent (Editorial). Pain 1996, 66: 105–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Albers GW, Sáenz RE, Moses JA Jr. Tolerability of oral dextromethorphan in patient with a history of brain ischemia. Clin Neuropharmacol 1992; 15: 509–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Price DD, Mao J, Frenk H, Mayer DJ. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan selectively reduces temporal summation of second pain in man. Pain 1994; 59: 165–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell JN, Raja SN, Meyer RA, Mackinnon SE. Myelinated afferents signal the hyperalgesia associated with nerve injury. Pain 1988; 32: 89–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Felsby S, Nielsen J, Arendt-Nielsen L, Jensen TS. NMDA receptor blockade in chronic neuropathic pain: a comparison of ketamine and magnesium chloride. Pain 1995; 64: 283–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fruhstorfer H, Lindblom U, Schmidt WG. Method for quantitative estimation of thermal thresholds in patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1976; 39: 1071–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yarnitsky D, Ochoa JL. Warm and cold specific somatosensory systems. Psychophysical thresholds, reaction times and peripheral conduction velocities. Brain 1991; 114: 1819–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansen S, Jamal GA, Weir AI, Ballantyne JP, Bissessar EA. An instrument for measurement of thermal thresholds in man. Biosensors 1987–88; 3: 391–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mussachio JM, Klein M. Dextromethorphan binding sites in the guinea pig brain. Cell Mol Neurobiol 1988; 8: 149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Church J, Lodge D, Berry SC. Differential effects of dextromethorphan and levorphanol on the excitation of rat spinal neurons by amino acids. Eur J Pharmacol 1985; 111: 185–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Church J, Shacklock JA, Baimbridge KG. Dextromethorphan and phencyclidine receptor ligands: differential effects on K+ and NMDA-evoked increases in cytosolic free Ca+2 concentration. Neurosci Lett 1991; 124: 232–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weinbroum AA, Rudick V, Paret G, Ben-Abraham R. The role of dextromethorphan in pain control. Can J Anesth 2000 47: 585–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chia Y-Y, Liu K, Chow LH, Lee T-Y. The preemptive administration of intravenous dextromethorphan reduces postoperative morphine consumption. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 748–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hendersen DJ, Withington BS, Wilson JA, Morrison LMM. Perioperative dextromethorphan reduces post-operative pain after hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rose JB, Cuy R, Cohen DE, Schreiner MS. Preoperative oral dextromethorphan does not reduced pain or analgesic consumption in children after adenotosillectomy. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 749–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grace RF, Power I, Umedaly H, et al. Preoperative dextromethorphan reduces intraoperative but not postoperative morphine requirements after laparotomy. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 1135–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hylden JLK, Nahin RL, Traub RJ, Dubner R. Expansion of receptive fields of spinal lamina I projection neurons in rats with unilateral adjuvant-induced inflammation: the contribution of dorsal horn mechanisms. Pain 1989; 37: 229–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central compoennt of postinjury pain hypersensitivity. Nature 1983; 306: 686–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cook AJ, Woolf CJ, Wall PD, McMahon SB. Dynamic receptive field plasticity in rat spinal cord dorsal horn following C-primary afferent inputs. Nature 1987; 325: 151–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kauppila T, Grönroos M, Pertovaara A. An attempt to attenuate experimental pain in humans by dextromethorphan, an NMDA receptor antagonist. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1995; 52: 641–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McConaghy PM, McSorley P, McCaughey W, Campbell WI. Dextromethorphan and pain after total abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 731–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tverskoy M, Oz Y, Isakson A, Finger J, Bradley EL Jr,Kissin I. Preemptive effect of fentanyl and ketamine on postoperative pain and wound hyperalgesia. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 205–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Woodworth JR, Denis SRK, Moore L, Rotenberg KS. The polymorphic metabolism of dextromethorphan. J Clin Pharmacol 1987; 27: 139–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avi A. Weinbroum
    • 1
    • 4
  • Alexander Gorodezky
    • 4
  • David Niv
    • 2
  • Ron Ben-Abraham
    • 1
  • Valery Rudick
    • 4
  • Amir Szold
    • 3
  1. 1.From the Post-AnesthesiaTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.the Pain Control UnitsTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.the Endoscopic Surgery ServiceTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  4. 4.the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care MedicineTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations