Survey of chronic pain practice by anesthesiologists in Canada

Regional anesthesia and pain



To describe the pattern of chronic pain practice (CPP) among anesthesiologists in Canada.


Following hospital Ethics Committee approval, a detailed postal questionnaire was sent to all active members of the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society. A second mailing was conducted two months later.


The overall response rate was 53%. While 38% of responding anesthesiologists were involved in CPP, in the majority of cases, this accounted for less than 20% of their clinical time. Thirty percent of those involved in CPP had previous training in pain management. The types of CPP included nerve blocks (84%) and pharmacological treatment (60%) in non-cancer pain (85%) and cancer pain (50%) patients. Ten percent and 28% of anesthesiologists were involved in research and teaching respectively while 26% were affiliated with a multidisciplinary clinic. The healthcare professions that anesthesiologists had access to or were directly working with in their practice were as follows: acupuncture (18%), nursing (36%), psychology (28%), psychiatry (35%) and physiotherapy (58%). Epidural steroid injection was the most commonly practiced intervention (82%). This was followed by trigger point injection (70%), stellate ganglion block (61%), occipital nerve block (60%) and lumbar sympathetic block (50%). Practice of interventional procedures was highly diverse.

Seventy percent of anesthesiologists prescribed opioids as part of their CPP. However, half of them never incorporated an opioid agreement with patients. Opioids were most commonly used in the sustained release form.


Approximately one-third of anesthesiologists surveyed incorporate chronic pain in their practice and their pattern of practice is widely diversified.


Décrire le modèle de pratique en douleur chronique (PDC) des anesthésiologistes du Canada.


Avec l’accord du Comité d’éthique, nous avons posté un questionnaire détaillé aux membres actifs de la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes. Un second envoi a été fait deux mois plus tard.


Le taux de réponse global a été de 53 %. Si 38 % des répondants étaient impliqués dans la PDC, dans la majorité des cas, c’était pour moins de 20 % du temps de clinique. Parmi les personnes en PDC, 30 % avaient reçu une formation en traitement de la douleur.

Les modalités de PDC comprennent les blocs nerveux (84 %) et un traitement pharmacologique (60 %) pour la douleur non cancéreuse (85 %) et cancéreuse (50 %). Dix pour cent et 28 % des anesthésiologistes ont respectivement participé à la recherche et à l’enseignement, et 26 % ont été associés à une clinique multidisciplinaire. Les professions de la santé auxquelles les anesthésiologistes avaient accès ou avec lesquelles ils ont travaillé directement sont : l’acupuncture (18 %), les soins infirmiers (36 %), la psychologie (28 %), la psychiatrie (35 %) et la physiothérapie (58 %).

L’injection péridurale de stéroïde était l’intervention la plus fréquente (82 %). C’était suivi de l’injection dans une zone réflexogène (70 %), du bloc du ganglion stellaire (61 %), du bloc du nerf occipital (60 %) et du bloc lombaire sympathique (50 %). La pratique de procédures interventionnelles était très diversifiée.

Soixante-dix pour cent des anesthésiologistes prescrivaient des opioïdes dans leur PDC. Mais la moitié d’entre eux n’ont jamais intégré d’entente pour opiacés avec leurs patients. Ces médicaments étaient utilisés le plus souvent dans leur formulation à libération lente.


Environ un tiers des anesthésiologistes sondés incluent la douleur chronique dans leur pratique et leur modèle de pratique est largement diversifié.


Chronic Pain Nerve Block Cancer Pain Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Epidural Steroid Injection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
[Enquête sur la pratique en douleur chronique des anesthésiologistes du Canada]


  1. 1.
    Haddox JD, Bonica JJ. Evolution of the speciality of pain medicine and the multidisciplinary approach to pain. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO (Eds). Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998: 1113–34.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson P. Comprehensive pain rehabilitation program: a North American perspective. In: Jensen TS, Wilson PR, Rice ASC (Eds). Clinical Pain Management: Chronic Pain, 1st ed. London: Arnold; 2003: 163–72.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jenkins K, Wong D. A survey of professional satisfaction among Canadian anesthesiologists. Can J Anesth 2001; 48:637–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breen TW, McNeil T, Dierenfield L. Obstetric anesthesia practice in Canada. Can J Anesth 2000; 47:1230–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walsh E. Epidural steroid injections for back pain and sciatica. In: Breivik H, Campbell W, Eccleston C (Eds). Clinical Pain Management: Practical Applications and Procedures, 1st ed. London: Arnold; 2003: 417–30.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abram SE. Treatment of lumbosacral radiculopathy with epidural steroids. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:1937–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cluff R, Mehio AK, Cohen SP, Chang Y, Sang CN, Stojanovic MP. The technical aspects of epidural steroid injections: a national survey. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:403–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abram SE, O’Connor TC. Complications associated with epidural steroid injections. Reg Anesth 1996; 21:149–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peng PW, Smedstad KG. Litigation in Canada against anesthesiologists practicing regional anesthesia. A review of closed claims. Can J Anesth 2000; 47:105–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fitzgibbon DR, Posner KL, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Chronic pain management. American Society of Anesthesiologists closed claims project. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:98–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edmonds LC, Vance ML, Hughes JM. Morbidity from paraspinal depo corticosteroid injections for analgesia: Cushing’s syndrome and adrenal suppression. Anesth Analg 1991; 72:820–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kay J, Findling JW, Raff H. Epidural triamcinolone suppresses the pituitary-adrenal axis in human subjects. Anesth Analg 1994; 79:501–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Usubiaga JE, Usubiaga LE, Brea LM, Goyena R. Effect of saline injections on epidural and subarachnoid space pressures and relation to postspinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1967; 46:293–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Purdy EP, Ajimal GS. Vision loss after lumbar epidural steroid injection. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:119–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boas RA. Sympathetic nerve blocks: in search of a role. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998; 23:292–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Breivik H. Sympathetic blocks. In: Breivik H, Campbell W, Eccleston C (Eds). Clinical Pain Management: Practical Applications and Procedures, 1st ed. London: Arnold; 2003:233–46.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rocco AG, Palombi D, Raeke D. Anatomy of the lumbar sympathetic chain. Reg Anesth 1995; 20:13–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Breivik H, Cousins MJ, Löfström JB. Sympathetic neural blockade of upper and lower extremity. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO (Eds). Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998: 411–50.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cherry DA, Rao DM. Lumbar sympathetic and coeliac plexus blocks. An anatomical study in cadavers. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54:1037–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Slipman CW, Bhat AL, Gilchrist RV, Issac Z, Chou L, Lenrow DA. A critical review of the evidence for the use of zygapophysial injections and radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of low back pain. Spine J 2003; 3:310–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dreyfuss P, Dreyer SJ. Lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint injections. Spine J 2003; 3(Suppl):50S-9SS.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marks RC, Houston T, Thulbourne T. Facet joint injection and facet nerve block: a randomised comparison in 86 patients with chronic low back pain. Pain 1992; 49:325–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dreyfuss P, Schwarzer AC, Lau P, Bogduk N. Specificity of lumbar medial branch and L5 dorsal ramus blocks. A computed tomography study. Spine 1997; 22:895–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N. The false-positive rate of uncontrolled diagnostic blocks of the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Pain 1994; 58:195–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moulin DE, Clark AJ, Speechley M, Morley-Forster PK. Chronic pain in Canada -prevalence, treatment, impact and the role of opioid analgesia. Pain Res Manage 2002; 7:179–84.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jovey RD, Ennis J, Gardner-Nix J, et al. Use of opioid analgesics for the treatment of chronic noncancer pain - a consensus statement and guidelines from the Canadian Pain Society, 2002. Pain Res Manage 2003; 8(Suppl A); 3A-14A.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Portenoy RK, Foley KM. Chronic use of opioid analgesics in non-malignant pain: report of 38 cases. Pain 1986; 25:171–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McQuay H. Opioids in pain management. Lancet 1999; 353:2229–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anonymous. The use of opioids for the treatment of chronic pain. A consensus statement from the American Academy of Pain Medicine and the American Pain Society. Clin J Pain 1997; 13: 6—8.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fishman SM, Kreis PG. The opioid contract. Clin J Pain 2002; 18:S70-S5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain ManagementUniversity Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Wasser Pain Management Center, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations