Skip to main content
Log in

The sea beet (Beta vulgaris L. ssp.maritima) of the adriatic coast as source of resistance for sugar beet

  • Letter to the editor
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

The sea beet is considered the ancestral species from which the different types of cultivated beet originate. Its hybridation is easy because of its evolutionary proximity, unlike with other species of the GenusBeta. These traits have long made the sea beet the subject of research aimed at targeting and isolating its useful characters which could then be transferred to cultivated beet.

The sea beet collected at the mouth of the Po di Levante river in the early 1900s has given more appreciable results than any of the other biotypes from different origins. Indeed, it was from this biotype that today’s most developed genetic resistance to serious diseases such as cercospora and rhizomania was isolated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bartsch, D., Lehnen, M., Clegg, J., Pohl-Orf, M., Schupan, I. and Ellstrand, N.C. (1999). Impact of gene flow from cultivated beet on genetic diversity of wild seed beet populations.Molecular Ecology,8: 1733–1741.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barzen, E., Stahl, R., Fuchs, E., Borchardt, D.C. and Salamini, F. (1997). Development of coupling-repulsion-phase SCAR markers diagnostic for the sugar beet Rrl allele conferring resitance to rhizomania.Mol. Breed,3: 231–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi, E. and De Biaggi, M. (1980).Beta maritima L. in the Po Delta. Atti Convegno in Commemorazione di Ottavio Munerati, Rovigo, 5–6 ottobre 1979, 181–185.

  • Biancardi, E. and Mandolino, G. (1997). Ľimpollinazione e ľisolamento spaziale della barbabietola da zucchero.Sementi Elette,43: 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongiovanni, G.C., Gallarate, G. and Piolanti, G. (1958). La barbabietola da zucchero. Edizioni Agricole, Bologna, 636p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongiovanni, G.C. and Lanzoni, L. (1964). La rizomania della bietola. Progresso Agricolo,2: 209, 220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canova, A. (1966). Ricerche virologiche nella rizomania della bietola. Rivista di Patologia Vegetale,4: 2, 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons, G.H. (1975). Interspecific hybrids betweenBeta vulgaris L. and the wild species ofBeta. Proc. ASSBT.:17–18, 281–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons, G.H., Owen, F.V. and Steward, D. (1955). Improvemet of the sugar beet in United States. Advances in Agronomy,7: 89–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Biaggi, M. (1987). Methodes de selection: un cas concret. Proc. IIRB,50: 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doney, D.L., Whitney, E.D., Terry, J., Frese, L. and Fitzgerad, P. (1990). The distribution and dispersal ofBeta vulgaris L. ssp. Maritime germplasm in England, Wales and Ireland. J. of Sugar Beet Research,27: 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentili, P. and Poggi, G. (1986). Ritmo, esperienze italiane contro rizomania e cercospora. Maribo Italia, Pubblicazione Tecnica,25: 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijbroek, W., Roelands, A.J., De Jong, J.H., Van Hulst, C.G., Schoone, A.H.L. and Munning, R.G. (1988). Sugar beet homozygous for resistance to beet cyst nematode (Heterodera schactii Schm.), developed from monosomic additions ofBeta procumbens toBeta vulgaris. Euphitica,38: 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijbroek, W. (1977). Partial resistance of sugarbeet to beet cysts eelworm (Heterodera schactii Schm.). Ibid.,26: 257–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijner, J.A. (1951). De gevoeligheid van wilde bieten voor het bietecysteaaltje (Heterodera schactii). Meded, Inst. Rat. Suikerprod.,21: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjerdin, A., Sall, T., Nilsson, N.O., Bornman, C.H. and Hallden, C. (1994). Genetic variation among wild and cultivated beets of the SectionBeta as revealed by RFLP analysis. J. of Sugar Beet Research,31: 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtschulte, B. (2000).Cercospora beticola. Worldwide distribution and incidence. In:Cercospora beticola Sacc, biology, agronomic influence and control measures in sugar beet. IIRB, Bruxelles, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.T. and Wheatley, G.W. (1961). Studies on the backcross generations of interspecific hybrids betweenBeta vulgaris andBeta webbana. J. of ASSBT,11: 429–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, W., Brandenburg, W.A. and De Bock, T.S.M. (1999). Taxonomy and cultonomy of beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Botanical J. of the Linnean Society,130: 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, W. and De Bock, T.S.M. (1994). Pre-breeding for nematode resistance in beet. J. of Sugar Beet Research,31: 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, R.T. (1988). Selection for resistance to rhizomania in sugar beet. Proc. 5th Intern. Congress Plant Path., Kyoto, 455.

  • Lewellen, R.T. and Biancardi, E. (1990). Breeding and performance of rhizomania resistant sugar beet. Proc. IIRB,53: 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewellwen, R.T., Skoyen, I.O. and Erichsen, A.W. (1987). Breeding sugarbeet for resistance to rhizomania: evaluation of host-plant reactions and selection for and inheritance of resistance. Proc. IIRB,50: 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munerati, O., Mezzadroli, T. and Zapparoli, V. (1913). Osservazioni sullaBeta maritima L. nel triennio 1910–1912. Le Stazioni Sperimentali Agrarie Italiane,46(6): 347–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldemeyer, R.K. (1954). Viable interspecific hybrids between wild species of the SectionVulgares and species in the SectionPatellares in the genusBeta. Proc. ASSBT,8: 153–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldemeyer, R.K. (1964).Beta macrorhiza. J. of ASSBT,12: 637–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldemeyer, R.K. and Brewbaker, H.E. (1956). Interspecific hybrids in the genusBeta. J. of ASSBT,9: 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky, H. (1973). Meiosis in hybrids betweenBeta vulgaris L. and transmission of sugar beet nematode resistance. Genetics,74: 241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky, H. (1975). Hybridization betweenBeta vulgaris andB. procumbens and transmission of nematode (Heterodera schactii) resistance to sugar beet. Can. J. Genet. Cytol.,17: 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky, H. and Price, C. (1965). Resistance to the sugar beet nematodeHeterodera schactii in F1 tetraploid hybrids between Beta vulgaris andBeta patellaris. J. of ASSBT,13: 370–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäufele, W.R. and Wevers, J.D.A. (1996). Possible contribution of tolerant and partially resistant sugarbeet varieties to the control of the foliar diseaseCercospora beticola. Proc. IIRB,59: 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, O.E., De Bock, T.S.M., Klein-Lankhorst, R.M. and Lange, W. (1999). Inheritance of resistance to beet necrotic yellow vein virus inBeta vulgaris conferred by a second gene for resistance. Theor. Appl. Genetics,99: 740–746.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, F.W. (1935). Contribution à ľetude de la karyologie de ľhybride deBeta trygina avec la betterave sucrière. Publ. IRBAB,3: 399–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, F.W. (1936). Ein Beitrag zur Zytologie eines seltenen Rübenbastardes und einer seiner Rückkreuzungen. Zeitschr. Wirtsch. Gruppe Zuckerindustrie,86: 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, F.W. (1938). Ein Beitrag zur Artbastardierung von Zuckerrüben mitBeta trygina. Deutsch. Zuckerind.,63: 439–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shagai-Maroff, M.A., Soliman, K.A., Jorgensen, R.A. and Allard, R.W. (1984). Ribospmal DNA spacer-length polymorfism in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,81: 8014–8018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaracis, G.N. and Biancardi, E. (2000). Breeding for Cercospora resistance in sugar beet. In:Cercospora beticola Sacc, biology, agronomic influence and control measures in sugar beet. IIRB, Bruxelles, 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehlik, V. (1947). Essais de croisment de betterave sucrière avecBeta trygina. IRBAB Publ. Tech.15: 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbrich, E. (1934).Chenopodiacee. In: Engler A., Harms H., Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilie. Verlag Wilhelm Hengelmann, Liepzig, Band 16c: 379–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Frijters, A., Pot, J., Poleman, J., Kuiper, M. and Zabeau, M. (1995). AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl. Acid Res.,23: 4407–4414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, F. (1961). Eine neue cytologische Untersüchungen für Betarüben. Züchter,14: 474–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, F. (1963). Untersüchungen an Wildrüben in der Turkei — Cytologische Untersüchungen an Wildrüben im Gebiet von Eskisehir, Zeitschr. f. Pflanzensch.,49: 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, E.D. (1989). Identification, distribution and testing for resistance to rhizomania inBeta maritima. Plant disease,73: 287–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piergiorgio Stevanato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stevanato, P., Biaggi, M.D., Skaracis, G.N. et al. The sea beet (Beta vulgaris L. ssp.maritima) of the adriatic coast as source of resistance for sugar beet. Sugar Tech 3, 77–82 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03014567

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03014567

Keywords

Navigation