Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 46, Supplement 5, pp R57–R69 | Cite as

Death in the ICU —the Halifax experience

  • Richard I. Hall
  • Patrick J. Duncan
  • Graeme Rocker
Refresher Course Outline Track I


From the perspective of process, be careful what is said during procedures involving disciplinary actions and what is written afterwards. The Minutes of any such meetings should be scrutinized for accuracy and corrected as needed. It is always wise to consider how the documentation would appear if printed on the front page of a national newspaper or broadcast on the radio or television. In any criminal case, the likelihood of such documents being used as evidence and subsequently becoming public knowledge is real. Regarding end of life care in the ICU, there is a clear need for dialogue. Physicians would do well to educate themselves about end of life care and to become involved in efforts to increase public awareness of the issues. Given the variability of care demonstrated during the withdrawal of life support process, our admission of an increasingly elderly and sick patient population, and the lack of appropriate dialogue at Federal and Provincial levels concerning modification of the current statutes, the likelihood of further legal actions (both civil and criminal) against physicians is unfortunately very real. We believe it is time for professional organizations such as the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society (CAS) to become more involved in these issues both from an educational and political perspective.


Intensive Care Unit Nova Scotia Life Support Criminal Code Life Care 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Mortalité à l’USI-l’expérience d’Halifax


Dans l’optique de la démarche, soyez attentif à ce qui se dit pendant les procédures d’actions disciplinaires et à ce qui s’écrit sur le sujet par la suite. On devrait examiner soigneusement l’exactitude du procès-verbal de telles réunions et le faire corriger si nécessaire. Il est toujours bon de penser comment la documentation serait présentée à la une du journal national ou diffusée à la radio ou à la télévision. Dans tout procès criminel, il est vraisemblable que des documents utilisés en preuve soient ensuite rendus publics. À propos des soins aux mourants à l’USI, il y a un réel besoin de dialogue. Les médecins gagneraient à s’informer sur ce genre de soins et à s’engager à faire connaître le sujet au public.Étant donné la variabilité des soins qu’on a pu observer pendant la période où l’assistance des fonctions vitales a été suspendue, l’admission à l’hôpital d’une population de patients plus âgés et plus malades et le manque de dialogue approprié aux niveaux fédéral et provincial sur la modification des statuts actuels, la possibilité de futures actions en justice (autant civile que criminelle) est malheureusement très réelle. Nous croyons qu’il est temps qu’une organisation professionnelle comme la Société des anesthésiologistes canadiens (SAC) s’occupe davantage de cette question d’un point de vue formatif et politique.


  1. 1.
    Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1997; 155: 15–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prendergast TJ, Ciaessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1163–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gilligan T, Raffin TA. Withdrawing life support: extubation and prolonged terminal weans are inappropriate (Editorial). Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 352–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asch DA, Hansen-Flaschen J, Lanken PN. Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: conflicts between physicians’ practices and patients’ wishes. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1995; 151: 288–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christakis NA, Asch DA. Biases in how physicians choose to withdraw life support. Lancet 1993; 342: 642–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walter SD, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, et al. Confidence in life-support decisions in the intensive care unit: a survey of healthcare workers. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 44–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luce JM, Raffin TA. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients. Chest 1988; 94: 621–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, et al. Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. JAMA 1995; 273: 703–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Randolph AG, Zollo MB, Wigton RS, Yeh TS. Factors explaining variability among caregivers in the intent to restrict life-support interventions in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 435–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brody H, Campbell ML, Faber-Langendoen K, Ogle KS. Withdrawing intensive life-sustaning treatment —Recommendations for compassionate clinical care. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 652–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee. Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning forgoing life-sustaining treatments. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 320–6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rubenfeld GD, Crawford SW. Withdrawing life support from mechanically ventilated recipients of bone marrow transplants: a case for evidence-based guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 625–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cher DJ, Lenert LA. Method of medicare reimbursement and the rate of potentially ineffective care of critically ill patients. JAMA 1997; 278: 1001–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kollef MH. Private attending physician status and the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions in a medical intensive care unit population. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 968–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Faber-Langendoen K. A multi-institutional study of care given to patients dying in hospitals. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 2130–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keenan SP, Busche KD, Chen LM, McCarthy L, Inman KJ, Sibbald WJ. A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life support. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1324–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS, et al. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 309–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee DKP, Swinburne AJ, Fedullo AJ, Wahl GW. Withdrawing care: experience in a medical intensive care unit. JAMA 1994; 271: 1358–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilson WC, Smedira NG, Fink C, McDowell JA, Luce JM. Ordering and administration of sedatives and analgesics during the withholding and withdrawal of life support drom critically ill patients. JAMA 1992; 267: 949–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wood GG, Martin E. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unit. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42: 186–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Faber-Langendoen K, Bartels DM. Process of forgoing life-sustaining treatment in a university hospital: an empirical study. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 570–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keenan SP, Busche KD, Chen LM, et al. Withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit: a comparison of teaching and community hospitals. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 245–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Faber-Langendoen K. The clinical management of dying patients receiving mechanical ventilation —a survey of physician practice. Chest 1994; 106: 880–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ruark JE, Raffin TA, The Stanford University Medical Center Committee on Ethics. Initiating and withdrawing life support. Principles and practice in adult medicine. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 25–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 144: 726–31.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    American Thoracic Society. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 478–84.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    American College of Physicians. American College of Phyicians Ethics Manual. Part 2: The physician and society; research, life-sustaining treatment; other issues. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111: 327–35.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bone RC, Rackow EC, Weg JG, Members of the ACCP/SCCM Consensus Panel. Ethical and moral guidelines for the initiation, continuation, and withdrawal of intensive care. Chest 1990; 97: 949–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Task Force on Ethics of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Consensus report on the ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 1990; 18: 1435–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rocker GM, Hall RI, Murray D, Cummings I. Admission and end of life sedation and analgesia preferences in the ICU. Chest 1998; 114: 332S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hall RI, Rocker GM, Norris J. Care at the end of life Medication use during the final 12 hours in the ICU. Chest 1998; 114: S333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard I. Hall
    • 1
    • 3
  • Patrick J. Duncan
    • 2
  • Graeme Rocker
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Dalhousie UniversityCanada
  2. 2.Halifax
  3. 3.Medical/Surgical Intensive Care UnitQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreHalifax

Personalised recommendations