Skip to main content
Log in

La sinistrose: un concept à réviser

  • Published:
Douleur et Analgésie

Résumé

La sinistrose, ou névrose de compensation, est un concept pas toujours très clair, malgré qu'il ait été décrit depuis de nombreuses années. Dans cet article, l'auteur cherche à le définir, à le mettre en relation avec la notion d'invalidité. Une revue de la littérature est faite, ce qui permet la description d'un certain nombre de variables prémorbides et aussi une définition plus claire du syndrome. Partant de là, un dépistage précoce pourrait être possible, ce qui est en effet indispensable, car il apparaît bien, une fois que l'accident a eu lieu, que tout se joue très vite. Les interventions médicales semblent d'ailleurs plutôt jouer un rôle de renforcement de la sinistrose. Un certain nombre d'idées personnelles sont avancées, en tenant compte notamment de la réalité en Suisse, où la sinistrose n'a pas valeur de maladie auprès des assurances sociales.

Summary

Compensation neurosis is not a clearly defined concept, despite the fact that it was recognised and described many years ago. In this paper, the author tries to define it and to relate it to the notion of disability. A review of the literature is made, so it is possible to specify a certain number of premorbid factors and to define more clearly the concept of compensation neurosis. Thus, an early screening should be possible, which is very important, for it seems that once the accident has happened, the process of the neurosis follows very quickly. The medical interventions probably produce a strengthening of the neurosis. Personal ideas are proposed, taking into account the law in Switzerland, where compensation neurosis is not seen as an illness by the social insurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliographie

  1. Alaranta H., Hurme M. andMiettinen M.L.: Handicap 1 year following surgery for lumbar disc herniation: special reference to social and vocational factors.Int. Rehabil. Med. 8, 39–43, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Balla J.I. andMoraitis S.: Knights in armour. A follow-up study of injuries after legal settlement.Med. J. Austr. 2, 355–361, 1970.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Behan R.C. andHirschfeld A.H.: The accident process. II. Toward more rational treatment of industrial injuries.JAMA 186, 300–306, 1963.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Behan R.C. andHirschfeld A.H.: Disability without disease or accident.Arch. Environ. Health 12, 655–659, 1966.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brena S.F. andChapman S.L.: Pain and litigation.In: Textbook of pain. P. Well, R. Melzack ed., Churchill Livingstone, p. 832–839, 1984.

  6. Brissaud E.: La sinistrose.Conc. Med. 30, 114–117, 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brodsky C.M.: Social psychiatric consequences of job incompetence.Compreh. Psychiatry 12, 526–536, 1971.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cole E.S.: Psychiatric aspects of compensable injury.Med. J. Austr. 1, 93–100, 1970.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Delaloye R.: Contribution à l'étude des surcharges psychogènes chez les assurés. Publications Universitaires Européennes, 1973.

  10. DSM-III. Manuel diagnostique et statistique des troubles mentaux. Masson, 1986.

  11. Dvorak J., Valach L. undSchmid S.: Verletzungen der Halswirbelsäule in der Schweiz.Orthopäde 16, 2–12, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Enterline P.E.: Social causes of sick absence.Arch. Environ. Health 12, 466–473, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Foerster K.: Die Sogenannte «Unfallneurose»—ein umstrittener Begriff?Akt. Traumatol. 17, 219–223, 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gore D.R. andSepic S.B.: Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or proruted discs: a review of one hundred forty-six patients.Spine 9, 667–671, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hammonds W., Brena S.F. andUnikel I.P.: Compensation for work-related injuries and rehabilitation of patients with chronic pain.South. Med. J. 71, 664–666, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirschfeld A.H. andBehan R.C.: The accident process. I. Etiological considerations of industrial injuries.JAMA 186, 193–199, 1963.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirschfeld A.H. andBehan R.C.: The accident process. III. Disability: acceptable and unacceptable.JAMA 197, 85–89, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kind H.: Neurose und Unfallversicherung.Schweizer Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. 139, 31–41, 1988.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Krusen E.M. andFord D.E.: Compensation factor in low, back injuries.JAMA 166, 1128–1133, 1958.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Leavitt F., Garron D.C., McNeill T.W. andWhisler W.W.: Organic status, psychological disturbance, and pain report characteristics in low-back-pain patients on compensation.Spine 7, 398–402, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ludwig A.M.: The disabled Society?Am. J. Psychother. 35, 5–15, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Melzack R., Katz J. andJeans M.E.: The role of compensation in chronic pain: analysis using a new method of scoring the McGill Pain Questionnaire.Pain 23, 101–112, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mendelson G.: Compensation, pain complaints, and psychological disturbance.Pain 20, 169–177, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mendelson G.: Chronic pain and compensation: a review.J. Pain Sympt. Manag. 1, 135–144, 1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller H.: Accident neurosis. Lecture II.Br Méd. J. 1, 992–998, 1961.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moeri R.: Lombalgies chroniques et réinsertion professionnelle: facteurs pronostiqués. Conférence lors de la 10e journée des médecins des COMAI, St-Gall, 1988.

  27. Nelson D.: A practical approach to workers' compensation in chronic pain: analysis using a new method of scoring the McGill Pain Questionnaire.Pain 23, 101–112, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Office Fédéral des assurances sociales: Statistiques de l'invalidité, 1987.

  29. Peck C.J., Fordyce W.E. andBlack R.G.: The effect of the pendency of claims for compensation upon behavior indicative of pain.Washington Law Review 53, 251–278, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tarsh M.J. andRoyston C.: A follow-up study of accident neurosis.Br. J. Psychiat. 146, 18–25, 1985.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Teusch L.: Ein katamnestischer Nachtrag zur Rentenneurose-studie.Fortschr. Neurol. Psychiat. 52, 113–115, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tilmann W.A. andHobbs L.E.: The accident prone automobile driver.Am. J. Psychiatry 106, 321, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Verbrugge L.M.: Females and illness: recent trends in sex differences in the United States.J. Health Soc. Behav. 17, 387–403, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Weighill V.E.: Compensation neurosis: a review of the literature.J. Psychosom. Res. 27, 97–104, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Weinstein M.R.: The illness process. Psychological hazards of disability programs.JAMA 204, 209–213, 1968.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Weinstein M.R.: The disability process: contribution of service agencies to client disability.Compr. Psychiatry 10, 398–405, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Weinstein M.R.: The concept of the disability process.Psychosomatics 19, 94–97, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Rosatti, P. La sinistrose: un concept à réviser. Doul. et Analg. 2, 61–67 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013058

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013058

Key words

Navigation