Résumé
La sinistrose, ou névrose de compensation, est un concept pas toujours très clair, malgré qu'il ait été décrit depuis de nombreuses années. Dans cet article, l'auteur cherche à le définir, à le mettre en relation avec la notion d'invalidité. Une revue de la littérature est faite, ce qui permet la description d'un certain nombre de variables prémorbides et aussi une définition plus claire du syndrome. Partant de là, un dépistage précoce pourrait être possible, ce qui est en effet indispensable, car il apparaît bien, une fois que l'accident a eu lieu, que tout se joue très vite. Les interventions médicales semblent d'ailleurs plutôt jouer un rôle de renforcement de la sinistrose. Un certain nombre d'idées personnelles sont avancées, en tenant compte notamment de la réalité en Suisse, où la sinistrose n'a pas valeur de maladie auprès des assurances sociales.
Summary
Compensation neurosis is not a clearly defined concept, despite the fact that it was recognised and described many years ago. In this paper, the author tries to define it and to relate it to the notion of disability. A review of the literature is made, so it is possible to specify a certain number of premorbid factors and to define more clearly the concept of compensation neurosis. Thus, an early screening should be possible, which is very important, for it seems that once the accident has happened, the process of the neurosis follows very quickly. The medical interventions probably produce a strengthening of the neurosis. Personal ideas are proposed, taking into account the law in Switzerland, where compensation neurosis is not seen as an illness by the social insurance.
Bibliographie
Alaranta H., Hurme M. andMiettinen M.L.: Handicap 1 year following surgery for lumbar disc herniation: special reference to social and vocational factors.Int. Rehabil. Med. 8, 39–43, 1986.
Balla J.I. andMoraitis S.: Knights in armour. A follow-up study of injuries after legal settlement.Med. J. Austr. 2, 355–361, 1970.
Behan R.C. andHirschfeld A.H.: The accident process. II. Toward more rational treatment of industrial injuries.JAMA 186, 300–306, 1963.
Behan R.C. andHirschfeld A.H.: Disability without disease or accident.Arch. Environ. Health 12, 655–659, 1966.
Brena S.F. andChapman S.L.: Pain and litigation.In: Textbook of pain. P. Well, R. Melzack ed., Churchill Livingstone, p. 832–839, 1984.
Brissaud E.: La sinistrose.Conc. Med. 30, 114–117, 1908.
Brodsky C.M.: Social psychiatric consequences of job incompetence.Compreh. Psychiatry 12, 526–536, 1971.
Cole E.S.: Psychiatric aspects of compensable injury.Med. J. Austr. 1, 93–100, 1970.
Delaloye R.: Contribution à l'étude des surcharges psychogènes chez les assurés. Publications Universitaires Européennes, 1973.
DSM-III. Manuel diagnostique et statistique des troubles mentaux. Masson, 1986.
Dvorak J., Valach L. undSchmid S.: Verletzungen der Halswirbelsäule in der Schweiz.Orthopäde 16, 2–12, 1987.
Enterline P.E.: Social causes of sick absence.Arch. Environ. Health 12, 466–473, 1966.
Foerster K.: Die Sogenannte «Unfallneurose»—ein umstrittener Begriff?Akt. Traumatol. 17, 219–223, 1987.
Gore D.R. andSepic S.B.: Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or proruted discs: a review of one hundred forty-six patients.Spine 9, 667–671, 1984.
Hammonds W., Brena S.F. andUnikel I.P.: Compensation for work-related injuries and rehabilitation of patients with chronic pain.South. Med. J. 71, 664–666, 1978.
Hirschfeld A.H. andBehan R.C.: The accident process. I. Etiological considerations of industrial injuries.JAMA 186, 193–199, 1963.
Hirschfeld A.H. andBehan R.C.: The accident process. III. Disability: acceptable and unacceptable.JAMA 197, 85–89, 1967.
Kind H.: Neurose und Unfallversicherung.Schweizer Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. 139, 31–41, 1988.
Krusen E.M. andFord D.E.: Compensation factor in low, back injuries.JAMA 166, 1128–1133, 1958.
Leavitt F., Garron D.C., McNeill T.W. andWhisler W.W.: Organic status, psychological disturbance, and pain report characteristics in low-back-pain patients on compensation.Spine 7, 398–402, 1982.
Ludwig A.M.: The disabled Society?Am. J. Psychother. 35, 5–15, 1981.
Melzack R., Katz J. andJeans M.E.: The role of compensation in chronic pain: analysis using a new method of scoring the McGill Pain Questionnaire.Pain 23, 101–112, 1985.
Mendelson G.: Compensation, pain complaints, and psychological disturbance.Pain 20, 169–177, 1984.
Mendelson G.: Chronic pain and compensation: a review.J. Pain Sympt. Manag. 1, 135–144, 1986.
Miller H.: Accident neurosis. Lecture II.Br Méd. J. 1, 992–998, 1961.
Moeri R.: Lombalgies chroniques et réinsertion professionnelle: facteurs pronostiqués. Conférence lors de la 10e journée des médecins des COMAI, St-Gall, 1988.
Nelson D.: A practical approach to workers' compensation in chronic pain: analysis using a new method of scoring the McGill Pain Questionnaire.Pain 23, 101–112, 1985.
Office Fédéral des assurances sociales: Statistiques de l'invalidité, 1987.
Peck C.J., Fordyce W.E. andBlack R.G.: The effect of the pendency of claims for compensation upon behavior indicative of pain.Washington Law Review 53, 251–278, 1978.
Tarsh M.J. andRoyston C.: A follow-up study of accident neurosis.Br. J. Psychiat. 146, 18–25, 1985.
Teusch L.: Ein katamnestischer Nachtrag zur Rentenneurose-studie.Fortschr. Neurol. Psychiat. 52, 113–115, 1984.
Tilmann W.A. andHobbs L.E.: The accident prone automobile driver.Am. J. Psychiatry 106, 321, 1949.
Verbrugge L.M.: Females and illness: recent trends in sex differences in the United States.J. Health Soc. Behav. 17, 387–403, 1976.
Weighill V.E.: Compensation neurosis: a review of the literature.J. Psychosom. Res. 27, 97–104, 1983.
Weinstein M.R.: The illness process. Psychological hazards of disability programs.JAMA 204, 209–213, 1968.
Weinstein M.R.: The disability process: contribution of service agencies to client disability.Compr. Psychiatry 10, 398–405, 1969.
Weinstein M.R.: The concept of the disability process.Psychosomatics 19, 94–97, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Rosatti, P. La sinistrose: un concept à réviser. Doul. et Analg. 2, 61–67 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013058
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013058