Skip to main content
Log in

Medical-legal concerns among Canadian anaesthetists

  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a national survey of anaesthetists which was undertaken to determine the effect of liability concerns on the practice of anaesthesia. Four hundred seventy-six anaesthetists from four regions (East, Quebec, Ontario and the West) (overall usable response rate of 73.3 per cent) responded to a series of questions on sources of liability information, changes in practice patterns over the past five years, changes in style of practice and attitudes towards the physician— patient relationship and to medical-legal concerns. The major findings were that the respondents rated liability concerns as the first or second most important reason for making major changes in their practice. Some of the changes in practice were related to increased use of monitoring, more time spent with patients discussing the risks of anaesthesia and increased documentation. On the negative side, respondents had decreased the administration of obstetrical and paediatric anaesthesia and were ordering more laboratory tests and x-rays. The majority of respondents agreed that the physician— patient relationship has suffered in recent years and physicians who had been in practice for longer periods of time were more likely to be dissatisfied and to consider leaving the field of medicine. However, the survey could not show a cause-and-effect relationship between claimed practice changes and fear of litigation.

Résumé

Récemment, 476 anesthésistes des quatre grandes régions du pays ont répondu à une enquéte portant sur l’influence des questions de responsabilité professionnelle sur la pratique de l’anesthésie (taux de réponse de 73,3 pour cent). On s’est intéressé à leurs sources d’informations concernant la respon-sabilité, aux changements survenus dans leur mode de pratique et dans leurs relations avec les patients ces derniers cinq ans, de même qu’à leur niveau de préoccupation d’ordre médicolégal. Il ressort d’abord que ces préoccupations sont trés, sinon le plus souvent citées pour justifier des changements de pratique majeurs. On parle alors d’une plus grande utilisation de monitorage, de plus de temps passé a discuter avec les patients des risques liées a l’anesthésie et de dossiers plus soignés. La plupart des répondants avaient vu une détérioration des relations entre médecins et patients et les praticiens d’expérience étaient plus souvent insatisfaits et parlaient plus d’abandonner la médecine. Cependant nous n’avons pu trouver de relation causale entre les changements allégues dans le mode de pratique et les craintes de poursuite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eichhorn J. Prevention on intraoperative anesthesia accidents and related severe injury through safety monitoring. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 572–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheney FW, Posner K, Caplan RA, Ward RJ. Standards of care and anesthesia liability. JAMA 1989; 261: 1599–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Utting JE, Gray TC, Shelley FC. Human misadventure in anesthesia. Can Anaesth Soc J 1979; 26: 472–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, M.M., Wade, J. & Woodward, C. Medical-legal concerns among Canadian anaesthetists. Can J Anesth 37, 102–111 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03007490

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03007490

Keywords

Navigation