Advertisement

Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 195–202 | Cite as

Double-blind evaluation of buprenorphine hydrochloride for post-operative pain

  • Allen B. Dobkin
  • Barbara Esposito
  • Carole Philbin
Article

Summary and Conclusions

In a double-blind, random assignment study of four groups of 40 patients, relief of severe pain with buprenorphine hydrochloride 0.2 mg or 0.4 mg was evaluated and compared with morphine sulphate 5 or 10 mg. Evaluations included pain intensity, pain relief, sedation and other effects for up to 12 hours after drug administration, following recovery of wakefulness from anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery. Analyses of five parameters showed that the four groups were statistically comparable and that buprenorphine hydrochloride is at least 50 times more potent than morphine sulphate and has a substantially longer duration of analgesic action. Further clinical evaluation is, therefore, recommended.

Keywords

Morphine Pain Intensity Buprenorphine CANADIAN Anaesthetist Pain Intensity Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Résumé

Le chlorure de buprenorphine à des doses de 0.2 et de 0.4 mg a été comparée à la morphine à des doses de 5 et de 10 mg, ceci après éveil de ľanesthésie et suivant une chirurgie abdominale majeure.

Ľintensité de la douleur, son soulagement et la sédation produite, ainsi que les autres effets observés, ceci dans les 12 heures suivant ľadministration, ont été évalués.

Cette étude à double insu, portant sur une population volontaire de 160 malades, a permis de former quatre groupes au hasard, pour fins de comparaison des agents et des doses administrées.

Ľanalyse de nos résultats démontre que (1) nos quatre groupes étaient statis-tiquement comparables, (2) que le chlorure de buprenorphine est au moins 50 fois plus puissant que la morphine et (3) que son action est substantiellement plus longue.

On recommande la poursuite de son évaluation clinique.

References

  1. 1.
    Dobkin, A.B. Buprenorphine hydrochloride: determination of analgesic potency. Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J.24: 186–194 (l977).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lewis, J.W., Mayor, P.A., &Haddleser, D.I. Novel analgesics and molecular rearrangements in the morphine-thebaine group 30. J. Med. Chem.16: 12 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reckitt &Colman: Unpublished clinical reports (1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beecher, H.K. Measurement of subjective responses: Quantitative effects of drugs. New York, Oxford University Press (1959).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lasagna, L. The clinical measurement of pain. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.86: 28 (1960).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lasagna, L. The clinical evaluation of morphine and its substitutes as analgesics. Pharmacol. Rev.16: 47 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foldes, F.F., Swerdlow, M., &Siker, E.S. Assessment of analgesia in narcotics and narcotic antagonists. Springfield, Illinois. C.C. Thomas, pp. 113–123 (1964).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barr, A.J. &Goodnight, J.H. A user’s guide to the statistical analysis system. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C. 27607 (1972).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Neill, R. &Wetherill, G.B. The present state of multiple comparison analysis. J. Roy Statistics Soc.33: 218 (1971).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simpson, B.R.J. &Parkhouse, J. The problem of post-operative pain. Brit. J. Anaesth.33: 336 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parkhouse, J., Lambrechts, W., &Simpson, B.R.J. The incidence of post-operative pain. Brit. J. Anaesth.33: 345 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Swerdlow, M. The relief of pain after abdominal surgery. Anesth. & Analg.42: 588 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Melzack, R. The puzzle of pain. Basic Books Inc., New York, N.Y. (1974).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melzack, R. &Torgerson, W.S. On the language of pain. Anesthesiology34: 50 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clark, W.C. Pain sensitivity and the report of pain. Anesthesiology40: 272 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allen B. Dobkin
    • 1
  • Barbara Esposito
    • 1
  • Carole Philbin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyState University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, State University HospitalNew YorkU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations