Advertisement

A comparative assessment of alfathesin for use in outpatient anaesthesia

  • G. L. Dunn
  • P. J. Houlton
  • D. H. Morison
  • R. Rajagopalan
Article

Summary

Alfathesin and thiopentone were compared in a double blind study where each drug was given by intravenous infusion supplemented with fentanyl and nitrous oxide, in 54 healthy female patients under-going therapeutic abortion. The two drugs were similar in terms of changes in cardiorespiratory variables, side effects, clinical efficacy, and patient acceptability. Alfathesin produced a significantly more rapid recovery from anaesthesia, without the high incidence of dreams found with thiopentone in this study. Alfathesin would seem to be the preferable drug for use in outpatients undergoing minor surgical operations.

Keywords

Nitrous Oxide Thiopentone Potency Ratio Double Insu Anaesthetic Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

RéSUMé

Dans le cadre ďune étude à double insu, 54 patients chez qui ľon procédait à un avortement thérapeutique ont reçu une infusion ďalfathesin, ou une infusion de thiopental supplémentée de protoxyde ďazote et de fentanyl.

Les modifications cardiorespiratoires, les effets secondaires, ainsi que ľefficacité clinique des deux agents ont été jugés similaires.

Ľéveil des patientes ayant reçu une perfusion ďalfathesin a cependant été plus rapide et ce de façon significative. Cet agent nous apparaît donc préférable dans les cas de chirurgie ambulatoire.

References

  1. 1.
    Swerdlow, M. Althesin — a new intravenous anaesthetic. Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J.20: 186 (1973).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Savege, T.M., Foley, E.I., Coultas, R.J., Walton, B., Strunin, L., Simpson, B.R., &Scott, D.F. CT 1341: some effects in man. Cardiorespiratory, electroencephalographic and biochemical changes. Anaesthesia26: 402 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tammisto, T., Takki, S., Tigerstedt, I., &Kauste, A. A comparison of althesin and thiopentone in induction of anaesthesia. Brit. J. Anaesth.45: 100 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broadley, J.N. &Taylor, P.A. An assessment of althesin for the induction of anaesthesia in cardiac surgical patients — a comparison with thiopentone. Brit. J. Anaesth.46: 687 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DuCailar, J. The effects in man of infusions of Althesin with particular regard to the cardiovascular system. Postgrad. Med. J. Suppl. (2)48: 66 (1972).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clarke, R.S.J., Dundee, J.W., &Carson, I.W. Some aspects of the clinical pharmacology of Althesin. Postgrad. Med. J. Suppl. (2)48: 62 (1972).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller, D.C., Bradford, E.M.W., &Campbell, D. Haemodynamic effects of Althesin in poor risk patients. Postgrad. Med. J. Suppl. (2)48: 133 (1972).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Obdrzalek, J. Althesin and thiopentone: a clinical comparison. Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J.22: 601 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, B. &Pearce, D.R. An introduction to Althesin (CT 1341). Postgrad. Med. J. Suppl. (2)48: 13 (1972).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strunin, L., Strunin, J.M., Knights, K.M., &Ward, M.E. Metabolism of14C-labelled alphaxolone in man. Brit. J. Anaesth.49: 609 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. L. Dunn
    • 1
  • P. J. Houlton
    • 1
  • D. H. Morison
    • 1
  • R. Rajagopalan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnaesthesiaMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations