Advertisement

Acta Endoscopica

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 277–284 | Cite as

Echoendoscopic thérapeutique: nouveautés d’hier, pratiques actuelles

  • P. H. Deprez
Article

Therapeutic EUS: novelties yesterday, current practice today

Résumé

L’échoendoscopic (EED) est une des techniques d’endoscopic digestive évoluant le plus rapidement sur le plan technologique et au niveau des indications d’examen. Elle permet l’exploration de nouvelles voies d’endothérapie par sa combinaison unique de techniques endoscopiques et d’imagerie ultrasonore. Les indications thérapeutiques de l’EED peuvent être divisées en 2 groupes: l’imagerie par EED pour permettre la réalisation de gestes d’endothérapie conventionnelle et l’EED directement thérapeutique par exemple dans les procédés de drainage de collections ou d’injections à l’aiguille fine. La revue ci-dessous décrit les applications actuelles de l’EED thérapeutique, les indications nouvelles et les développements futurs de cette technologie.

Summary

Since its development in the early 1980s, endosonography (EUS) is one of the most rapidly advancing fields in gastrointestinal endoscopy. It indeed provides new areas of endotherapy by its outstanding combination of endoscopic techniques and ultrasound imaging. Therapeutic EUS indications can be divided into two main areas: EUS imaging as an aid to standard interventional endoscopic procedures and direct interventions including drainage procedures and fineneedle injection therapies. The following review describes the current applications of therapeutic EUS, novel indications and future potential developments of this technology.

Mots-clés

échoendoscopic endothérapie 

Key-words

endosonography endotherapy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. 1.
    Deprez P. Comparison of EUS with the new medical imaging modalities. Acta Endosc 1999; 29: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mallery S, Van Dam J. Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography: current status and future direction. J Clin Gastroenterol 1999; 29: 297–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhutani M. Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography: state of the art at the new millenium. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 62–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Waxman I, Dye C. Interventional endosonography. Cancer J 2002; 8: S113–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yong A and Roberts S. Interventional endoscopic ultrasound. Clin Radiol 2003; 58: 32–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hawes R. New approaches in interventional EUS. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2002; 56: S62-S65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ribeiro A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema MJ. Doppler EUS-guided treatment of gastric Dieulafoy’s lesion. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 807–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fockens P, Meenan J, Van Dullemen HM, Bolwerk CJ, Tytgat GN. Dieulafoy’s disease: endosonographic detection and endosonography-guided treatment. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 437–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dohmoto M, Akiyama K, Lioka Y. Endoscopic and endosonographic management of pancreatic pseudocyst: a long-term follow-up. Rev Gastroenterol Peru 2003; 23: 269–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Battaglia G, Bocus P, Morbin T, Ancona E. Endoscopic Doppler US-guided injection therapy for gastric varices: case report. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 608–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Breslin N, Wallace MB. Diagnosis and fine needle aspiration of pancreatic pseudocysts: the role of endoscopie ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002; 12: 781–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller L, Banson FL, Bazir K, Korimilli A, Liu JB, Dewan R,et al. Risk of esophageal variceal bleeding based on endoscopic ultrasound evaluation of the sum of esophageal variceal crosssectional surface area. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 454–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pontes JM, Leitao MC, Portela F, Nunes A, Freitas D. Endosonographic Doppler-guided manometry of esophageal varices: experimental validation and clinical feasibility. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 966–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sung JJ, Lee YT, Leong RW. EUS in portal hypertension. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: S35–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Irisawa A, Shibukawa G, Obara K, Saito A, Takagi T, Shishido H,et al. Collateral vessels around the esophageal wall in patients with portal hypertension: comparison of EUS imaging and microscopic findings at autopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 249–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee YT, Chan FK, Ching JY, Lai CW, Leung VK, Chung SC, Sung JJ. Diagnosis of gastroesophageal varices and portal collateral venous abnormalities by endosonography in cirrhotic patients. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 391–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li R, Wen Y, Liu M, Li S. [Use of color Doppler esophageal ultrasonography for assessing hemodynamics of the lower esophageal veins before and after endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation]. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 1999; 24: 50–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ziegler K, Gregor M, Zeitz M, Zimmer T, Habermann F, Riecken EO. Evaluation of endosonography in sclerotherapy of esophageal varices. Endoscopy 1991; 23: 247–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ahmad NA, Kochman ML, Ginsberg GG. Endoscopis ultrasound and endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal cancers and villous adenomas. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2002; 16: 897–906.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kinney T, Waxman I. Treatment of benign esophageal tumors by endoscopic techniques. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 15: 27–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giovannini M, Bernardini D, Moutardier V, Monges G, Houvenaeghel G, Scitz JF, Derlpero JR. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): results and prognostic factors in 21 patients. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 698–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ohashi S, Segawa K, Okamura S, Mitake M, Urano H, Shimodaira M,et al. The utility of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopy in the endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer. Gut 1999; 45: 599–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kida M, Tanabe S, Watanabe M, Kokutou M, Kondou I, Yamada Y,et al. Staging of gastric cancer with endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 1998; 30 Suppl 1: A64–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Akahoshi K, Chijiiway, Hamada S, Sasaki I, Maruoka A, Kabemura T, Nawata H. Endoscopic ultrasonography: a promising method for assessing the prospects of endoscopic mucosal resection in early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 614–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laurent S, Piessevaux H, Sempoux C, Geubel A, Deprez P. Endoscopic resection and ablation of benign and malignant tumours of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: W1466.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fockens P, Johnson TG, Van Dullemen HM, Huibregtse K, Tytgat GN. Endosonographic imaging of pancreatic pseudocysts before endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46: 412–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grimm H, Binmoeller K, Soehendra N. Endosonographyguided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 170–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Scifert H, Dietrich C, Schmitt T, Caspary W, Wehrmann T. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided one-step transmural drainage of cystic abdominal lesions with a large-channel echo endoscope. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 255–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wiersema M, Baron T, Chari S. Endosonography-guided pseudocyst drainage with a new large-channel linear scanning echoendoscope. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2001; 53: 811–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Giovannini M, Bernardini D, Scitz JF. Cystogastrotomy entirely performed under endosonography guidance for pancreatic pseudocyst: results in six patients. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1998; 48: 200–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vilmann P, Hancke S, Pless T, Schell-Hincke J, Henriksen F. One-step endosonography-guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst: a new technique of stent delivery through the echo endoscope. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 730–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scifert H, Faust D, Schmitt T, Dietrich C, Caspary W, Wehrmann T. Transmural drainage of cystic peripancreatic lesions with a new large-channel echo endoscope. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 1022–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Giovannini M, Pesenti C, Rolland A, Moutardier V, Delpero J. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts or pancreatic abscesses using a therapeutic echo endoscope. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 473–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sanchez Cortes E, Maalak A, Le Moine O, Baize M, Delhaye M, Matos C, Deviere J. Endoscopic cystenterostomy of nonbulging pancreatic fluid collections. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 380–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gillain C, Piessevaux H, Descamps Ch, Gigot JF, Horsmans Y, Deprez PH. Endosonographic (EUS) cystogastrostomy or cystenterostomy in acute and chronic pancreatitis Gastrointestinal Endosc 2003; 57 [5]: W1219.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baron T. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections and pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003; 13: 743–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hoffman B. EUS-guided celiac plexus block/neurolysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: S26-S28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wiersema MJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 656–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S, Ciaccia D, Ikenberrys, Lehman G. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis: a prospective single center experience. Am J Gastroenterology 2001: 96: 409–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goldberg S, Mallery S, Gazelle G, Brugge W. EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation in the pancreas: results in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 392–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bedford R, Hecht J, Lahoti S, Abbruzzese L, So L, Kim D. Tolerability and efficacy of direct injection of pancreatic adenocarcinomas with ONYX-015 under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: AB97.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chang K, Nguyen P, Thompson J, Kurosaki T, Casey L, Leung E, Granger G. Phase I clinical trial of allogeneic mixed lymphocyte culture (cytoimplant) delivered by endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle injection in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 88: 1325–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Krinsky M, Binmoeller K. EUS-guided investigational therapy for pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: S35-S38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thompson C, Bounds B, Brugge W. EUS-guided ethanol lavage of pancreatic cystadenomas: a pilot study to assess safety and effect. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: AB242.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wiersema M, Sandusky D, Carr R, Wiersema L, Erdel W, Frederick P. Endosonography-guided cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43: 102–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Giovannini M, Moutardier V, Pesenti C, Bories E, Lelong B, Delpero J. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: a new technique for biliary drainage. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 898–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sahai A, Hoffman B, Hawes R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy to palliate obstructive jaundice: preliminary results in pigs [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47: AB37.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gress F, Ikenberry S, Sherman S, Lehman G. Endoscopic ultrasound-directed pancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 736–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Harada N, Kouzu T, Arima M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatography: a case report. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 612–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kahaleh M, Yoshida C, Yeaton P. EUS antegrade pancreatography with gastropancreatic duct stent placement: Review of two cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 919–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Francois E, Kahaleh M, Giovannini M, Matos C, Deviere J. EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2002; 56: 128–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bataille L, Deprez PH. A new application for therapeutic EUS: Main pancreatic duct drainage with a «pancreatic rendezvous technique». Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 740–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ginsberg G, Barthel L, Cope C. Peroral creation of durable gastroenteric anastomosis with magnetic compression and stenting [abstract], Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: AB97.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Takada H, Kuwayama H, Takehashi N, Katayama Y. Noninvasive gastrointestinal anastomosis with magnet rings [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 31: AB104.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Swain P, Mukherjee D, Moose A, Fritscher-Ravens A. A single lumen access anastomosis device for flexible endoscopy [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: AB96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. H. Deprez
    • 1
  1. 1.Cliniques Universitaires Saint-LucUniversité Catholique de LouvainBruxellesBelgique

Personalised recommendations