Autonomic concomitants of discriminative avoidance and punishment training in the monkey

  • M. S. Raich
  • H. D. Kimmel


TwoCebus albifrons monkeys were trained to press a back-lighted panel to postpone a brief electric shock to the tail using a Sidman avoidance schedule (SS = 40 sec, RS = 40 sec). After 25 training sessions, a discriminative schedule was introduced, with the Sidman avoidance continuing in the presence of one discriminative stimulus and punishment introduced in the presence of the other. The discriminative stimuli were colors on the panel. Discriminative training also involved 25 sessions, each with a random sequence of 6 avoidance and 6 punishment segments, with 30 sec intervals between the segments. Plantar skin conductance and heart rate were recorded along with the panel-pressing behavior. The two monkeys adjusted to the discriminative schedule quite differently from one another. One animal responded at a high level and avoided very well (during avoidance) but was punished frequently (during punishment). The other animal responded less frequently and received many shocks during avoidance but almost none during punishment. The animal that showed less ability to inhibit responding (and received about four times as many shocks overall) appeared to have discriminated better temporally in spacing its responses during avoidance training. The monkey whose panel-pressing behavior resulted in more shocks also tended to show a higher tonic level of autonomic arousal. However, within-animal differences in shock frequency (between avoidance and punishment) were not similarly related to autonomie arousal. The animal that received fewer shocks overall (but more during avoidance) showed greater arousal during punishment. The animal that received more shocks overall (but fewer during avoidance) showed no arousal differences between avoidance and punishment.


Discrimination Training Skin Conductance Response Skin Conductance Level Avoidance Training Autonomic Arousal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anger, D.: The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times. J. Exper. Psychol.52, 145–161, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brady, J. V., Findley, J. D. and Harris, A.: Psychophysiology of emotion.In Kimmel, H. D. (ed.);Experimental Psychopathology. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Kimmel, H. D., Brennan, A. F., McLeod, D.,et al.: Instrumental electrodermal conditioning in the monkey (Cebus albifrons): Acquisition and long-term retention. Anim. Learning Behav. in press.Google Scholar
  4. Mackintosh, N. J.:The Psychology of Animal Learning. New York, Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. Sidman, M.: Avoidance behavior.In Honig, W. K. (ed.):Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. Venables, P. H. and Christie, M. J.: Mechanisms, instrumentation, recording techniques, and quantification of responses.In Prokasy, W. F., and Christie, D. C. (eds.):Electrodermal Activity in Psychological Research. New York, Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. S. Raich
    • 1
  • H. D. Kimmel
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South FloridaTampa

Personalised recommendations