Cherchez la différence!

  • H. D. Kimmel


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brogden, W. J., Lipman, E. A. and Culler, A. J.: The role of incentive in conditioning and extinction.Am. J. Psychol.,51:109–117, 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kimble, G. A.:Hilgard and Marquis’ Conditioning and Learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts (2nd edition), 1961.Google Scholar
  3. Kimmel, H. D.: Inhibition of the unconditioned response in classical conditioning.Psychol. Rev.,73:232–240, 1966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kimmel, H. D.: Instrumental conditioning of autonomically mediated behavior.Psychol. Bull.,67:337–345, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Konorski, J.:Conditioned Reflexes and Neuron Organization. Cambridge: The University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
  6. Logan, F. A.: From free responding to discrete trials.Am. Psychol.,21:698 (Asbtract), 1966.Google Scholar
  7. Miller, N. E.: Experiments relevant to learning theory and psychopathology.Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Psychology, 1966.Google Scholar
  8. Miller, S. and Konorski, J.: Sur une forme particuliere des reflexes conditionels. Proceedings of the Biological Society. Paris,99:1155–1157, 1928.Google Scholar
  9. Mowrer, O. H.:Learning Theory and Behavior. New York: Wiley, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Prokasy, W. E.: Classical eyelid conditioning: Experimenter operations, task demands, and response shaping.In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.),Classical Conditioning: A Symposium. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965; pp. 208–225.Google Scholar
  11. Razran, G.: Evolutionary psychology: Levels of learning and perception and thinking.In B. B. Wolman (Ed.),Scientific Psychology, New York: Basic Books, 1965; pp. 207–253.Google Scholar
  12. Rescorla, R. A. and Solomon, R. L.: Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.Psychol. Rev.,74:151–182, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schlosberg, H.: The relationship between success and the laws of conditioningPsychol. Rev.,44:379–394, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schoenfeld, W. N.: Some old work for modem conditioning theory.Cond. Reflexes,4:219–223, 1966.Google Scholar
  15. Shapiro, M. M. and Miller, T. M.: On the relationship between conditioned and discriminative stimuli and between instrumental and consummatory responses.In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.),Classical Conditioning: A Symposium. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965; pp. 269–301.Google Scholar
  16. Sheffield, R. D.: Relation between classical conditioning and instrumental learning.In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.),Classical Conditioning: A Symposium, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965; pp. 302–321.Google Scholar
  17. Sidman, M.:Tactics of Scientific Research. New York: Basic Books, 1960.Google Scholar
  18. Skinner, B. F.:Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1953.Google Scholar
  19. Skinner, B. F.: Two types of conditioned reflex and a pseudo type.J. Genet. Psychol.,12, 274–286, 1935.Google Scholar
  20. Turner, L. H. and Solomon, R. L.: Human traumatic avoidance learning: Theory and experiments on the operant-respondent distinction and failures to learn.Psychol. Monographs,40:Whole No. 559, 1962.Google Scholar
  21. Verplanck, W. S. and Skinner, B. F.:In W. K. Estes,et al. (Eds.),Modern Learning Theory, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1954; pp. 267–316.Google Scholar
  22. Williams, D. R.: Classical conditioning and incentive motivation.In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.),Classical Conditioning: A Symposium, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965; pp. 340–357.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. D. Kimmel
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South FloridaTampa

Personalised recommendations