CS Intensity effects on rabbit nictitating membrane conditioning, extinction and generalization
- 68 Downloads
One purpose of the present experiments was to determine if the Grice and Hunter (1964) observation of augmented within-versus between-Ss CS intensity effects in human eyelid conditioning would be obtained in conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response under two (Experiment 1) and four (Experiment 2) CS intensity values. In addition, a determination was made of the effects of CS intensity upon extinction and stimulus intensity generalization gradients. The studies revealed that: (a) while acquisition performance was positively related to CS intensity, the effect was independent of the between and within-S manipulation of CS intensity; (b) rate of response decrement in extinction was an inverse function of CS intensity; and (c) a positively sloped intensity generalization gradient was obtained when the training stimulus was the low-intensity one. Overall, these results are most consistent with Hull’s (1949) stimulus intensity dynamism account of CS intensity effects in conditioning.
KeywordsConditioned Stimulus Nictitate Membrane Generalization Gradient Generalization Testing Eyelid Conditioning
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Frey, P. W.: Within- and between-session CS intensity performance effects in rabbit eyelid conditioning.Psychonom. Sci.,17:1–2, 1969.Google Scholar
- Gormezano, I.: Classical conditioning.In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.)Experimental Methods and Instrumentation in Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.Google Scholar
- Grice, G. R.: Conditioning and a decision theory of response evocation, in G. H. Bower (Ed.)Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
- Hovland, C. I.: The generalization of conditioned responses: II. The sensory generalization of conditioned responses with varying intensities of tone.J. Genet. Psychol.,51:279–291, 1937.Google Scholar
- Hull, C. L.:Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.Google Scholar
- Hull, C. L.:A behavior system. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
- Kamin, L. J.: Temporal and intensity characteristics of the conditioned stimulus.In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.)Classical Conditioning: A Symposium. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.Google Scholar
- Pavlov, I. P.:Conditioned reflexes. (Translated by G. V. Anrep). London: Oxford University Press, 1927.Google Scholar