Advertisement

Sugar Tech

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 6–11 | Cite as

Rapid toxin test for red-rot disease in sugarcane

  • D. B. Olufolaji
Article

Abstract

Studies were carried out to produce toxins fromColletotrichum falcatum which was also bioassayed by screening themin vitro andin vivo on ten sugarcane varieties, in order to determine their resistance and susceptibility. The toxin was produced from liquid culture inoculated with the fungus which was later sieved and used in the crude form. Further partial purifications and characterisation was carried out using series of standard tests and methods. During the bioassay and screening tests, it was observed that, of all the ten sugarcane varieties, CP70/1133 and LSI-803 were fairly resistant but CP70/1133 showed more resistant attributes than LSI-083. The movement of the toxin was towards the apical region of the plant parts. This is an indication that the pathogen action moves upward as the plant grows.

Key Words

Colletotrichum falcatum sugarcane resistance susceptibility toxin bioassay screening 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agnihotri, V.P. (1990). Diseases of Sugarcane and Sugarbeet. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. India. Pp. 483.Google Scholar
  2. Anon (1957). Experi mental Station. Hawaii Sugar Plant Assoc. Ann. Rept. Pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
  3. Anon (1982). The World’s Sugar Production With Relative Contribution of cane for a period of 13 decades (1950–1980). Sugar-Y-Azucar Year Book (1982) p. 46.Google Scholar
  4. Egan, B.T. (1969). Red rot in North Queensland. Soc. Sugarcane Technol.36: 73 - 75.Google Scholar
  5. Olufolaji, D.B. and Bamgboye, O.A. (1986). Production, partial characterisation and bioassay of toxin fromPhysalospora tucumanensis Speg — Sugarcane red-rot fungus. Cryptogamie Mycologie 1986,7: 331 - 334.Google Scholar
  6. Olufolaji, D.B. (1990). Studies on the red rot disease of sugarcane caused byPhysalospora tucumanensis Speg. Ph. D. Thesis University of Ilorin. Ilorin. Nigeria. 1990. Pp. 122.Google Scholar
  7. Olufolaji, D.B. (1998). Aspects of fungicidal control of wet rot ofAmaranthus caused byChoanephora cucurbitarum (Berk & Rav) Thaxt. Appl. Trop. Agric.3 (2): 75 - 79.Google Scholar
  8. Olufolaji, D.B. (1999). Effects ofColletotrichum falcatum (red rot fungus) on the mophorlogy and yield attributes of sugarcane in Nigeria. Sugarcane Pathology, eds. G.P. Rao, A. Bergamin Filho, R. Magarey and L.J.C. Autrey, Sci. Publ. Inc. Enfield. USA. Pp. 155 - 163.Google Scholar
  9. Ricaud, C., Egan, B.T., Gihaspie, A.C. and Hughes, C.G. (1989). Diseases of Sugarcane — Major Diseases. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 399.Google Scholar
  10. Sandhu, S.S., Bhati, D.S. and Ratan, B.K. (1969). Extent of losses in sugar cane caused by red rot and smut. Jour. Res. Loudhiana.6: 341 - 344.Google Scholar
  11. Singh, K., Tripathi, B.K. and Padney, S. (1983). Screening of sugar cane varietal crosses for resistance to red rot. Proc. Of XVIII Int. Soc. Of Sug. Technol. Cong. Cuba 1983.2: 373 -390.Google Scholar
  12. Thaung, M.M. (1970). Epiphytotics of sugarcane in Burma. PI. Dis. Rptr.54: 427.Google Scholar
  13. Viswanathan, R., Padmanaban P., Mohanraj, D. and Jothi, R. (1999). Rapid Detection of Red Rot (Colletotrichum falcatum) in Sugarcane and Evaluation of Host Reaction by ELISA. Sugarcane Pathology, eds. G.P. Rao, A. Bergamin Filho, R. Magarey and L.J.C. Autrey, Sci. Publ. Inc., Enfield, NH. USA. Pp. 35 - 46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. B. Olufolaji
    • 1
  1. 1.The Federal University of TechnologyAkureNigeria

Personalised recommendations