Skip to main content
Log in

Optimum site of fenestra in footplate of stapes during stapedectomy

  • Original/Main article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our previous studies have shown that fenestra in the footplate is one of the factors affecting the end result in stapedectomy. We have previously studied the effect of size of the fenestra small, medium, large or whole footplate removed. In this paper the site of small or medium fenestra (i.e. Anterior, Middle or posterior part of footplate) in relation to the hearing improvement has been analysed. It has been concluded that middle and posterior part of footplate are practically more convenient sites of fenestration but if adequate fenestra seal is provided and the length of piston measured accurately, the site is not a critical factor in end result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anson barry J. and Donatdson James A. (1967): The surgical anatomy of the temporal bone and car. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aitman, Franz (1962): Histopathology and Etiology of Otosclerosis. A critical review, pp. 15–42. Otosclerosis Henry Ford Hospital International symposium. Little Brown and Company. Boston. Ed. Schuknecht. Horold F.

  3. Bhardwaj, B. K., and Kacker, S. K. (1988): Revision Stapedectomy.J. Laryng Otol. 102: 20–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cottle Robert D. and Tonndorf Juergen (1966): Mechanical aspects of stapedactomy substution.Arc. Otol. 83: 547–551.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feldman, B.A., and Schuknecht H. F. (1970): Experiences with revision stapedectomy procedure.Laryngoscope 80: 1281–1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisch, U. (1980): Tympanoplasty and Stapedectomy — A manual of techniques.Thiemc stration. New York, pp 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fisch, U. (1982): Stapedotomy Versus Stapedectomy.A. M. J. Otol. 4: 112.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kessel, J, (1876): Quoted by Schuknecht (1971).

  9. Kacker, S.K. (1971): Iatrogenic Peri-Lymphatic fistula (Post Stapedectomy)Annal LAMS 8: 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kacker S. K. (1973): Etiopathology of delayed failure in stapedectomy. (1973):Ind. J. Otol. Rhin. Laryng. 25: 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McGee, T. M. (1981): Comparison of small fenestra and total stapedectomy.Ann. Otol. Rhin. Laryng 90: 633–639.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nylen, B. (1949): Histopathological investigations on the Localisation, number, activity and extent of olosclerotic foci:J. Laryng. & Otol. 63: 321–327.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruedi, L. and Spondlin — H (1957): Stapes Mobilisation Histologischer Atlas. Fortschr Hals Nasen-Ohrenbeilk. Vol.IV Basle and New York S. Karger.pp 1–84.

  14. Shea, J. J. (1982): Stapedectomy-Long term results:Ann. Otol. rhin. Laryng. 91: 516–520.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schuknecht, Harold F. (1971): Stapedectomy. Little Brown and Company,Boston

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wright, A. (1987): Scott Brown’s Oto-LaryngologyVol.1 15th Edition Basic Sciences Ed. Wright David Butterworths International Edition,London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kacker, S.K. Optimum site of fenestra in footplate of stapes during stapedectomy. Indian J Otolaryngol 43, 169–171 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02994571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02994571

Keywords

Navigation