Brain stem auditory evoked response-evaluation of hearing loss
- 30 Downloads
This paper studies the effect of otologic disease on the Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Response (BAER). Both conductive and neurosensory hearing losses are analyzed by plotting wave V latencies and amplitude as a function of sound intensity. It was found that BAER is elicited primarily by frequencies greater than 2000 Hz. Conductive hearing losses produce a latency-intensity function which approaches the norm with high decibel stimulation. Neurosensory losses produce a variety of latency intensity functions. In determining the degree of hearing loss, wave threshold is found to be the best index. Wave latency at high decibels is found to have little correspondence to degree of neurosensory loss ; wave amplitude is highly variable among subjects but still a useful indicator for detecting pathology.
KeywordsHearing Loss Bone Conduction Acoustic Neuroma Conductive Hearing Loss Wave Versus
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Gupta, D. and Vishwakarma, S.K. (1989): Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Response - A Study in Parameters.Ind. J. Otolaryngology,41 : 6–8Google Scholar
- 6.Hecox, K. (1983): Development of auditory brain stem responses in Gerber and Menchen (Eds.) : The development of auditory behaviour. New York, Grune and Stratton Inc.Google Scholar
- 8.Jergcr. J., Mauldin, L. (1978): Prediction of sensoryneural hearing level from the brain stem evoked responses.Arch. Otolaryngol. 104 : 456–461.Google Scholar
- 10.Moller, A.R. (1974): Function of the middle ear, in Keidel, W.D., Nefl, W.D. (eds.) : Handbook of sensory physiology. Berlin, Springer Verlag. Vol. V/I, 494–498.Google Scholar
- 11.Picton, T.W., Woods, D.L., Baribeau-Braun, J.et al. (1977): Evoked potential audiometry.J. Otolaryngol. 6 : 90–118.Google Scholar
- 14.Von Bekesy, G. (1960): Experiments in hearing. New York, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar