Indian Journal of Otolaryngology

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 54–58 | Cite as

Brain stem auditory evoked response-evaluation of hearing loss

  • Deepak Gupta
  • S. K. Vishwakarma


This paper studies the effect of otologic disease on the Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Response (BAER). Both conductive and neurosensory hearing losses are analyzed by plotting wave V latencies and amplitude as a function of sound intensity. It was found that BAER is elicited primarily by frequencies greater than 2000 Hz. Conductive hearing losses produce a latency-intensity function which approaches the norm with high decibel stimulation. Neurosensory losses produce a variety of latency intensity functions. In determining the degree of hearing loss, wave threshold is found to be the best index. Wave latency at high decibels is found to have little correspondence to degree of neurosensory loss ; wave amplitude is highly variable among subjects but still a useful indicator for detecting pathology.


Hearing Loss Bone Conduction Acoustic Neuroma Conductive Hearing Loss Wave Versus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Berlin, C.I., Gondra M.I., Casey al. (1978): Bone conduction electro-cochleography : Clinical applications.Laryngoscope 88 : 756–763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coats, A.L. (1978): Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses.Arch. Otolaryngol. 104 : 709–717.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coats, A.C., Martin, J.L. (1977): Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses.Arch. Otolaryngol. 103 : 605–622.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, H.; Hirsh, S.K. (1976): The audiometric utility of brain stem responses to low frequency sounds.Audiology 15 : 181–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta, D. and Vishwakarma, S.K. (1989): Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Response - A Study in Parameters.Ind. J. Otolaryngology,41 : 6–8Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hecox, K. (1983): Development of auditory brain stem responses in Gerber and Menchen (Eds.) : The development of auditory behaviour. New York, Grune and Stratton Inc.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hicks, G.E. (1980): ABR sensory assessment by bone conduction masking.Arch. Otolaryngol. 106 : 392–395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jergcr. J., Mauldin, L. (1978): Prediction of sensoryneural hearing level from the brain stem evoked responses.Arch. Otolaryngol. 104 : 456–461.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGee, T.J., Clemis, J.D. (1982): Effects of conductive hearing loss on auditory brain stem response.Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 91 : 304–309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moller, A.R. (1974): Function of the middle ear, in Keidel, W.D., Nefl, W.D. (eds.) : Handbook of sensory physiology. Berlin, Springer Verlag. Vol. V/I, 494–498.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Picton, T.W., Woods, D.L., Baribeau-Braun, al. (1977): Evoked potential audiometry.J. Otolaryngol. 6 : 90–118.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Selters, W.A., Brackman, D.E. (1977): Acoustic tumor detection with brain stem electric response audiometry.Arch. Otolaryngol. 103 : 181–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Starr, A., Achor, I.J. (1975): Auditory-brain stem responses in Neurological disease.Arch. Neurol. 32 : 761–768.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Von Bekesy, G. (1960): Experiments in hearing. New York, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deepak Gupta
    • 1
  • S. K. Vishwakarma
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyJ. N. Medical College, A.M.U.Aligarh

Personalised recommendations