Journal of Genetics

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 325–362 | Cite as

The causes of domestication: an attempt to integrate some ideas of konrad lorenz with evolution theory

With plate 4 and one text-figure
  • H. Spurway


Allopatric cultivation, usually alters the habitat, and captivity, by definition, removes the developmental systems from the range of environmental stimuli for which they have been stabilized.


Selection Pressure Domestic Animal Behaviour Pattern Wild Animal Haldane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adrian, E. D. (1954). Anniversary Address, 1953.Proc. Roy. Soc. B,221, 143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (1948). Hybridization of the habitat.Evolution,2, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrngton, Daines (1773). Experiments and observations on the singing of birds.Phil. Trans.63, 240–91.Google Scholar
  4. Bastock, M., Morris, D. &Moynihan, M. (1953). Some comments on conflict and thwarting in animals.Behaviour,6, 66–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair, W. F. &Howard, W. E. (1944). Experimental evidence of sexual isolation between three forms of mice of the cenospeciesPeromyscus maniculatus.Contr. Lab. Vertebr. Biol. Univ. Mich.26.Google Scholar
  6. Bogert.C. M. (1949). Thermoregulation in reptiles—a factor in evolution.Evolution,3, 195–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridges, C. B. &Brehme, K. S. (1944). The mutants ofDrosophila melanogasler.Publ. Carneg. Inst. no. 552.Google Scholar
  8. Calderwood, D. (1842-1849).The History of the Kirk of Scotland (8 vols.). Ed. Rev. Thomas Thompson.Google Scholar
  9. Callan, H. G. &Spurway, H. (1951). A study of meiosis in interracial hybrids of the newtTriturus cristatus.J. Genet.50, 235–49.Google Scholar
  10. CarpenTEr, C. R. (1952). Social behaviour of non-human primates.Structure et Physiologic des Societes Animates—Colloques internationaux C.N.R.S.34, 227–46. Paris.Google Scholar
  11. Case, E. M. &Haldane, J. B. S. (1941). Tastes of oxygen and nitrogen at high pressures.Nature, Lond.,148, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caspari, E. (1952). Pleiotropie gene action.Evolution,6, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, E. &Aronson, L. R. (1951). Sexual behavior in the guppyLebistes reticulatus (Peters).Zoologica, N.Y.,36, 44–66.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, E. L. R., Aronson, L. R. &Gordon, M. (1954). Mating behaviour patterns in two sympatric species of xiphophorin fishes: their inheritance and significance in sexual isolation.Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.103, 135–226.Google Scholar
  15. Craig, W. (1918). Appetites and aversions as constituents of instincts.Bull. Biol.34, 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craik, K. J. W. (1943).The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Darling, F. (1939).A Naturalist on Rona. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Darwin, C. (1859).On the Origin of Species. Reprinted 1950. London: Watts and Co.Google Scholar
  19. Darwin, C. (1875).The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, 2nd ed. 2 vols. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  20. Davies, J. L. (1949). Observati ons on the grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) at Ramsey island, Pembrokeshire.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond.119, 673–692.Google Scholar
  21. Dechambre, E. (1941). De la domestication considéree comme un milieu biologique.Bull. Soc. Acclim. fr. pp. 77–130.Google Scholar
  22. Dechambre, E. (1944). Quelques réflexions sur l’histoire et l’origine des lévriers.Conférences Soc. Acclim. Fr. pp. 29–4S.Google Scholar
  23. Delaoour, J. (1951).The Pheasants of the World. London: Country Life Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. Dice, L. R. (1952).Natural Communities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  25. Dobziiansky, Th. (1951).Genetics and the Origin of Species, 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dobzhassky, Th. &Pavlovsky, O. (1953). Indeterminate outcome of certain experiments onDrosophila, populations.Evolution,7, 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Euler, C. von (1953). A preliminary note on slow hypothalamic ‘osmo-potentials’.Skand. Arch. Physiol.29, 133.Google Scholar
  28. Fabricius, E. (1951). Zur Ethologie junger Anatiden.Acta zool. fenn.68, 1–178.Google Scholar
  29. Fabrioius, E. &Boyd, H. (1954). Experiments on the following-reaction of ducklings.The Wildfwl Trust Slimbridge Gloucestershire U.K. 6th Annual Report, 1952-1953, pp. 84–9.Google Scholar
  30. Farris, E. J. (ed.) (1950).The Care and Breeding of Laboratory Animals. New York: John Wiley; London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Fisher, B. A. (1938). Dominance in poultry. Feathered feet, rose comb, internal pigment and pile.Proc. Roy. Soc. B,125, 25–48.Google Scholar
  32. Ford, E. B. (1953). The genetics of polymorphism in the Lepidoptera.Advanc. Genet.5, 87.Google Scholar
  33. Forde, Daryll (1934).Habitat, Economy and Society. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  34. Gordon, C., Spurway, H. &Street, P. A. B. (1939). An analysis of three wild populations ofDrosophila subobscura.J. Genet.38, 37–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gordon, M. (1950). Fishes as laboratory animals inThe Care and Breeding of Laboratory Animals. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.; New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Gordon, M. (1951). Genetic and correlated studies of normal and atypical pigment cell growth.Growth, Symposium,10, 153–219.Google Scholar
  37. Göz, H. (1941). Uber den Art—und Individualgeruch bei Fischen.Z. vergl. Physiol.19, 1–45.Google Scholar
  38. Gray, A. P. (1954).Mammalian Hybrids. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, Bucks, England.Google Scholar
  39. Grüneberg, H. (1952).The Genetics of the Mouse, 2nd. ed. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  40. Hagedoorn, A. L. (1949). The ‘waltzing’ ferret and its origin.Genetilca,24, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hagerup, O. (1951). Pollination in the Faroes—in spite of rain and poverty of insects.Dan. Biol. Medd.18, no. 15, 1–48.Google Scholar
  42. Haldane, J. B. S. (1924). Äber Halluzinationen infolge von Änderungen des Kohlensauredrucks.Psychol. Forsch.5, 356–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Haldane, J. B. S. (1954a).The Biochemistry of Genetics. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  44. Haldane, J. B. S. (1954b). A logical analysis of learning, conditioning and related processes.Behaviour,6, 256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Haldane, J. B. S. (1954c). La signalisation animale.Année, biol.58, 89–98.Google Scholar
  46. Haldane, J. B. S. &Spubway, H. (1954). A statistical analysis of communication inApis mellifera, and a comparison with communication in other animals.Insectes Sociaux,1, 247–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Haldane, J. S. &Priestley, J. G. (1935).Respiration. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hammond, J. (1940).Farm animals. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  49. Harland, W. C. (1941). Genetical studies in the genusGossypium and their relationship to evolutionary and taxonomic problems.Proc. 7th Int. Genet. Congr. 1939 (Edinb.). Issued as a supplementary volume toJ. Genet. pp. 138–43.Google Scholar
  50. Harper, F. (1945).Extinct and Vanishing Mammals of the Old World. American Committee for International Wild Life Protection: Special Publication no. 12. New York Zoological Park, N.Y.Google Scholar
  51. Hebb, D. O. (1953). Heredity and environment in mammalian behaviour.Brit. J. Anim. Behav.1, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hediger, H. (1949). Saugetier-Territorien und ihre Markierung.Bijdr. Dierk,28, 172–84.Google Scholar
  53. Hediger, H.(1950).Wild Animals in Captivity. London: Butterworth’s Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  54. Hediger, H. (1952). Beitrage zur Saugetier-Soziologie.Structure et Physiologic des Sociétés Animales—Collogues Internationaux du C.N.R.S.34, 297–321.Google Scholar
  55. Hediger, H. (1954). Are wild animals in captivity really wild?Scien. Amer.190, 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hellmich, W. C. (1951). On ecotypic and autotypic characters, a contribution to the knowledge of the evolution of the genusLiolaemus (Iguanidae).Evolution,5, 359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Heslop-Harrison, J. (1953a).New Concepts in Flowering-Plant Taxonomy. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  58. Heslop-Harrison, J. (1953b). Some problems of variation in the British dactylorchids.The S. East. Nat.58, 14–25.Google Scholar
  59. Heuts, M. J. (1953). Regressive evolution in cave animals.Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.7, 290–309.Google Scholar
  60. Hollingsworth, M. J. &Maynard Smith, J. (1955). The effects of inbreeding on rate of development and on fertility inDrosophila subobscura.J. Genet.53, 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Holst, E. von (1950). Die Arbeitsweise des Statolithen Apparatus bei Fisches.Z. vergl. Physiol.32, 60–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hutt, F. B. (1949).The Genetics of the Fowl. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  63. Innes, W. T. (1954). ExoticAquarium Fishes, 17th ed. Philadelphia: Innes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  64. Irwin.M. B. &Cole, L. J. (1936). Immunogenetic studies of species and of species hybrids in doves, and the separation of species-specific substances in the backoross.J. Exp. Zool.73, 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. James, W. (1890).The Principles of Psychology, vol. 2. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  66. Kalmus, H. (1955). The discrimination by the nose of the dog of individual human odours and in particular the odours of twins.Brit. J. Anim. Behav.3, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. King, H.D. (1939). Life processes in grey Norway rats during 14 years in captivity.Amer. Anat. Mem.17.Google Scholar
  68. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Mabtin, C. E. &Gebhard, P. H. (1953).Sexual Behaviour in the Human Female. Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
  69. Konorski, J. (1948).Conditioned Reflexes and Neuron Organisation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Koopman, K. F. (1950). Natural selection for reproductive isolation betweenDrosophila pseudoobscura andDrosophila persimilis.Evolution,4, 135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lamy, R. (1943). Hidden divergence in laboratory strains ofDrosophila pseudoobscura.Proc.Roy. Soc. Edinb. B,62, 9–19.Google Scholar
  72. Lamy, R. (1947). Observed spontaneous mutation rates in relation to experimental technique.J. Genet.48, 223–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lamy, R. (1948). The genetic basis of sterility in someDrosophila hybrids.J. Genet.49, 120–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lamy, R. (1949). The possible influence of major mutations on general or directional mutability of the genotype (with an appendix by J. B. S. Haldane).J. Genet.49, 192–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lang, A. (1910). Äber alternative Verenbung bei Hunden.Z. indukt. Abstam.-u. VererbLehre,3, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lehrman, D. S. (1953). A critique of Konrad Lorenz’s theory of instinctive behaviour.Quart. Rev. Biol28, 337–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lerner, I. M. (1954).Genetic Homoeoslasis. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  78. Lindner, K. (1950).La chasse prihistorique. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  79. Lissman, H. W. (1932). Die Umweltdes Kampffisches (Betta splendens Regan).Z.vergl.Physiol.18, 65–111Google Scholar
  80. Lorenz, K. Z. (1931). Beiträge zur Ethologie sozialer Corviden.J. Orn., Lpz.,79, 67–127.Google Scholar
  81. Lorenz, K. Z. (1935). Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels.J. Orn., Lpz.,83, 137–213, 289-413.Google Scholar
  82. Lorenz, K. Z. (1937). The companion in the bird's world.Auk,54, 245–73.Google Scholar
  83. Lorenz, K. Z. (1940). Durch Domestikation verursachte Storungen arteigenen Verhaltens.Z. angew. Psychol.59, 2–82.Google Scholar
  84. Lorenz, K. Z. (1943). Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung.Z. Tierpsychol.5, 235–409.Google Scholar
  85. Lorenz, K. Z. (1949).Er redete mil dem Vieh den Voegeln und den Fischen. Wien: Borotha-Schoeler.Google Scholar
  86. Lorenz, K. Z. (1950). The comparative method in studying innate behaviour patterns.Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.4, 221–68.Google Scholar
  87. Lorenz, K. Z. (1951). The role of Gestalt perception in animal and human behaviour. InAspects of Form. London and Bradford: Lund Humphries.Google Scholar
  88. Lorenz, K. Z. (1952).King Solomon’s Ring. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  89. Luciant, L. (1913).Human Physiology, Vol. 2, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  90. Mandevelle, L. C. &Spubway, H. (1949). The development of hybrids betweenRana esculenta andRana ridibunda.Brit. J. Herpet.1, 39–50.Google Scholar
  91. Marler, P. (1952). Variation in the song of the chaffinchFringilla coelebs.Ibis,94, 458–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mason, I. L. (1951).A World Dictionary of Breeds and Varieties of Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Earnham Royal, Bucks, England.Google Scholar
  93. Mayr, E. (1946a). Experiments on sexual isolation inDrosophila. VI. Isolation betweenDrosophila pseudoobscura andDrosophila persimilis and their hybrids.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.,32, 57–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Mayr, E. (1946b). Experiments on sexual isolation inDrosophila. VII. The nature of the isolating mechanisms betweenDrosophila pseudoobscura andDrosophila persimilis.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.,32, 128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mayr, E. (1948). The bearing of the new systematics on genetical problems. The nature of species.Advanc. Genet.2, 205–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Mayr, E. (1950). The role of the antennae in the mating behaviour of femaleDrosophila.Evolution,4, 149–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Mayr, E. (1951). Speciation in birds.Proc. 10th Int. Ornith. Corigr. Uppsala, 1950, pp. 91–131.Google Scholar
  98. Mayr, E. (1954). Change of genetic environment and evolution. InEvolution as a Process, ed. J . s. Huxley. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  99. McDougall, W. (1923).An Outline of Psychology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  100. Medawar, P. B. (1953). Some immunological and endocrinological problems raised by the evolution of viviparity in vertebrates.Syrup. Soc. Exp. Biol.7, 320–38.Google Scholar
  101. Merrill, D. J. (1949a). Selective mating inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics,34, 370–89.Google Scholar
  102. Merrill, D. J. (1949b). Mating between two strains ofDrosophila, melanogaster.Evolution,3, 266–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Meteessel, M. (1940). Relationship of heredity and environment in behaviour.J. Psychol.10, 177–98.Google Scholar
  104. Mikulicz-Radecki, M. v. (1950). Studien iiber Musterung unci Farbung von Wild-mid Haustauben.Zool. Jb. (Physiol.),62, 211–354.Google Scholar
  105. Milani, R. (1951a). Osservazioni sul corteggiammento diDrosophila, subobscura Collin.R.C. Ist. lombardo (Class. Sci. Mat. e Nat.),84, 3–14.Google Scholar
  106. Milani, R. (1951b). Osservazioni comparative ed esperimenti sulle modalita del corteggiamento nelle cinque specie Europee del gruppo ‘obscura’.R.C. Ist. lombardo (Class. Sci. Mat. e Nat.),84, 48–58Google Scholar
  107. Minamori, S. (1952). Physiological isolation in Cobitidae I. Two races of the serrated spinous loach with special reference to the difference in then- embryonic respiration.J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ.13, 1–14.Google Scholar
  108. Moore, J. A. (1949). Patterns of evolution in the genusRana. InGenetics, Paleontology and Evolution, pp. 315-38. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Moore, J. A. (1954). Geographic and genetic isolation in Australian Amphibia.Proc. 9th Int. Genet. Congr. 1953 (Bellagio). Suppl. vol. toCaryologia,6.Google Scholar
  110. Moule, L. (1919). L’industrie mulassière dans l’antiquité.Bull. Soc. cent. Med. vét.Google Scholar
  111. Muller, H. J. (1942). Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature.Biol. Symp.6, 71–125.Google Scholar
  112. Owen, R. (1848).On the Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton. Van Voorst. London.Google Scholar
  113. Pantin, C. F. A. (1954). The recognition of species.Sci. Progr.42, 587–98.Google Scholar
  114. Patterson, J. T. &Stone, W. S. (1952).Evolution in the Genus Drosophila. New York: Macnullan Company.Google Scholar
  115. RÄber, H. (1948). Analyse des Balzverhaltens eines domestizierten Truthahns. (Meleagris).Behaviour,1, 237–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Rendel, J. M. (1945). Genetics and cytology ofDrosophila subobscura. II. Normal and selective mailings inDrosophila subobscura.J. Genet.46, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rendel, J. M. (1952). Mating of ebony vestigial and wild typeDrosophila melanogaster in light and dark.Evolution,5, 226–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Rendel, J. M. (1953). Heterosis.Amer. Nat.87, 129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Reyniers, J. A. (1953). Germ-free life. An unsigned report.Lancet, 31 Oct. 1953, pp. 933–4.Google Scholar
  120. Roberts, J. A. E. (1932). Colour inheritance in sheep. VI. The genetic constitution of the wild mouflon.J. Genet.25, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Romanes, G. J. (1885).Mental Evolution in Animals. With a posthumous essay on instinct by Charles Darwin. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  122. Romanes, G. J. (1892).Darwin, and After Darwin. I. The Darwinian Theory, London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
  123. Rosen, D. E. &Gordon, M. (1953). Functional anatomy and evolution of male genitalia in Poecilid fishes.Zoologica,38, 1–47.Google Scholar
  124. Rudkin, G. T. &Sohultz, J. (1949). A comparison of the tryptophane requirements of mutant and wild typeDrosophila melanogaster.Proc. 8th Int. Genet. Congr. 1948 (Stockh.) Lund: Issued as a supplementary volume ofHereditas, Lund, 1949, pp. 652–53.Google Scholar
  125. Sauer, C. O. (1952).Agricultural Origins and Dis’persals. Bowman Memorial Lectures, 2. American Geographical Society.Google Scholar
  126. Searle, A. G. (1949). Gene frequencies in London’s cats.J. Genet.49, 214–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Seitz, A. (1940-2). Die Paarbildung bei einigen Cichliden.Z. Tierpsychol.4, 40–84;5, 74-101.Google Scholar
  128. Shaw, G. B. (1921).Bach to Methuselah. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  129. Sherrington, C. S. (1906).The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  130. Smith, Hugh M. (1945).The fresh-water fishes of Siam, or Thailand. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. no. 188.Google Scholar
  131. Sonneborn, T. M. (1947). Recent advances in the genetics ofParamecium andEuplotes.Advanc. Genet.1, 263–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Spalding, D. A. (1873). Instinct With original observations on young animals.Macmillan’s Magazine,27, 282–93. Reprinted inBrit. J. Anim. Behav.2, 1-11.Google Scholar
  133. Spencer, W. P. (1947). Mutations in wild populations inDrosophila.Advanc. Genet.1, 359–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Spieth, H. T. (1947). Sexual behaviour and isolation inDrosophila. I. The mating behaviour of species of the willistoni group.Evolution,1, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Spieth, H. T. (1951). Mating behaviour and sexual isolation in theDrosophila virilis species group.Behaviour,3, 105–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Spurway, H. (1949). Remarks on Vavilov’s law of homologous variation.Ric. sci.19 (Suppl.), 3–9.Google Scholar
  137. Spurway, H. (1952). Can wild animals be kept in captivity?New Biol.13, 11–30.Google Scholar
  138. Spurway, H. (1953a). Territory and evolution in sticklebacks.New Biol.14, 33–43.Google Scholar
  139. Spurway, H. (1953b). The escape drive in domestic cats and the dog and cat relationship.Behaviour,5, 81–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Spurway, H. (1953c). Genetics of specific and subspecific differences in European newts.Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.7, 200–37.Google Scholar
  141. Spurway, H. (1955a). Taxonomic genetics of EuropeanTriturus (Urodela).Proc. 9th Int. Genet. Gongr. 1953 (Bellagio). Suppl. vol. toCaryologia,6.Google Scholar
  142. Spurway, H. (1955b). The sub-human capacities for species recognition and their correlation with reproductive isolation.Proc. 11th Ornithological Congr. 1954 (Basel).Google Scholar
  143. Spurway, H. &Haldane, J. B. S. (1953). The comparative ethology of vertebrate breathing. I. Breathing in newts, with a general survey.Behaviour,6, 8–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. SteBBinS, G. L.Jr. (1950).Variation and Evolution in Plants. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  145. Stockard, C. R. (1941).The Genetic and Endocrinic Basis for Differences in Form and Behaviour. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.Google Scholar
  146. Swann, M. M. (1953). The mechanism of cell division. A study with carbon monoxide on the sea urchin egg.Quart. J. Micr. Sci.94, 369–379.Google Scholar
  147. Thoday, J. M. (1953). Components of fitness.Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.7, 96–113.Google Scholar
  148. Thomson, G. M. (1922).The Naturalisation of Animals and Plants in New Zealand. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  149. Thorpe, W. H. (1950). The concepts of learning and their relation to those of instinct.Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.4, 287–408.Google Scholar
  150. Thorpe, W. H. (1951a). The definition of some terms used in animal behaviour studies.Bull. Anim. Behav.9, 34–40.Google Scholar
  151. Thorpe, W. H. (1951b). The learning abilities of birds.Ibis.93, 1–52, 252-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Thorpe, W. H. (1954). The process of song-learning in the chaffinch as studied by means of the sound spectrograph.Nature., Lond.,173, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. TinbERgEN, N. (1951).The Study of Instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  154. Tinbergen, N. (1952). ‘Derived’ activities; their causation, biological significance, origin, and emancipation during evolution.Quart. Rev. Biol.27, 1–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Tinbergen, N. (1953).Social Behaviour in Animals. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  156. Tinbergen, N. (1954). The origin and evolution of courtship and threat display. InEvolution as a Process pp. 233–50, ed. J. S. Huxley. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  157. Turesson, G. (1922). The species and the variety as ecological units.Hereditas, Lund,3, 100–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Verney, E. B. (1947). The antidiuretic hormone and the factors which determine its release.Proc. Roy. Soc. B,135, 25–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Wddington, C. H. (1953a). Genetic assimilation of an acquired character.Evolution,7, 118–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Wddington, C. H. (1953b). Epigenetics and evolution.Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.7, 186–99.Google Scholar
  161. Wallace, B. &Dobzhansky, Th. (1946). Experiments on sexual isolation inDrosophila. VIII. Influence of light on the mating behaviour ofDrosophila, subobscura, Drosophila persimilis, andDrosophila pseudoobscura.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.,32, 226–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Walter, Grey (1953).The Living Brain. London: Gerald Duckworth.Google Scholar
  163. Whitman, C. O. (1919). (Mitogenetic evolution in pigeons, ed. O. Riddle.Publ. Carneg. Instn, no.257.Google Scholar
  164. Worden, A. N. ed. (1947).The U.F.A.W. Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals. Edinburgh: Baillière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
  165. Wright, S. (1932). The roles of mutation, inbreeding, cross-breeding, and selection in evolution. Proc. 6thInt. Genet. Gongr. Ithaca,1, pp. 356–66.Google Scholar
  166. Wright, S. (1949). Adaptation and selection. InGenetics, Palaeontology and Evolution, pp. 365–89. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  167. Young, J. Z. (1954). Memory, heredity and information. InEvolution as a Process, pp. 281–99 ed. J. S. Huxley. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  168. Zupanoio, A. O. (1953). The mode of action of acetyl-choline.Slcand. Arch,. Physiol.29, 63–71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1955

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Spurway
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiometryUniversity CollegeLondon

Personalised recommendations