Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis and interpretation of the Michaelis-menten kinetics of immobilized enzymes perturbed by film diffusion

  • Published:
Journal of Solid Phase Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The determination of kinetic parameters such as the apparent Michaelis constant (Km app.) of enzymic reactions occurring at a mixed interface, that is, at a solid/liquid interface where the catalyst is bound to the solid phase, can lead to values that are too high when an unstirred layer is present. The perturbatior, for which an equation is derived in this paper, depends on the thickness of the unstirred layer, the maximal catalytic rate, and the diffusion constant. An additional error is introduced by the graphical determination of Km using the Lineweaver-Burk plot since after transformation the relation is not linear if an unstirred layer is present. A numerical example shows that apparent Michaelis constants obtained from in vitro experiments involving immobilized enzymes can lead to misleading results originating from conditions used in experiments such as stirring rate (CSTR-continuous stirred tank reactors) or flow rate (packed-bed reactors) of substrate. This can partly be explained by a greater bias of the Km determination caused by unstirred layers of the liquid medium (substrate) being present around the solid particles onto which the enzyme molecules are attached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laidler, K. J., andSundaram, P. V. (1971)In Chemistry of the Cell Interface, Part A, Academic Press, New York, p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sundaram, P. V. (1974)In Proceedings of the 2nd Enzyme Engineering conference,Pye, E. K. (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, p. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sundaram, P. V., Tweedale, A., andLaidler, K. J. (1970) Can. J. Chem. 48:1498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sundaram, P. V. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 321: 319.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sundaram, P. V., andJoy, K. W. (1978) J. Solid-Phase Biochem. 3: 223.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, D. M. (1972) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 266: 85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shàafi, R. I., Rich, G. T., Sidel, V. W., Bossert, W., andSolomon, A. K. (1967) J. Gen. Physiol. 50: 1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beck, R. E., andSchultz, J. S. (1972) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 255: 273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Andreoli, T. E., Dennis, V. W., andWeigl, A. M. (1969) J. Gen. Physiol. 53: 133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sundaram, P.V. An analysis and interpretation of the Michaelis-menten kinetics of immobilized enzymes perturbed by film diffusion. Journal of Solid Phase Biochemistry 3, 241–246 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02991850

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02991850

Keywords

Navigation