Digital elevation model (dem) for identification of groundwater prospective zones

  • S. Srinivasa Vittala
  • S. Govindaiah
  • H. Honne Gowda
Short Note


Remote Sensing Digital Elevation Model Groundwater Potential Zone Environmental System Research Institute Digital Elevation Model Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. ESRF (2001). ArcGIS, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Fels, J.E. and Matson, K.C. (1998). ACognitively-Based Approach for Hydrogeomorphic Land Classification Using Digital Terrain Models. 1998 ESRI User Conference Proceedings. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.Google Scholar
  3. GSI (1981). Geological and Mineralogical Map of Karnataka and Goa, Geological Survey of India.Google Scholar
  4. Imhof, E. (1982). Cartographic Relief Presentation, H. J. Steward (ed.), Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1982.Google Scholar
  5. Jean-Francois Moyen, Mudlappa Jayananda, Anne Nedelec and Herve Martin (2003). From the Roots to the Roof of a Granite: the Closepet Granite of South India.J. Geol. Soc. of India,62: 753–768.Google Scholar
  6. Jenson, S.K. and Domingue, J.O. (1988). Extracting Topographic Structure from Digital Elevation Data for Geographical Information System Analysis.Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,54(11): 1593–1600.Google Scholar
  7. Mark, D.M. (1984). Automatic Detection of Drainage Networks from Digital Elevation Models.Cartographica,21(2/3): 168–178.Google Scholar
  8. Martz, L.W. and Garbrecht, J. (1992). Numerical Definition of Drainage Network and Subcatch-ment Areas from Digital Elevation Models.Computers and Geosciences,18(6): 747–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moore, I.D., Grayson, R.B. and Ladson, A.R. (1991). Digital Terrain Modelling: A Review of Hydrological, Geomorphological and Biological Applications.Hydrological Processes,5(1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reddy, P.R.R. and Rangaswamy, C.Y. (1989). Groundwater Resources of Pavagada Taluk, Tumkur District. Groundwater Studies No. 240. Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  11. Tribe, A. (1992). Automated Recognition of Valley Heads from Digial Elevation Models.Earth Surface Processes & Landforms,16(1): 33–49.Google Scholar
  12. Vittala, S.S., Govindaiah, S. and Honne Gowda H. (2004). Morphometric Analysis of Sub-watersheds in the Pavagada Area of Tumkur District, South India Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques.J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing,32(4): 351 -362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vittala, S.S., Govindaiah, S. and Honne Gowda H. (2005). Evaluation of Groundwater Potential Zones in the Sub-watersheds of North Pennar River Basin around Pavagada, Karnataka, India using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques.J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing,33(4): 473–483.Google Scholar
  14. Youberg, A.D., Guertin, D.P. and Ball, G.L. (1998). Developing Stream-Watershed Relationships for Selecting Reference Site Characteristics Using ARC/ INFO. ESRI User Conference. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Srinivasa Vittala
    • 1
  • S. Govindaiah
    • 2
  • H. Honne Gowda
    • 3
  1. 1.Central Ground Water Board, Ministry of Water ResourcesMid-Eastern RegionPatnaIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeologyUniversity of MysoreMysoreIndia
  3. 3.Karnataka State Remote Sensing Applications CenterBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations