Advertisement

KSME International Journal

, Volume 18, Issue 11, pp 2009–2020 | Cite as

A parameter study for static and dynamic denting

  • Dong-Won Jung
  • M. J. Worswick
Article

Abstract

A parametric study of the factors controlling static and dynamic denting, as well as local stiffness, has been made on simplified panels of different sizes, curvatures, thicknesses and strengths. Analyses have been performed using the finite element method to predict dent resistance and panel stiffness. A parametric approach is used with finite element models of simplified panels. Two sizes of panels with square plan dimensions and a wide range of curvatures are analysed for several combinations of material thickness and strength, all representative of automotive closure panels. Analysis was performed using the implicit finite element code, LS-NIKE, and the explicit dynamic code, LS-DYNA for the static and dynamic cases, respectively. Panel dent resistance and stiffness behaviour are shown to be complex phenomena and strongly interrelated. Factors favouring improved dent resistance include increased yield strength and panel thickness. Panel stiffness also increases with thickness and with higher curvatures but decreases with size and very low curvatures. Conditions for best dynamic and static dent performance are shown to be inherently in conflict ; that is, panels with low stiffness tend to perform well under impact loading but demonstrate inferior static dent performance. Stiffer panels are prone to larger dynamic dents due to higher contact forces but exhibit good static performance through increased resistance to oil canning.

Key Words

Static Denting Dynamic Denting Parameter Study Finite Element Method Panel Stiffness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belytschko, T., Lin, J. I. and Tsay, C., 1984, “Explicit Algorithms for the Non-Linear Dynamics of Shells,”Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol.42, pp.225–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belytschko, T. and Tsay, C., 1983, “A Stabilization Procedure for the Quadrilateral Plate Element with One-Point Quadrature,”International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 19, pp. 405–419.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burley, C. E., Niemeier, B. A. and Koch, G. P., 1976, “Dynamic Denting of Autobody Panels,”SAE Technical Paper No. 760165.Google Scholar
  4. Burley, C. E. and Niemeier, B. A., 1977, “Denting Properties of Aluminum Autobody Components,”SAE Technical Paper No. 770199.Google Scholar
  5. DiCello, J. A. and George, R. A., 1974, “Design Criteria for the Dent Resistance of Auto Body Panels,”SAE Technical Paper No. 740081.Google Scholar
  6. Ekstrand, G. and Asnafi, N., 1998, “On Testing of the Stiffness and the Dent Resistance of Autobody Panels,”Materials and Design 19.Google Scholar
  7. Halquist, J. O., 1996, “LS-NIKE3D User’s Manual,”LSTC Report 1016, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Halquist, J. O., 1995, “LS-DYNA3D User’s 2020Google Scholar
  9. Manual,”LSTC Report 1082, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, T.E. and Schaffnit, W.O., 1973, “Dent Resistance of Cold-Rolled Low-Carbon Steel Sheet,”SAE Technical Paper No. 730528.Google Scholar
  11. Jung, D.W., 2002, “A Parametric Study of Sheet Metal Denting Using a Simplified Design Approach,”KSME International Journal, Vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 1479–1492.Google Scholar
  12. Kohmura, S. and Urbanek, J., 1977, “Dent Resistance of Aluminum Alloy Sheets,” Alcan International Ltd., KRDC Report, KR-77/044.Google Scholar
  13. Mahmood, H. F., 1981, “Dent Resistance of Surface Panel and Slam Area,”SAE Technical Paper No. 810099.Google Scholar
  14. Neimeier, B. A. and Burley, C. E., 1978, “Hailstone Response of Body Panels — Real and Simulated,”SAE Technical Paper No. 780398.Google Scholar
  15. Rolf, R. L., Sharp, M. L. and Stroebel, H. H., 1976, “Structural Characteristics of Aluminum Body Sheet,”SAE Technical Paper No. 770200.Google Scholar
  16. Shi, M. F., Brindza, J. A., Michel, P. F., Bucklin, P., Belanger, P. J. and Prencipe, J. M., 1997, “Static and Dynamic Dent Resistance Performance of Automotive Steel Body Panels,”SAE Technical Paper No. 970158.Google Scholar
  17. Swenson, W. E. and Trafkante, R. J., 1982, “The Influence of Aluminum Properties on the Design, Manufacturability and Economics of an Automotive Body Panel,”SAE Technical Paper No. 820385.Google Scholar
  18. Thomas, D., Hodgins, R. B., Worswick, M. J., Oddy, A. S., Gong, K. and Finn, M., 1999, “FEM Technique for Static & Dynamic Dent Modelling of Aluminum,”Proceedings of Numisheet ’99Volume I, Gelin, J. C. and Picart, P., Eds., pp. 367–372.Google Scholar
  19. Thorburn, H. J., 1994, “Comparitive Tests of Stiffness and Dent Resistance on Aluminum and Steel Fenders,”Proceedings IBEC ’94, International Body Engineering Conference, pp. 105–112.Google Scholar
  20. Vadhavkar, A. V., Fecek, M. G., Shah, V. C. and Swenson, W. E., 1981, “Panel Optimization Program (POP),”SAE Technical Paper No. 810230.Google Scholar
  21. Vreede, P. T., Tamis, P. J. and Roelofsen, M. E., 1995, “The Influence of Material Properties and Geometry on Dynamic Dent Resistance : Experiments and Simulations,”Proceedings IBEC ’95, International Body Engineering Conference, pp. 79–86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (KSME) 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCheju National UniversityJeju-doKorea
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations