Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical analysis for prediction of fatigue crack opening level

  • Published:
KSME International Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) is the most popular numerical method to simulate plasticity-induced fatigue crack closure and can predict fatigue crack closure behavior. Finite element analysis under plane stress state using 4-node isoparametric elements is performed to investigate the detailed closure behavior of fatigue cracks and the numerical results are compared with experimental results. The mesh of constant size elements on the crack surface can not correctly predict the opening level for fatigue crack as shown in the previous works. The crack opening behavior for the size mesh with a linear change shows almost flat stress level after a crack tip has passed by the monotonic plastic zone. The prediction of crack opening level presents a good agreement with published experimental data regardless of stress ratios, which are using the mesh of the elements that are in proportion to the reversed plastic zone size considering the opening stress intensity factors. Numerical interpolation results of finite element analysis can precisely predict the crack opening level. This method shows a good agreement with the experimental data regardless of the stress ratios and kinds of materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Δa :

Element size on crack surface

Δa ini :

Initial crack size

Δa fin :

Final crack size

H’ :

Linear strain hardening rate

k :

Correction factor

AK :

Stress intensity factor range

AK off :

Effective stress intensity factor range

K op :

Crack opening stress intensity factor

ΔL :

Stress range

R :

Stress ratio

α :

Poisson’s ratio

Δγρ :

Reversed plastic zone size

σ opP :

Crack opening stress

σ y :

Yield stress

ΔSeff :

Effective stress ranges

Smax :

Maximum stress

S ct :

Crack closing stress

AS :

Load range

U :

Effective stress intensity factor range ratio

U assume :

Assumed effective stress intensity factor range ratio

U cal :

Calculated effective stress intensity factor range ratio

References

  • Choi, H. C. and Song, J. H., 1995, “Finite Element Analysis of Closure Behaviour of Fatigue Cracks in Residual Stress Fields,”Fatigue Fract. Engng Mater. Struct., Vol. 18(1), pp. 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H. C., 2000, “A Study on the Determination of Closing Level for Finite Element Analysis of Fatigue Crack Closure,”KSME International Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 401–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H. C, 2003, “Finite Element Analysis for Fatigue Crack Closure Behavior Using Reversed Plastic Zone Size,”J. of KSME A, Vol. 27, No. 10, pp. 1703–1711, in Korea.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. Y., 1993, “Fatigue Crack Closure and Growth Behavior Under Random Loading,” Ph. D. Thesis, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.

  • Kurihara, M., Katoh, A. and Kawahara, M., 1987, “Effective of Stress Ratio and Step Loading on Fatigue Crack Propagation Rate,”Current Research on Fatigue (Edited by Tanaka, T, Jono M, Komai K.), Elsevier Applied Science, pp. 247–265.

  • McClung, R. C. and Sehitoglu, H., 1989, “On the Finite Element Analysis of Fatigue Crack Closure 1. Basic Modeling Issues,”Engng Fract. Mech., 33, pp. 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClung, R. C. and Sehitoglu, H., 1989, “On the Finite Element Analysis of Fatigue Crack Closure ’2. Numerical Results,”Engng Fract. Mech., 33, pp. 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClung, R.C., 1991, “Crack Closure and Plastic Zone Sizes in Fatigue,”Fatigue Fract. Engng Mater. Struct., 14(4), pp. 455–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. C, 1976, “A Finite-Element Analysis of Fatigue Crack Closure,”Mechanics of Crack Growth, ASTM STP 590, pp. 280–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. C, 1977, “Finite-Element Analysis of Crack Growth Under Monotonie and Cyclic Loading,”Cyclic Stress-Strain and Plastic Deformation Aspects of Fatigue Crack Growth, ASTM STP 637, pp. 56–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohji, K., Ogura, K. and Ohkubo, Y., 1974, “On the Closure of Fatigue Cracks Under Cyclic Tensile Loading,”Int. J. Fract., 10, pp. 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. J. R. and Fawkes, A. J., 1983, Engineering Fracture Mechanics: Numerical Method and Application, Pineridge Press Limited Swansea, U. K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. J., Earmme, Y. Y. and Song, J. H., 1997, “Determination of the Most Appropriate Mesh Size for a 2-d Finite Element Analysis of Fatigue Crack Closure Behaviour,”Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., Vol. 20(4), pp. 533–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. R., 1967, “Mechanics of Crack Tip Deformation and Extension by Fatigue,”Fatigue Crack Propagation ASTM STP 415, pp. 247–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solanki, K., Daniewicz, S. R. and Newman J. C, 2004, “Finite Element Analysis of Plasticity-Induced Fatigue Crack Closure: An Overview,”Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 71, pp. 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyeon Chang Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, H.C. Numerical analysis for prediction of fatigue crack opening level. KSME International Journal 18, 1989–1995 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990441

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990441

Key Words

Navigation