Journal of Genetics

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 51–57 | Cite as

Polymorphism inPoephila gouldiae gould

  • H. N. Southern


Double Dose Female Side Common Guillemot Black Feather Avowed Purpose 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldersparre, A. (1918).Poephila gouldiae × Peophila mirabilis, en Korsning mellan australiska Rafvarfåglar.Fauna och flora,13, 193.Google Scholar
  2. Anon. (1906–7). Gouldian finches.Avic. Mag. N.S.5, 191.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, A. G. (1905–6). The mutation of the Gouldian finch,Poephila mirabilis.Avic. Mag. N.S.4, 326.Google Scholar
  4. Cayley, N. W. (1932).Australian Finches in Bush and Aviary, p. 206. Sydney.Google Scholar
  5. Crew, F. A. E. andMunro, S. S. (1938). Gynandromorphism and lateral asymmetry in birds.Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 58, 114.Google Scholar
  6. Ford, E. B. (1941). Polymorphism and taxonomy. InThe New Systematics, ed. J. S. Huxley. Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Hall, R. (1902). Notes on a collection of bird skins from the Fitzroy River, North-west Australia. Part 2.Emu,2, 56.Google Scholar
  8. Harvey, S. (1926). A hermaphrodite Gouldian finch.Avic. Mag. Ser. 4,4, 286.Google Scholar
  9. Heumann,—. (1909).Gefiederte Welt, p. 149 (quoted in Stresemann).Google Scholar
  10. Hill, G. F. (1911). Field notes on birds of Kimberley, N.W. Australia.Emu,10, 289.Google Scholar
  11. Huxley, J. S. (1942).Evolution. London.Google Scholar
  12. Legendre, M. (1936). Les variations de plumage et de forme chez les oiseaux. 3. Polymorphisme et dimorphisme.Oiseau, N.S.6, 567.Google Scholar
  13. Macklin, C. H. (1928). Elevage des diamants de Gould.Oiseau,9, 72.Google Scholar
  14. Mayr, E. (1943).Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York.Google Scholar
  15. Mayr, E. andAmadon, D. (1941). Birds collected during the Whitney South Seas Expedition 46. Geographical variation inDemigretta sacra (Gm.).Amer. Mus. Novit. no. 1144.Google Scholar
  16. Page, W. T. (undated).Foreign Birds for Beginners, p. 30. London.Google Scholar
  17. Serventy, D. L. (1943). The white phase of the giant fulmar (Macronectes giganteus) in Australia.Emu,42, 167.Google Scholar
  18. Southern, H. N. (1943). The two phases ofStercorarius parasiticus L.Ibis,85, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Southern, H. N. (1944). Dimorphism inStercorarius pomarinus (Temm.).Ibis,86, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Southern, H. N. andReeve, E. C. R. (1941). Quantitative studies in the geographical variation of birds. The common guillemot (Uria aalge Pont.).Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 111 A, 255.Google Scholar
  21. Stresemann, E. (1924). Mutationsstudien XXI.Poephila mirabilis des Murs.J. Orn., Lpz.,72, 547.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1945

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. N. Southern
    • 1
  1. 1.Bureau of Animal PopulationUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations