Main particulate matter components in Saxony (Germany)
- 207 Downloads
Aerosol filter samples have been collected nearby the industrialised basin of Leipzig in Saxony (Germany) at the research station Melpitz of the Institut für Troposphärenforschung e.V. (IfT). Time series (1992–1998) and a three year comparison (1995–1997) of two different aerosol filter sampling systems, the Sierra-Andersen-PM 10 high volume sampler (daily sample, PM 10 inlet) and the Rupprecht and Patashnik Co. Inc. Model Partisol 2000 (weekly sample, PM 10 and PM 2.5 inlet) are presented and discussed. The comparison of the different sampling systems and strategies yields small differences between the daily and weekly samples for mass and different ions, which may be influenced by sampling duration and flow rates. A general trend of change in aerosol composition was observed: Soot and Sulphate concentrations decreased whereas Nitrate and Ammonium concentrations increased. During summers the mass of coarse particles is higher than in other seasons. One reason could be found in the occurence of longer periods of dry ground surfaces enabling reemission of crustal and biological material.
The time series have been integrated in a longer historical aerosol mass trend for Saxony and do show a good agreement. Since 1990 a significant downward trend in gravimetric mass concentration was found.
KeywordsAir quality aerosols ammonium, aerosol calcium, aerosol filter sampling harmonic analysis health effects magnesium, aerosol nitrate, aerosol particulate matter components potassium, aerosol sulphate, aerosol SO2 emissions time series
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bowes III,S.;Swift, D. (1986): Aerosol deposition in the human oral passage during natural oronasal breathing. In Aerosol — Formation and Reactivity. Proceedings of the 2nd International Aerosol Conference, Berlin 1986, Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York 197–199Google Scholar
- Mc Dow, S.R.;Huntzicker, J.J. (1990): Vapor adsorption artifact in the sampling of organic aerosol: Face velocity effects. Atmos. Environ.,24A, 2563–2571Google Scholar
- Erisman, J.W.;Mennen, M.G.;Fowler, D.;Flechard, C.R.;Spindler, G.;Grüner, A.;Duyzer, J.H.;Ruigrok, W.;Wyers, G.P. (1996): Towards development of a deposition monitoring network for air pollution of Europe. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, Report 722108015Google Scholar
- Müller, K. (1998): A 3-year study of the aerosol in Northwest Saxony (Germany). Atmos. Environ. (in press)Google Scholar
- Römer, F.G.;Veldkamp, A.A. (1994): Test results of a selected aerosol sampler to be applied in the Commission of European Countries LIFE Project. Royal Dutch Institute for Electronic Materials (KEMA), NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Spindler, G.;Mölders, N.;Hansz, J.;Beier, N.;Kramm, G. (1996): Determining the dry deposition of SO2 O3, NO, and NO2 at the SANA core station Melpitz. Meteorol Zeitschrift NF,5, 205–220Google Scholar
- Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Düsseldorf (1996): Chemical analysis of elemental carbon by extraction and thermal desorption of organic carbon. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, VDI 2465Google Scholar