Commentary on the dimming of the atomic future

Editorial: The Atomic Future


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Young, A.L., Chairman (1994): Balancing Radiation Benefits and Risks: The Needs of an Informed Public. Report ORAU 94/F29. Committee on Interagency Radiation Research and Policy Coordination. Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President. Available from NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Schroeder, N. (1999): Alternative energies expected to reap the same old environmental problems. ASMENEWS 18[3]:2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Watson, E.L. (1999): Smooth shipping: mitigating and avoiding conflict in shipping radioactive waste. RADWASTE 6[2]: 33–38Google Scholar
  4. [4] Scholar
  5. [5]
    Nordhaus W.D. (1997): The Swedish Nuclear Dilemma: Energy and the Environment. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. ISBN 0-915707-84-5Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    “Unlocking our future: Towards a new national science policy” (1998): Interim report, House Science Committee, Washington, DC, 24 September 1998, report.htmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of EnergyCenter for Risk ExcellenceChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations