Natural attenuation/phytoremediation in the vadose zone of a former industrial sludge basin

  • Paul É. Olson
  • John S. Flechter
  • Paul R. Philp
Research Articles


The natural attenuation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the vadose zone of a naturally revegetated former industrial sludge basin (0.45 ha) was examined. This was accomplished by comparing the concentration of 16 PAH contaminants present in sludge collected below the root zone of plants with contaminants present at 3 shallower depths within the root zone. Chemical analysis of 240 samples from 60 cores showed the average concentration of total and individual PAHs in the 0–30 cm, 30–60 cm, and bottom of the root zone strata were approximately 10, 20, and 50%, respectively, of the 16, 800 ppm average total PAH concentration in deep non-rooted sludge. Statistically significant differences in average PAH concentrations were observed between each strata studied and the non-rooted sludge except for the concentrations of acenaphthene and chrysene present at the bottom of the root zone in comparison to sludge values. The rooting depth of the vegetation growing in the basin was dependent on both vegetation type and plant age. Average rooting depths for trees, forbs (herbaceous non-grasses), and grasses were 90, 60, and 50 cm, respectively. The deepest root systems observed (100–120 cm) were associated with the oldest (12–14 year-old) mulberry trees. Examination of root systems and PAH concentrations at numerous locations and depths within the basin indicated that plant roots and their microbially active rhizospheres fostered PAH disappearance; including water insoluble, low volatility compounds, i.e. benzo(a)pyrene and benzo(ghi)perylene. The reduced concentration of PAHs in the upper strata of this revegetated former sludge basin indicated that natural attenuation had occurred. This observation supports the concept that through appropriate planting and management practices (phytoremediation) it will be possible to accelerate, maximize, and sustain natural processes, whereby even the most recalcitrant PAH contaminants (i.e. benzo(a)pyrene) can be remediated over time.


Forensic studies hazardous waste sites industrial sludge basin natural attenuation organic pollutant degradation PAH dissipation phytoremediation plant roots polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) research articles revegetation rhizosphere root-associated microorganisms rooting depth vadose zone 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH (1995): Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbial Reviews.59, 143–169Google Scholar
  2. Brigmon RL, Anderson TA, Fliermans CB (1999): Methanotrophic bacteria in the rhizosphere of trichoroethylene-degrading plants. International Journal of Phytoremediation1, 241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Curl EA, Truelove B (1986): The Rhizosphere. Springer-Verlag. New York, pp 288Google Scholar
  4. Donnelly PK, Hegde RS, Fletcher JS (1994): Growth of PCB-degrading bacteria on compounds from photosynthetic plants. Chemosphere28, 981–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donnelly PK, Fletcher JS (1995): PCB metabolism by mycroorhizal fungi. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol54, 507–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fletcher JS, Hegde RS (1995): Release of phenols by perennial plant roots and their potential importance in bioremediation. Chemosphere31, 3009–3016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaskin J, Fletcher JS (1997): Mineralization of exogenously supplied organic substrates by ponderosa pine roots with and without the ectomycorrhizal fungus Hebeloma crustuliniforme. American Chemical Society, Washington D.C., Symposium series664, 152–160Google Scholar
  8. Kastner M, Lotter S, Heerenklage J, Breuer-Jammali M, Stegmann R, Mahro B (1995): Fate of14C-labeled anthracene and hexadecane in compostmanured soil. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnology43, 1128–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leeson A, Alleman BC (1999): Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents, Petroleum Hydrocarbons, and Other Organic Compounds. The Fifth International In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation Symposium. San Diego, CA. April 19–22, 1999. 5(1) ISBN 1-57477-074-8Google Scholar
  10. Leigh MB (1997): Influence of season, age and senescence of the phenolic content of mulberry fine roots with reference to phytoremediation. MS Thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OKGoogle Scholar
  11. Mackay D, Shiu WY, Ma KC (1992): Illustrated Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals. Volume II: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Polychlorinated Dioxins, and Dibenzofurans. Lewis Publishers. Chelsea, Michigan, pp 597Google Scholar
  12. Nagle DP, Kyle MD, Olson PE, Fletcher JS (1998): Bacterial microflora from a vegetated, PAH-contaminated industrial site. Abstract. IBC Third International Conference on Phytoremediation: Strategies and Evaluation of Phytoremediation’s Performance in the Field. June 22–25, Houston, TXGoogle Scholar
  13. Olson PE, Fletcher JS (1999): Field evaluation of mulberry root structure with regard to phytoremediation. Bioremediation Journal 3, 27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Olson PE, Fletcher JS (2000): Ecological recovery of vegetation at a former industrial sludge basin and its implications to phytoremediation and ecological risk assessment. ESPR — Environ Sci & Pollut Res 7 (4) 195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Siciliano SD, Germida JJ (1997): Bacterial inoculants of forage grasses that enhance degradation of 2-chlorobenzic acid in soil. Eviron Toxicol And Chem 16, 1098–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Siciliano SD, Germida JJ (1998): Mechanisms of phytoremediation: biochemical and ecological interactions between plants and bacteria. Environmental Reviews.6, 65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tansley AG (1935): The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology16, 284–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. USEPA (1986a): Method 3540. Soxhlet Extraction. SW-846: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (Physical/Chemical Methods). United States Environmental Protection Agency: Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  19. USEPA (1986b): Method 8100. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons. SW-846: Test Method for Evaluating Solid Waste (Physical/Chemical Methods). United States Environmental Protection Agency: Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Wiedemeier TH, Wilson JT, Kampbell DH, Miller RN, Hansen JE (1995): Technical protocol for implementing intrinsic remediation with longterm monitoring for natural attenuation of fuel contamination dissolved in groundwater. U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence. San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
  21. Wiedemeier TH, Swanson MA, Moutoux DE, Gordon EK, Wilson JT, Wilson BH, Kampbell DH, Haas PE, Miller RN, Hansen JE, Chapelle FH (1998): Technical protocol for evaluating natural attenuation of chlorinated solvents in ground water. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Research and Development. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecomed Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul É. Olson
    • 1
  • John S. Flechter
    • 2
  • Paul R. Philp
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Department of Botany and MicrobiologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  3. 3.Department of Geology and GeophysicsUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations