Advertisement

Paläontologische Zeitschrift

, Volume 60, Issue 3–4, pp 189–225 | Cite as

Rugosa und Heterocorallia aus Obervisé-Geröllen der Marbella-Formation (Betische Kordillere, Südspanien)

  • Hans-Georg Herbig
Article

Kurzfassung

Aus Kalkgeröllen der post-unterbashkirischen Marbella-Formation (Malagiden, Internzone der Betischen Kordillere) werden sechzehn Arten rugoser Korallen aus elf Gattungen und zwei Arten von Heterokorallen aus zwei Gattungen beschrieben. Die Fauna gehört dem Obervisé V3b-V3c an. Ihre paläogeographische Bedeutung im Rahmen des westlichen Mittelmeergebiets wird diskutiert.

Die bisher nur aus einem Debrisflow-Horizont des Massivs von Mouthoumet (Südfrankreich) bekannteLonsdaleia corbariensis stellt etwa die Hälite der Gesamtfauna. BeiHexaphyllia mirabilis lassen sich fünf-septale Jugendstadien nachweisen.

Abstract

Limestone pebbles of the post-lower Bashkirian Marbella Formation (Malaguides, Internal Zone of the Betic Cordillera) yielded sixteen species of rugose corals belonging to eleven genera and two species of heterocorals belonging to two genera. The fauna is of uppermost Viséan age (V3b-V3c). Its paleogeographic significance within the western Mediterranean is discussed.

Lonsdaleia corbariensis, known up to now only from debris flow deposits of the Mouthoumet massif (Southern France), covers approximately half of the total fauna.Hexaphyllia mirabilis is shown to have juvenile stages with five septa.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Altevogt, G. (1966):Lithostrotium scotiatm (Rugosa) aus dem Visé von Zafra/Spanien. — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh.,1966 (8): 494–500, 5 Abb.; Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  2. Azema, J. (1961): Etude géologique des abords de Málaga (Espagne). — Estud. geol.,17: 131–160, 29 Abb., 1 geol. Kt.; Madrid.Google Scholar
  3. Blumenthal, M. (1930): Beiträge zur Geologie der betischen Cordilleren beiderseits des Rīo Guadalhorce. — Ecl. geol. Helvet.,23: 41–293, 24 Abb., Taf. 7-9; Basel.Google Scholar
  4. Boll, F.-C. (1983): Der Wandel der rugosen Korallenfaunen der Flachwasser-Fazies im Karbon des Kantabrischen Gebirges (Nordspanien). —Diss. Univ. Tübingen: 275 S., 73 Abb.; Tübingen.Google Scholar
  5. Buchroithner, M.;FlÜgel, E.;FlÜgel, H. W. &Stattegger, K. (1980): Mikrofazies, Fossilien und Herkunft der Kalk-Gerölle im Karbon-»Flysch« der Betischen Kordilleren, Spanien. — Facies,2: 1–54, 2 Abb., 1 Tab., Taf. 1-8; Erlangen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crousilles, M.;Dixsaut, C.;Lys, M. &Tamain, G. (1976): Sur les calcaires du Carbonifère inférieur du Nord de Cordoue (Espagne) et leur âge viséen supérieur d’après la microfaune. — Ann. Soc. géol. Nord,96 (4): 399–406, 3 Abb., 1 Tab., 1 Taf.; Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar
  7. Degtjarev, T. T. (1965): Novye rugozy iz nizhnego karbona Yuzhnogo Urala. — Paleont. Zhurn.,1: 48–53, Taf. 3-4; Moskau.Google Scholar
  8. Dobrolyubova, T. A. (1958): Nizhnekamennougolnye kolonialnye chetyrechluchevye korally Russkoi platformy. — Trudy Paleont. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR,70: 1–224, 35 Abb., 38 Taf.; Moskau.Google Scholar
  9. Chanton-Güvenc, N.;Huvelin, P. &Semenoff-Tian-Chansky, P. (1971): Les deux séries d’âge viséen supérieur du jbel Hadid prés de Khénifra (Maroc hercynien central). — Notes Serv. géol. Maroc,31 (no. 237): 7–10, 1 Abb.; Rabat.Google Scholar
  10. Duncan, P. M. (1867): On the generaHeterophyllia, Battersbyia, Palaeocyclus andAsterosmilia; the anatomy of their species and their position in the classification of the sclerodermic zoantharia. — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London,157: 643–656, Taf. 31-32; London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Egeler, C. G. &Simon, O. J. (1969): Sur la tectonique de la Zone Bétique (Cordillères Bétiques, Espagne). — Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Nat., 1. reeks,25 (3): 90 S., 16 Abb., 3 Taf.; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Engel, W. (1984): Migration of folding and flysch sedimentation on the southern flank of the Variscan belt (Montagne Noire, Mouthoumet Massif, Pyrenees). — Z. dt. geol. Ges.,135(1): 279–292, 3 Abb.; Hannover.Google Scholar
  13. Engel, W. &Franke, W. (1983): Flysch-sedimentation: its relations to tectonism in the European Variscides. — [In:]Martin, H. &Eder, F. W. (eds.): Intracontinental Fold Belts: 289–321, 5 Abb.; Berlin- Heidelberg (Springer).Google Scholar
  14. Fedorowski, J. (1971): Aulophyllidae (Tetracoralla) from the Upper Visean of Sudetes and Holy Cross Mountains. — Palaeontographica Polonica,24 (1970): 1–137, 52 Abb., 9 Tab., 23 Taf.; Warschau.Google Scholar
  15. Fedorowski, J. &Gorianov, V. B. (1973): Redescription of tetracorals described by E. Eichwald in »Palaeontology of Russia«. — Acta Palaeont. Polonica,18 (1): 3–70, 20 Abb., 13 Taf.; Warschau.Google Scholar
  16. Garwood, E.J. (1913): The lower Carboniferous succession in the northwest of England. — Quart. J. geol. Soc. London,68: 449–586, 12 Abb., Taf. 44-56; London.Google Scholar
  17. Geel, T. (1973): The geology of the Betic of Málaga, the Subbetic and the zone between these two units in the Vélez Rubio area (Southern Spain). — GUA papers of Geol., Ser. 1,5: 178 S., 40 Abb., 4 Beil., Anhang I–II; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  18. Gorsky, I. I. (1935): Nekotorye Coelenterata iz nizhnekamennougolynch otlozhenij Novoi Zemli. — Trudy Vses. arkt., in-ta,28: 128 S., 27 Abb., 12 Taf.; Leningrad.Google Scholar
  19. —— (1938): Kamennougolyne korally Novoi Zemli. Paleontologija Sovetskoi Arktiki II. — Trudy Vses. arkt. in-ta,93 (2): 1–221, 81 Abb., 16 Taf.; Leningrad.Google Scholar
  20. Herbig, H.-G. (1983): El Carbonífero de las Cordilleras Béticas. —[In]:Martinez-Diaz, C. (ed.): Carbonífero y Permico de España (10. Congr. int. Estrat. Geol. Carbonífero, Madrid 1983): 345–356, 379–380, Abb. X.l —X.3; Madrid.Google Scholar
  21. —— (1984): Rekonstruktion eines nicht mehr existenten Sedimentationsraumes —Die Kalkgerölle im Karbon-Flysch der Malagiden (Betische Kordillere, Südspanien). — Facies,11: 1–108, 21 Abb., 2 Tab., Taf. 1-8; Erlangen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herbig, H.-G. &Mamet, B. (1985): Stratigraphy of the limestone boulders, Marbella Formation (Betic Cordillera, Southern Spain). — C. R. l0è Congr. int. Strat. Gèol. Carbonifère, Madrid 1983, Vol.1: 199–212, 2 Abb., 3 Taf; Madrid.Google Scholar
  23. Hill, D. (1938-1941): A monograph on the Carboniferous rugose corals of Scotland. — Palaeontogr. Soc. London,91 (1938): 1–78, Abb. A-B, Tab. 1-8, Taf. 1-2;92 (1939): 79-114, Taf. 3-5;94 (1940): 115-204, Abb. C, Taf. 6-11;95 (1941): 205-213; London.Google Scholar
  24. Hill, D. (1956): Rugosa. —[In:] Moore, R. C. (ed.): Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part F, Coelenterata: F233–F324, Abb. 165–219; Lawrence/Kansas.Google Scholar
  25. Hill, D. (1981): Coelenterata: Anthozoa. Subclasses Rugosa, Tabulata. —[In:]Teichert, C. (ed.): Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part F, Coelenterata, Suppl. 1, Rugosa and Tabulata: 762 S., 462 Abb., 3 Tab.; Boulder/Colorado-Lawrence/Kansas.Google Scholar
  26. Kabakovitsh, N. V. (1952): Korally roda Palaeosmilia iz nizhnego karbona Podmoskovnogo bassejna. — Trudy Paleont. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSR,40: 85–114, 7 Taf.; Moskau.Google Scholar
  27. Khoa, N. D. (1977): Carboniferous Rugosa and Heterocorallia from boreholes in the Lublin region (Poland). — Acta Palaeont. Polonica,22 (4): 301–404, 45 Abb., 6 Tab., 27 Taf.; Warschau.Google Scholar
  28. Kostic-Podgorska, V. (1957): La fauna des coraux de calcaires crinoides dans les environs de Praca (Bosnie). —Trav. Inst. Geol. »Jovan Zujović«, No. 9:49–91,3 Tab., 15 Taf.; Belgrad. [russ. mit franz. Zsf.]Google Scholar
  29. Lafuste, J. (1981): Microstructure des Hétérocoralliaires (Cnidaria; Carbonifère). — Ann. Paléont. (Invertébrés),67 (1): 1–12, 4 Abb., 2 Taf.; Paris.Google Scholar
  30. Lewis, H. P. (1924): Upper Viséan corals of the genusCaninia. — Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London,80:389–407, Taf. 27-30; London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. —— (1931): The Upper Viséan coralCaninia concavea (Thomson). — Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., ser. 10,16: 118–142, Taf. 5-7; London.Google Scholar
  32. Mamet, B. (1974): Une zonation par Foraminifères du Carbonifère inférieur de la Téthys occidentale. — C. R. 7è Congr. Int. Strat. Géol. Carbonifére, Krefeld 1971,3: 391–407, 4 Abb.; Krefeld.Google Scholar
  33. Mamet, B. &Martinez, C. (1981): Late Viséan microfossils of the Las Caleras Bajas Limestone (Cordoba, Spain). — Rev. Española Micropaleont.,13 (1): 105–118, 1 Abb., 3 Taf.; Madrid.Google Scholar
  34. McCoy, F. (1844): A synopsis of the characters of the Carboniferous Limestone fossils of Ireland: VIII + 207 S., 29 Taf.; Dublin.Google Scholar
  35. —— (1849): On some new genera and species of Palaeozoic corals and foraminifera. — Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., ser. 2,3: 1–20, 3 Abb.; 119-136, 4 Abb.; London.Google Scholar
  36. Menchikoff, N. &Hsu, T.-Y. (1935): Les polypiers Carbonifères du Sahara occidental. — Bull. Soc. géol. France, ser. 5,5: 229–261, Taf. 9-10; Paris.Google Scholar
  37. Michelau, P. (1943): Das Paläozoikum der Betischen Ketten nordwestlich von Málaga. —Diss. Univ. Berlin: 44 S., 6 Abb., 1 geol. Kt.; Berlin.Google Scholar
  38. Milliard, Y. (1959): Sur la présence d’assises carbonifères dans le massif paléozoique interne du Rif. — C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris,249: 1688–1690; Paris.Google Scholar
  39. Milne-Edwards, H. &Haime, J. (1848): Recherches sur les polypiers. Quadrième Mémoire. Monographie des Astréides. — Ann. Sci. nat., ser. 3,10: 209–319, Taf. 5-9; Paris.Google Scholar
  40. Milne-Edwards, H. (1851): Monographie des polypiers fossiles des terrains palaeozoiques, précédée d’un tableau général de la classification des polypes. —Arch. Mus. Hist. nat. Paris,5: 502 S., 20 Taf.; Paris.Google Scholar
  41. —— (1852): A monograph of the British fossil corals. Third part. Corals from the Permian Formation and the Mountain Limestone. — Palaeontogr. Soc,6: 147–210, Taf. 31-46; London.Google Scholar
  42. Minato, M. (1955): Japanese Carboniferous and Permian corals. — J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Hokkaido, ser. 4,9 (2): 1–202, 25 Abb., 43 Taf.; Sapporo.Google Scholar
  43. Minato, M. &Kato, M. (1965): Waagenophyllidae. -J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Hokkaido, ser. 4,12 (3-4): XIII + 241 S., 56 Abb., 20 Taf.; Sapporo.Google Scholar
  44. Navarro, E. &Lacazette, F. (1922): Estudio de la cuenca Carbonífera de los Santos de Maimona (Badajoz). — Bol. oficial Minas y Metalurgia,6 (No. 63): 17–31, 1 Abb.; Madrid.Google Scholar
  45. Niikawa, I. (1979):Carcinophyllum from the Ichinotani Formation in Fukuji, Central Japan. — J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Hokkaido, ser. 4,19 (1-2): 235–240, 1 Abb., 1 Taf.; Sapporo.Google Scholar
  46. Niikawa, I. Rugose corals from Fukuji, Central Japan. Part I. Carboniferous. — J. Gen. Educ. Dep., Niigata Univ., No. 11: 131-161, 1 Abb., 7 Taf.; Niigata.Google Scholar
  47. Perret, M. F. &Semenoff-Tian-Chansky, P. (1971): Coralliaires des calcaires carbonifères d’Ardengost (Hautes-Pyrénées). — Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Toulouse,107 (3-4): 567–594, 5 Taf.; Toulouse.Google Scholar
  48. Phillips, J. (1836): Illustrations of the geology of Yorkshire, part 2: The Mountain Limestone district: XX + 253 S., 25 Taf.; London.Google Scholar
  49. Poty, E. (1978): Donées nouvelles sur les Hétérocoralliaires du Dinantien Belge. — Ann. Soc. géol. Belg.,100 (1977): 233–243, 5 Abb., 2 Taf.; Brüssel.Google Scholar
  50. —— (1981): Recherches sur les Tütracoralliaires et les Hütürocoralliaires du Visüen de la Belgique. — Me- ded. Rijks geol. Dienst,35 (1): 1–161, 63 Abb., 9 Tab., 34 Taf.; Roermond.Google Scholar
  51. Rodriguez, S. (1984): Carboniferous corals from Eastern Cantabrian Mountains: paleogeographic implications. — Palaeontographica Americana,54 (Eds.: Oliver, W. A., Jr.; Sando, W. J.; Cairns, S. T.; Coates, A. G.; Macintyre, I. G.; Bayer, F. M. & Sorauf, J. E.): 433–436,2 Abb.; Lawrence/Kansas.Google Scholar
  52. Rozkowska, M. (1969): Famennian tetracoralloid and heterocoralloid fauna from the Holy Cross Mountains (Poland). — Acta Palaeont. Polonica,14 (1): 1–187, 72 Abb., Taf. 1-8; Warschau.Google Scholar
  53. Ryder, T. A. (1930): Notes on »Carcinophyllum, Nich. & Thom.«, with descriptions of two new species. — Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., ser. 10,5: 337–351, 5 Abb.; London.Google Scholar
  54. Salée, A. (1913): Contribution à ľétude des polypiers du Calcaire Carbonifère de la Belgique. II. Le groupe des Clisiophyllides. — Mém. Inst. géol. Univ. Louvain,1: 179–293, 5 Abb., Taf. 4-11; Louvain.Google Scholar
  55. Schindewolf, O. H. (1941): Zur Kenntnis der Heterophylliden, einer eigentümlichen paläozoischen Korallengruppe. — Paläont. Z.,22: 213–306, 54 Abb., Taf. 9-16; Berlin.Google Scholar
  56. Semenoff-Tian-Chansky, P. (1974): Recherches sur les tétracoralliaires du Carbonifère du Sahara occidental. —Centre rech. zones arides, ser. géol, No. 21: 316 S., 100 Abb., 4 Tab., 76 Taf.; Paris (ed.: CNRS).Google Scholar
  57. Semenoff-Tian-Chansky, P. &Ovtracht, A. (1966): Madréporaires du Carbonifère des Hautes-Cor-bieres. — Bull. Soc. géol. France, ser. 7,7 (1965): 722–732, 3 Abb., Taf. 29-30; Paris.Google Scholar
  58. Thomson, J. (1883): On the development and generic relatíon of the corals of the Carboniferous System of Scotland. — Proc. Roy. philos. Soc. Glasgow,14: 296–502, Taf. 1-14; Glasgow.Google Scholar
  59. Thomson, J. (1893): On the generaCalophyllum andCampophyllum. — Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., ser. 3,2: 667–758, Taf. 15-21; Dublin.Google Scholar
  60. Thomson, J. &Nicholson, H. A. (1875-1876): Contributions to the study of the chief generic types of the Palaeozoic corals. — Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., ser. 4,16 (11): 305–309; 16 (12): 424-429, Taf. 12; 17 (1): 60-70, Taf. 6-7; 17 (2): 123-128, Taf. 8;17 (4): 290-305, Taf. 12-17; 17 (6): 451-461, Taf. 21-25; 18 (7): 68-73, Taf. 1-3; London.Google Scholar
  61. Unsalaner-Kiragli, C. (1958): Lower Carboniferous corals from Turkey. — J. Paleont. Soc. India,3: 53–58, 1 Abb., 1 Tab., Taf. 11-12; Lucknow.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans-Georg Herbig
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für GeologieFreie Universität BerlinBerlin 33

Personalised recommendations